Home
ApexSpeed Portal HomeApexSPeed Reader GalleryApexSpeed.blogsApexSpeed AdvertisingForums










Go Back   ApexSpeed > Formula F > FF: Honda Fit Conversions

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 20th, 2009, 7:00 PM   #1
cooleyjb
Forum Advertiser
 
cooleyjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 13th, 2005
Location: VIR/North Carolina
Posts: 999


Default Honda engines in FF?

From the most recent fastrack
\

http://www.scca.com/documents/Fastra...strack-aug.pdf


Apparently there is a kit for teh DB1, cost 12,000 bucks and one is already done and will be shown off at the FF festival.

Nice to hear about this after the fact or did I miss something.

___

Joe Cooley


Gear From DefNder, Bell Helmets, HJC Helmets, Bald Spot Sports, AIM, Arai, Shock Doctor, Alpinestars, Safety Solutions R3, Traqmate, Hawk Brake Pads and others.
cooleyjb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 7:12 PM   #2
Wren
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 27th, 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 775


Default

It has actually had me interested to the point that I have been looking around at cars(CF type stuff) for the last few weeks.

I know there are a lot of things to work out, and there will be a lot of resistance, but it has potential. I know the zetec thing took way longer to work out than originally promised and had some personalities involved that only made things worse, but I think it has been a net positive for the class and they finally have it close.

I know a FF competitor who paid $16k for his runoffs engine last year (carb-to-clutch) from a prominent builder and it is already going soft. There has to be some room for improvement over that.

I wonder what is in the $5050 engine conversion kit? Is that a one time expense? All parts required?

Any clue how long one of these might last?

Also- I predict more than 5 pages for this thread.
Wren is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 7:26 PM   #3
BB2
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: November 29th, 2005
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 29


Default

Don't we usually do this in the winter?
BB2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 7:40 PM   #4
cooleyjb
Forum Advertiser
 
cooleyjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 13th, 2005
Location: VIR/North Carolina
Posts: 999


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wren View Post
It has actually had me interested to the point that I have been looking around at cars(CF type stuff) for the last few weeks.

I know there are a lot of things to work out, and there will be a lot of resistance, but it has potential. I know the zetec thing took way longer to work out than originally promised and had some personalities involved that only made things worse, but I think it has been a net positive for the class and they finally have it close.

I know a FF competitor who paid $16k for his runoffs engine last year (carb-to-clutch) from a prominent builder and it is already going soft. There has to be some room for improvement over that.

I wonder what is in the $5050 engine conversion kit? Is that a one time expense? All parts required?

Any clue how long one of these might last?

Also- I predict more than 5 pages for this thread.
I think I'm in the same boat. It would be really nice to see an engine with the same longevity as teh Zetec, or longer.

Maybe since Honda proposed the change they could maybe do soemthing to subsidize the costs of the changeover for the intial roll out.

___

Joe Cooley


Gear From DefNder, Bell Helmets, HJC Helmets, Bald Spot Sports, AIM, Arai, Shock Doctor, Alpinestars, Safety Solutions R3, Traqmate, Hawk Brake Pads and others.
cooleyjb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 8:04 PM   #5
Greg Mercurio
Banned
 
Join Date: October 30th, 2002
Location: Vacaville CA
Posts: 732


Default

Send your comments to the CRB.

crb@scca.com

Posting them here is like pissing in your wetsuit.
Greg Mercurio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 9:06 PM   #6
Brad Ellingson
Senior Member
 
Brad Ellingson's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 18th, 2002
Location: 78 sq. Miles Surrounded by Reality, WI
Posts: 776


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Mercurio View Post

Posting them here is like pissing in your wetsuit.

Maybe they are looking for that warm feeling...

___

www.bradellingson.com
Swift DB-1
Brad Ellingson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 9:54 PM   #7
Doug Carter
Administrator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 3,266


Default




Woa. I just happen to have an empty one of these at home in need of a new engine.

___

.
squarehead.design
helmet paint for racers
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:01 PM   #8
T644HU05
Senior Member
 
T644HU05's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 4th, 2007
Location: Ahwatukee, AZ
Posts: 253


Default

Formula Fornda? Formula Honord? Formula Kentfit? Formula Fitent? I can't think what they would change the class name to.

___

Man will race anything. It's in his blood. His Soul. He must.

Kurtis C. 1980 Shirley MacLane FV (sold), Lola T644 (sold) Murray FK1 FST (being reborn)
T644HU05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:07 PM   #9
-pru-
Contributing Member
 
-pru-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 2nd, 2000
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 338


Default 2009 Aug FastTrack : Page 6

Proposal...

Quote:
WHAT DO YOU THINK?

The CRB welcomes member comments, particularly from those directly involved in Formula Ford, on the following topic.

The CRB has received a proposal from Honda Performance Development (HPD) to include the Honda Fit 1.5 liter engine in the Formula Ford class. The proposal includes a general presentation of the concept, which is summarized below, and the specific FF rules changes that would be necessary. HPD has also submitted engine dynamometer graphs comparing a restricted Fit 1.5 liter engine and a current "National level" Kent FF engine. The restricted Fit engine produces slightly less horsepower than the Kent engine with a nearly identically shaped power curve. (The testing was done on the same dynamometer on the same day by a well known FF engine builder.) The Fit engine has been installed in a DB-1 chassis and has undergone over 200 miles of testing. HPD will present the car at Road America during the 40th Anniversary Formula Ford races, July 24-26. If member comment is favorable, the complete rules changes will be presented in a future FasTrack.

The CRB does not view this proposal to be in any way exclusive of similar future proposals for Formula Ford engines from other sources. Although the proposal includes an installation kit for the DB-1 and HPD may decide to produce kits for other chassis, use of the kit would not be required. The use of certain HPD parts would be required, but the base Fit engine could be acquired through other sources. Participants would be able to continue to use the Kent engine indefinitely. The rules for regional Club Formula Ford (and similar classes) would not be affected by this proposal unless regions chose to include it.

A Proposal for Incorporating the Honda Fit 1.5 Liter Engine in Formula Ford

Purpose: To phase in a new engine in the Formula Ford class that would substantially reduce the operating cost and extend the life of the class with a flow of new modern engines and replacement parts.
HPD’s plan is to enhance a nationally competitive formula with parity across multiple engine models with an easily manageable rules plan for SCCA. This proposal is a "turn key" engine solution with all parts (intake through to exhaust) being a mandated single source kit sold exclusively through HPD. This professionally designed "turn key" approach along with our established manufacturing supply chain reinforces our commitment to engine reliability, durability and a low operating cost.

The Honda Fit with the L15A7 engine is in the beginning of what is typically a six year production life cycle and has sales estimates of over 50,000 units per year. Long-term parts availability will be secure because Federal law requires manufacturers to supply replacement parts for a minimum of ten years after cessation of production.

This plan would bring a new, modern and reliable engine that requires minimal maintenance labor and cost, with an expected minimum 5,000 mile service range between rebuilds. It would have minimal impact for car owners by utilizing a chassisfriendly conversion that is a bolt-in design with components supplied in kit form and not requiring irreversible changes such as welding. Class involvement would be increased by greatly reducing engine maintenance and tuning. It could be of interest to car owners that have parked their cars due to current high operating costs and could make Formula Ford a cost effective "starter class" again.
Selected features of the proposal
No engine modifications, only standard rebuilds using stock parts allowed.

Stock Honda Fit flywheel and clutch.

HPD oil pan and dry sump lubrication system, available in kit form from HPD.

An HPD manufactured exhaust manifold is required. Headers, collectors and primary pipes are eliminated; cylinder head design incorporates a single exhaust outlet flange. Only exhaust pipes after the manifold need to be added.

An HPD supplied ECU and wiring loom is required. The ECU is sealed and maps can not be changed.

Fuel injectors are stock Honda Fit production items and may not be modified.

An HPD supplied Intake manifold, intake restrictor plate and throttle body is required.
Parts Kits and approximate costs
Part # 06200-F21S-A00 KIT $12,000
Complete kit for DB-1, which includes the following kits.

Part # 10000-F21S-A00 ENGINE ASSY $ 2,500
The base engine

Part # 06015-F21S-A00 KIT $ 5,050
Engine conversion kit

Part # 06020-F21S-A00 KIT $ 4,450
Chassis conversion kit

___

-pru-
Swift DB-1 055-85
SVR-SCCA
-pru- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:09 PM   #10
Doug Carter
Administrator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 3,266


Default

Interesting looking engine in stock Fit configuration...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 10269056.jpg (170.2 KB, 393 views)

___

.
squarehead.design
helmet paint for racers
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:09 PM   #11
glenn cooper
Contributing Member
 
glenn cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18th, 2006
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 917


Default Knowing Honda...

they would probably still allow it to be called Formula Ford!

GC
glenn cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:13 PM   #12
Jim Garry
Contributing Member
 
Jim Garry's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4th, 2003
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 794


Default

I have a feeling this is going to be a long thread ..........


Engine Type

Engine Block/Cylinder Head Aluminum-Alloy
Displacement (cc) 1497
Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net) 117 @ 6600 Torque (lb-ft @ rpm) 106 @ 4800
Redline (rpm) 6800
Bore and Stroke (mm) 73 x 89.4
Multi-Point Fuel Injection Standard
Drive-by-Wire™ Throttle System Standard
Front-Wheel Drive Standard
CARB Emissions Rating [1] ULEV-2
Direct Ignition System with Immobilizer Standard
100K +/- Miles No Scheduled Tune-Ups [2] Standard

___

Jim


"The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." Mark Twain
Jim Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:17 PM   #13
Doug Carter
Administrator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 3,266


Default

Please keep in mind everyone, that this is being proposed as an option engine to the Kent, with less power and longer life. This is not a proposal to eliminate the Kent engine, but to offer up a choice to those of us who aren't interested in playing the Kent engine game.


It's long overdue, IMO. Even with that steep entry price tag, it's something I would definitely seriously have to consider as long term plans for my car. The initial expense could easily be justified with almost no rebuild costs over many seasons.




Personally, I can't wait to see this car in person.



___

.
squarehead.design
helmet paint for racers
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:21 PM   #14
-pru-
Contributing Member
 
-pru-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 2nd, 2000
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 338


Default Curious...

Quote:
The restricted Fit engine produces slightly less horsepower than the Kent engine with a nearly identically shaped power curve. (The testing was done on the same dynamometer on the same day by a well known FF engine builder.) The Fit engine has been installed in a DB-1 chassis and has undergone over 200 miles of testing. HPD will present the car at Road America during the 40th Anniversary Formula Ford races, July 24-26.
A couple of questions:
~ Which engine builder?
~ Who "donated" the chassis?
~ Who did the "200 miles of testing"
~ When / where did the testing occur?
~ Photo's of the install?
Come on, someone on here has the answers, and yes, we can "handle the truth"!

As a DB-1 owner, looking over the "Fit" conversion will be certain be high on my list of things "to do" at the 40th!

___

-pru-
Swift DB-1 055-85
SVR-SCCA
-pru- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:23 PM   #15
Doug Carter
Administrator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 3,266


Default

I will post photos of the car here as soon as I have them in the camera on Friday.

I hope someone has something to post before then. I don't know if I can wait until this weekend.



___

.
squarehead.design
helmet paint for racers
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:30 PM   #16
HazelNut
Senior Member
 
HazelNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7th, 2002
Location: locust valley, ny USA
Posts: 1,060


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Mercurio View Post
Send your comments to the CRB.

crb@scca.com

sent!










Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Mercurio View Post
pissing in your wetsuit.
DONE!

___

Awww, come on guys, it's so simple. Maybe you need a refresher course. Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays.
HazelNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:55 PM   #17
-pru-
Contributing Member
 
-pru-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 2nd, 2000
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 338


Default HPD...

Honda Perfomance Development, Inc

Quote:
BACKGROUND: Honda Performance Development (HPD), a subsidiary of American Honda Motor Co., Inc., is the technical operations center for Honda's high-performance racing engines. HPD also coordinates Honda's participation in the IndyCar Series Racing.

FACILITY: HPD operates out of a 123,000-square-foot building in Santa Clarita, California and opened in late January 2005. The two-story structure houses comprehensive engine Research & Development operations, including engine design; development engineering; prototype and production parts manufacturing; race engine preparation and rebuilding; material analysis facilities; quality control inspection areas; five engine dynamometer test cells; machine shop; electronics lab; parts center; multiple meeting/conference rooms; and administrative offices.

KEY PERSONNEL: Erik Berkman, President
Jack Spurney, General Manager
Stephen Eriksen, Technical Director
Roger Griffiths, Manager, Development Division
Daisuke Horiuchi, Chief Engineer
Marc Sours, Manager, Production Division
Any guess as to the FF link within HPD? That is, who within the company is linked (past/present) to FF?

___

-pru-
Swift DB-1 055-85
SVR-SCCA
-pru- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 10:59 PM   #18
-pru-
Contributing Member
 
-pru-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 2nd, 2000
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 338


Default HPD : Roger Griffiths

Hmm...

Quote:
Roger Griffiths
Manager, Development Division

A veteran engineer with experience in Formula One, endurance sports cars, and touring-car racing, Roger Griffiths came to Honda Performance Development in 2003 from the motorsports department of Aston Martin. He assumed the duties of Race Team Technical Leader, responsible for HPD's trackside operations and engineering team, and continues in that role today as Race Team Manager and Project Leader for Honda's IndyCar Series effort.

Griffiths is a 1991 engineering/design graduate from Loughborough University of Technology. After two years with Nissan's European Technology Centre, Griffiths joined Cosworth Racing as a trackside engineer for the Sauber F1 team from 1994-96. Four years with Ray Mallock Ltd., saw Griffiths gain experience in touring-car racing and he served later as design project leader for the RML P20 Supersports car.

He returned to Formula One in 1999 as project leader for the Minardi Formula One team, then as a race engineer with European Minardi in 2001. Griffiths was named Chief Engineer for the Team Ascari Le Mans Prototype program prior to joining Aston Martin and then HPD in 2003.

___

-pru-
Swift DB-1 055-85
SVR-SCCA
-pru- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 11:10 PM   #19
cooleyjb
Forum Advertiser
 
cooleyjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 13th, 2005
Location: VIR/North Carolina
Posts: 999


Default

Maybe we can get some good discussion going on this too. Yeah it's not going to affect what the CRB may do but it would help people like me get a better understanding of what's going on.


Right now I see the pluses and minuses.

Pros-

Engine Longevity
Not chasing the perfect head/parity
Bringing newer technology might bring in more drivers.
Factory Support from Honda??? Contingency, etc.

Cons

Initial Cost
Only DB1 kit currently. Would need to be soemthing that would work in the overwhelming majority of cars to be a good solution. Not just a few 'flavors of the week'.
It's not a ford motor, not a biggie but still it is Formula Ford
Competitive balance. Hasn't been the prettiest thing in FC with the Zetec.

___

Joe Cooley


Gear From DefNder, Bell Helmets, HJC Helmets, Bald Spot Sports, AIM, Arai, Shock Doctor, Alpinestars, Safety Solutions R3, Traqmate, Hawk Brake Pads and others.
cooleyjb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 11:14 PM   #20
Dave Gomberg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31st, 2004
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 545


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooleyjb View Post
From the most recent fastrack

http://www.scca.com/documents/Fastra...strack-aug.pdf

Apparently there is a kit for the DB1, cost 12,000 bucks and one is already done and will be shown off at the FF festival.

Nice to hear about this after the fact or did I miss something.
No, Joe, you didn't miss anything. HPD sent the proposal to the BoD and CRB this month - barely in time for us to get it into the new FasTrack. Outside of HPD, the only ones who knew about it previously were the engine builder and the car owner.

Dave
Dave Gomberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 11:23 PM   #21
Dave Gomberg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31st, 2004
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 545


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wren View Post
...

I wonder what is in the $5050 engine conversion kit? Is that a one time expense? All parts required?
Yes, it is a one-time expense. It includes all the required pieces (intake, restrictor, ecu, dry sump, exhaust manifold, etc. - only the pipe from the manifold is not included). The chassis conversion kit includes the Hewland adapter and all the parts to bolt it into the DB-1 (no welding required, no mods to the chassis required).

Quote:
Any clue how long one of these might last?
No real data, of course, but multiple years of hard use at a minimum.

Dave
Dave Gomberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 11:23 PM   #22
SOseth
Senior Member
 
SOseth's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8th, 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 129


Default Honda in FF

This seems to me to be a much better fit (no pun intended) than the Zetec in FC. The power curve matches almost identically with a good Kent engine. (not the best Kent engine) I understand any person and/or any engine builder can purchase the necessary parts from Honda. This is, in my opinion is a huge step forward for the class.

SteveO
SOseth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 11:30 PM   #23
Dave Gomberg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31st, 2004
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 545


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenn cooper View Post
they would probably still allow it to be called Formula Ford!

GC
More than "allow". It is what they want.

Dave
Dave Gomberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2009, 11:39 PM   #24
Doug Carter
Administrator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 3,266


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooleyjb View Post
Initial Cost
Yes, but would quickly be dispersed by the lack of engine rebuilds.



Quote:
Only DB1 kit currently. Would need to be soemthing that would work in the overwhelming majority of cars to be a good solution. Not just a few 'flavors of the week'.
While not exactly the flavor of the week in FF, the DB1 the best place to start with new engine adaptation. There are more DB1s out there than just about everything else. With a solution that works in a DB1, everything else could be brought into scope following this chassis.



Quote:
It's not a ford motor, not a biggie but still it is Formula Ford
Don't get hung up on the class name. Ford hasn't supported this class in my adult life. They are getting free press and exposure for an engine that hasn't been made in 29 years. Call it Formula F. Who cares about the name if it keeps the class alive and growing.



Quote:
Competitive balance. Hasn't been the prettiest thing in FC with the Zetec.
Yes, but ask ANY FC driver who is in a Zetec now that raced a Pinto before and ask them which they prefer. In my experience, I don't know anyone who prefers the tractor motor in their car.



If the Fit engine could produce 112-115 hp out of the crate, and didn't need rebuilds for 5,000 miles, I think many would overlook the slight dip in performance. Besides, the DB1 is not pushing for a National title anytime soon, so I would guess that the target market is not the 10/10ths FF guy. Just a guess.

___

.
squarehead.design
helmet paint for racers
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 12:22 AM   #25
stonebridge20
Contributing Member
 
stonebridge20's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12th, 2006
Location: Sherman, CT
Posts: 1,340


Default

FF = Formula Fit

___

Mike Agnifilo
Stonebridge Sports and Classics ltd
186 Grassy Plain St
Bethel, CT 06801
(203)744-1120
Cryogenic Processing · REM-ISF Processing · Race Prep & Driver Development
stonebridge20 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 12:48 AM   #26
SteveG
Late Braking Member
 
Join Date: September 4th, 2002
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 230


Default

Looks like there's no where to go but up from the IRL and ALMS.

Formula Fit Forever.
SteveG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 12:49 AM   #27
rmccown
Global Moderator
 
rmccown's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 31st, 2007
Location: Littleton, MA
Posts: 535


Default

Anyone know, size-wise, how the Fit engine compares to the Kent? Curious, since I don't have a whole lot of space between the frame rails as it is.

___

Bob McCown
Van Diemen RF81 #472
2009 ARS CF
"I barked twice." - Enzo (the dog)
rmccown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 1:46 AM   #28
provamo
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 24th, 2004
Location: san francisco
Posts: 338


Default

end of an era......................forget the 50th
provamo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 2:13 AM   #29
Garey Guzman
Contributing Member
 
Garey Guzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9th, 2002
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,229


Default

I got a write up on this last week but was sworn to secrecy pending the unveiling this weekend. I guess it got out a little sooner! As I recall, the two guys leading the charge on this are FF enthusiasts who happen to work at HPD. In fact, there is a former HPD manager who will be racing the Lola he's had since well before he retired. I think the write-up also mentioned that it will be doing some laps. It would be interesting to see how it compared with a kent-powered DB1 with similar drivers. I say we put a couple Runoff winners in them and run 'em!

Should be interesting to see the conversion. I wonder what the conversion does to the car's weight and balance....

___

Garey Guzman
FF #4 (Former Cal Club member, current Atlanta Region member)
http://redroadracing.tripod.com/rrr/
Garey Guzman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 2:17 AM   #30
Rick Kirchner
Contributing Member
 
Rick Kirchner's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24th, 2002
Location: Ridgecrest. CA
Posts: 2,263


Default

I called it (sort of) in Aug 2006:

http://www.apexspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18347

post #48.......
Rick Kirchner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 7:55 AM   #31
SOseth
Senior Member
 
SOseth's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8th, 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 129


Default Size

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmccown View Post
Anyone know, size-wise, how the Fit engine compares to the Kent? Curious, since I don't have a whole lot of space between the frame rails as it is.
The Honda engine is shorter than the Kent by about 3 inches. One of the reasons they chose to convert a DB-1 is because it would be one of the tighter installations.

SteveO
SOseth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 8:50 AM   #32
Greg Mercurio
Banned
 
Join Date: October 30th, 2002
Location: Vacaville CA
Posts: 732


Default

Well who gives a good GDDM about rules stability anyway.
Greg Mercurio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 8:55 AM   #33
-pru-
Contributing Member
 
-pru-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 2nd, 2000
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 338


Default Is it snowing somewhere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BB2 View Post
Don't we usually do this in the winter?
I think it's a case of "Christmas in July"...

___

-pru-
Swift DB-1 055-85
SVR-SCCA
-pru- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 8:56 AM   #34
Doug Carter
Administrator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 3,266


Default

Rules stability is great... just look at FV. No major rule changes since before I was born. Now even the engine builders can't find any of the parts that make those engines run. Great for the class. Should be really strong in the next 5-10 years.

</sarcasm>




Again, the Kent is not going away or changing or getting removed from the rulebook—just like the Pinto. If nothing else, it should bring the costs of second-hand Kents back to reality.




Anyone want a DB1 of their own to play with a Honda?

___

.
squarehead.design
helmet paint for racers
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 9:06 AM   #35
-pru-
Contributing Member
 
-pru-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 2nd, 2000
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 338


Default Feedback...

Thanks for the feedback Garey!

A additional thoughts / questions regarding the HPD 1.5:

~ Fuel Injection
Improved throttle response vs the current light(est) Kent flywheel?
In cooler weather, FI has to be an advantage over the carb

~ Electronic Ignition
The Pertronix has made this less of an issue, but I believe the HPD 1.5 will be a marked improvement in reliability.

~ Rev Limiter?
I know most (if not all) of the Honda manual trans cars I have owned have a built in rev limiter. Will this be the case with the HPD 1.5?

~ Pump Gas?
It would be nice to run pump gas!

~ Weight?
I have to believe that the whole installation is lighter, but by how much over a aluminum head Kent?

~ Sound?
What is the difference between the Kent and HPD 1.5? There are a few road legal Honda's in Solo that seem much louder that my DB-1!

___

-pru-
Swift DB-1 055-85
SVR-SCCA
-pru- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 9:20 AM   #36
mike g.
Contributing Member
 
mike g.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: February 26th, 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio, USA
Posts: 411


Default So I think I am for this.

I think I am all for this - until someone smarter tells me why it is a bad idea....

I am fearing a $5k rebuild this winter on a tired engine, only to run two or three seasons and shell out another $5k... and having to do the (most likely) more difficult maintenance on the 1600 for those years...

Also....One added benefit I haven't seen posted is, assuming it runs standard ECU/electronics - is that you can plug the ECU in for data acq in a plug-n-play config probably standard to the Honda [can?] bus....

I wonder what they sound like? If I put a Honda engine in there, does it come with a package of stickers and a racing stripe?

___

---------
Mike Green
1975 Hawke DL-12
mikegoesracing.com
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
mike g. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 9:34 AM   #37
RobLav
Contributing Member
 
RobLav's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 5th, 2000
Location: Scotland, Connecticut
Posts: 1,505


Default

Great idea. All for it.

___

Rob
08 Citation F1000

RobLav is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 9:36 AM   #38
Dave Harmison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 5th, 2001
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 328


Default

I've had this discussion with my Spec Miata friends.

"What's stock?"

"Stock is stock!"

"Great, what does a piston weigh? What is the diameter of the intake and exhaust ports?"

My point being that HPD should provide (and be required to provide) every weight, dimension and specification that is currently written in the FF section of the GCR.

It is the ONLY way to keep "stock" stock.

Unless you want to go sealed engines like SRF, which I think also has its merits.

Granted, I am a Club Ford driver, but some day I'd like to try a modern car.

We should schedule a discussion (bar room brawl) of this at the 40th. Just joking.
Dave Harmison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 9:39 AM   #39
provamo
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 24th, 2004
Location: san francisco
Posts: 338


Default

dont forget the coffee can sized exhaust tip!
provamo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 9:48 AM   #40
mblanc
Senior Member
 
mblanc's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 10th, 2002
Location: swisstown.com
Posts: 410


Default STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT !!

I cry FOUL, NO FAIR, STOP !


It is completely unfair to even start this discussions, while anybody who IS anybody, is offline, and on their way to one of the best Formula Ford events ever.

I respectfully ask everybody to hold comment on this until AFTER the FF40th.

No doubt there are many issues to be discussed, but this weekend is about the

HISTORY OF FORMULA FORD !!!!

It is NOT about some proposal to rules, that may or may not ever be built and or raced.


Out of respect for the event, and the organizers, please, lets not have a wholesale discussion of this, while everybody that is seriously involved in Formula Ford is doing what everybody else wishes they were doing......... DRIVING TO THE RACE TRACK, THEN RACING,

In what is destined to be the best event ever.


Please discontinue this discussion here until 8:00 am Monday July 27th. Then have at it.

___

Marc Blanc
How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg. --Abraham Lincoln
mblanc is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alternate, crb, engine, fit, ford, honda, hpd, kent, l15a7, quicksilver


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.