Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 401 to 436 of 436

Thread: Pinto Upgrades

  1. #401
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    The new allowances for the Pinto should make a difference. It may take some time to develop the new combination but they will be in the hunt as soon as someone gets the combo close.
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  2. #402
    Senior Member kea's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.17.00
    Location
    madison heights,mi
    Posts
    3,261
    Liked: 592

    Default Pinto Upgrades

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    The new allowances for the Pinto should make a difference. It may take some time to develop the new combination but they will be in the hunt as soon as someone gets the combo close.
    Not likely.
    Keith
    Averill Racing Stuff, Inc.
    www.racing-stuff.com
    248-585-9139

  3. The following 3 users liked this post:


  4. #403
    Senior Member Jim Gustafson's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.28.04
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI area
    Posts
    729
    Liked: 29

    Default Weber 38?

    Does anyone here have info or feedback regarding the 38? I'm curious to know what jets and emulsion tubes were found to work well? You can pm me if you prefer.

    Thanks,
    Jim Gustafson

  5. #404
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    OK sportsfans,

    4.5 years after i started this thread...
    Here is a picture of the comparison between the old and new legal SCCA parts.

    Old short rod and tall piston on the bottom of picture.
    New long rod and short piston on the top of picture.

    You'll probably get about double the ring and cylinder sleeve life using these new parts. A no brainer.

    Why care about the Pinto almost 50 years later? Because for the beginner or budget minded racer the pinto is a cool way to go. If you aren't afraid of wrenching it's an easy engine to keep running on the regional level. No ECU, no submerged electric fuel pump, no injectors to send off for cleaning. Don't get me wrong, the zetec or MZR is better, but the bang for the buck for the budget minded, the pinto can produce a lot of fun.

    Look at the current boom in S2 racing using the pinto.

  6. The following 10 users liked this post:


  7. #405
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,153
    Liked: 1245

    Default

    Only half a piston!

    Because for the beginner or budget minded racer the pinto is a cool way to go.
    I spent last weekend sorting out problems/gremlins after a tear down and re-assembly.

    I introduced myself to another local racer that I had not met before and explained why I missed a session and that I was going to adjust the cam timing. In reply I was asked if that was something I could do from the cockpit.

    We don't send fighter pilots or astronauts up without a working knowledge of their aircraft but we have no problem with racers not having a clue. I found it sad.

    But that sadness was replaced by the pride of knowing I can visualize every nut, bolt, bearing, gear, etc. and their interactions whenever I accelerate, turn, shift or brake. I feel sad for those that don't get the complete experience of this sport.

    Yep, it may be a PITA sometimes, but on my budget I can race this.

  8. The following 2 users liked this post:


  9. #406
    Classifieds Super License stonebridge20's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.13.06
    Location
    Danbury, CT.
    Posts
    3,683
    Liked: 1839

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Frog View Post
    OK sportsfans,

    4.5 years after i started this thread...
    Here is a picture of the comparison between the old and new legal SCCA parts.

    Old short rod and tall piston on the bottom of picture.
    New long rod and short piston on the top of picture.

    You'll probably get about double the ring and cylinder sleeve life using these new parts. A no brainer.

    Why care about the Pinto almost 50 years later? Because for the beginner or budget minded racer the pinto is a cool way to go. If you aren't afraid of wrenching it's an easy engine to keep running on the regional level. No ECU, no submerged electric fuel pump, no injectors to send off for cleaning. Don't get me wrong, the zetec or MZR is better, but the bang for the buck for the budget minded, the pinto can produce a lot of fun.

    Look at the current boom in S2 racing using the pinto.
    Kinda like a Kent powered FF.
    Stonebridge Sports & Classics ltd
    15 Great Pasture Rd Danbury, CT. 06810 (203) 744-1120
    www.cryosciencetechnologies.com
    Cryogenic Processing · REM-ISF Processing · Race Prep & Driver Development

  10. The following members LIKED this post:


  11. #407
    Senior Member David Ferguson's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    Paso Robles, CA
    Posts
    1,155
    Liked: 282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeerBudgetRacing View Post
    I introduced myself to another local racer that I had not met before and explained why I missed a session and that I was going to adjust the cam timing. In reply I was asked if that was something I could do from the cockpit.
    BTW - I could adjust the cam timing of my 2L MZR / MoTeC from the cockpit if I wanted to.
    David Ferguson
    Veracity Racing Data
    Shift RPM App for iOS
    805-238-1699

  12. #408
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,153
    Liked: 1245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Ferguson View Post
    BTW - I could adjust the cam timing of my 2L MZR / MoTeC from the cockpit if I wanted to.
    And you know how that works....

    This driver was in a 93 VD Pinto nearly identical to my 94. My point is: do you know what you're driving?

    I can't imagine not wanting to know and understand.

  13. The following members LIKED this post:


  14. #409
    Contributing Member Latebraker's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.11.06
    Location
    British columbia Canada
    Posts
    126
    Liked: 25

    Default Pinto Engine

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    The new allowances for the Pinto should make a difference. It may take some time to develop the new combination but they will be in the hunt as soon as someone gets the combo close.
    The Pinto will not make the same HP or Torque curve the Zetec makes. The Zetec dyno sheet from a well known engine builder on a Zetec motor that ran at the run off's in 2018 that finished in the top 10 had a HP and Torque curve that was as flat as a table top from 5000rpm to 7000rpm making over 150 hp. It is impossible to get a carburetor to do that you have to pick your sweet spot bottom mid or top end you can't have it all with a carb.
    I would like to have my question answered as to why the Zetec has a 8 lb flywheel and the pinto 10 lb flywheel. If the Pinto had the 8 lb flywheel and the Zetec the 10 lb flywheel chances are they maybe a little closer out the hole or at least allow the Pinto to run the same 8 lb flywheel. Not quite sure why anyone would object to helping the Pinto it is a cheap fix that only helps the bottom end and has no advantage on the top end. +-$400 for a flywheel verses $2000 for pistons rods carb plus a rebuild.

  15. The following 6 users liked this post:


  16. #410
    Contributing Member hdsporty1988's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.01.16
    Location
    Paddock Lake WI
    Posts
    485
    Liked: 193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latebraker View Post
    The Pinto will not make the same HP or Torque curve the Zetec makes. The Zetec dyno sheet from a well known engine builder on a Zetec motor that ran at the run off's in 2018 that finished in the top 10 had a HP and Torque curve that was as flat as a table top from 5000rpm to 7000rpm making over 150 hp. It is impossible to get a carburetor to do that you have to pick your sweet spot bottom mid or top end you can't have it all with a carb.
    I would like to have my question answered as to why the Zetec has a 8 lb flywheel and the pinto 10 lb flywheel. If the Pinto had the 8 lb flywheel and the Zetec the 10 lb flywheel chances are they maybe a little closer out the hole or at least allow the Pinto to run the same 8 lb flywheel. Not quite sure why anyone would object to helping the Pinto it is a cheap fix that only helps the bottom end and has no advantage on the top end. +-$400 for a flywheel verses $2000 for pistons rods carb plus a rebuild.
    Anyone got a dyno sheet from a Zetec or a long stroke Pinto? Here is mine from a regular Pinto with the upgraded cam rebuilt by Farley in July. I know dyno's vary, but it would still be good to compare curves. anyone willing to share?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  17. #411
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    162 hp at redline. Yee Haw!

    You shouldn't have shown what a lot of us knew.
    Somebody will start wanting to slow pintos down.

  18. #412
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.05.06
    Location
    Frederick MD
    Posts
    240
    Liked: 27

    Default



    Here is a long rod pinto off of our dyno with all the legal updates.I think this would run with a zetec well.

    Quote Originally Posted by hdsporty1988 View Post
    Anyone got a dyno sheet from a Zetec or a long stroke Pinto? Here is mine from a regular Pinto with the upgraded cam rebuilt by Farley in July. I know dyno's vary, but it would still be good to compare curves. anyone willing to share?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  19. The following members LIKED this post:


  20. #413
    Contributing Member hdsporty1988's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.01.16
    Location
    Paddock Lake WI
    Posts
    485
    Liked: 193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Frog View Post
    162 hp at redline. Yee Haw!

    You shouldn't have shown what a lot of us knew.
    Somebody will start wanting to slow pintos down.
    In my case it doesn't necessarily show on the track! With a faster driver it would be a different situation, but I do enjoy it.

  21. #414
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    Word is that sealed Zetecs in the pro series vary from 151 to 153. Just saying...

    Looks like the real problem is only that people aren't going racing with the rule set they have.

  22. #415
    Contributing Member hdsporty1988's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.01.16
    Location
    Paddock Lake WI
    Posts
    485
    Liked: 193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eospeed View Post


    Here is a long rod pinto off of our dyno with all the legal updates.I think this would run with a zetec well.
    It would be interesting to see a top driver in a car powered by one to see what happens against the Zetecs.

  23. #416
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    Niki, the last great pinto pilot, went off to build things out of concrete.

    But, flashing back to 2005. I can picture Cole in their DB-6 with wings and 153 HP. Certainly would be interesting.

  24. #417
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,153
    Liked: 1245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hdsporty1988 View Post
    It would be interesting to see a top driver in a car powered by one to see what happens against the Zetecs.
    A great test would be 2 2001 VDs. Same driver, same tires, etc.

    Added:
    Thinking about this more I'd prefer a test with an average driver. Consistent but average.
    After all, who is the guy choosing between the pinto and the zetec. We're not looking for records, just the advantage of one engine over another.
    A top driver would probably yield too close a result.
    Last edited by BeerBudgetRacing; 01.23.19 at 8:09 PM.

  25. #418
    Contributing Member RobLav's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.05.00
    Location
    Somerset, Kentucky
    Posts
    2,914
    Liked: 126

    Default

    Best Pinto dyno results I ever saw (Farley's), but there seems to be variation in the dynos. The QS one looks pretty good too.

    If someone's got a good Pinto FC at a reasonable price, I'm interested. Mid-to-Southeast US.

    I am looking for a car... reviewing FB, FC, and PFM cars. But at this point in life I'd be happy tooling around in a cheaper Pinto FC with analog dash.

  26. #419
    Contributing Member hdsporty1988's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.01.16
    Location
    Paddock Lake WI
    Posts
    485
    Liked: 193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobLav View Post
    Best Pinto dyno results I ever saw (Farley's), but there seems to be variation in the dynos. The QS one looks pretty good too.

    If someone's got a good Pinto FC at a reasonable price, I'm interested. Mid-to-Southeast US.

    I am looking for a car... reviewing FB, FC, and PFM cars. But at this point in life I'd be happy tooling around in a cheaper Pinto FC with analog dash.
    The SE-3 that was just put up for sale should work nicely!

  27. The following members LIKED this post:


  28. #420
    Contributing Member RobLav's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.05.00
    Location
    Somerset, Kentucky
    Posts
    2,914
    Liked: 126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hdsporty1988 View Post
    The SE-3 that was just put up for sale should work nicely!
    Too tight! Thanks for pointing it out.

  29. #421
    Member douglap1's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.07.12
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    94
    Liked: 78

    Default

    I am definitely looking forward to getting my RF97's Pinto engine back with the latest upgrades soon. I'll post a dyno sheet when available.

  30. #422
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,153
    Liked: 1245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eospeed View Post
    Here is a long rod pinto off of our dyno with all the legal updates.I think this would run with a zetec well.
    Curious as to why the curves don't cross at the magic 5250 on this motor.

  31. #423
    Contributing Member Latebraker's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.11.06
    Location
    British columbia Canada
    Posts
    126
    Liked: 25

    Default Pinto Engine

    Quote Originally Posted by hdsporty1988 View Post
    Anyone got a dyno sheet from a Zetec or a long stroke Pinto? Here is mine from a regular Pinto with the upgraded cam rebuilt by Farley in July. I know dyno's vary, but it would still be good to compare curves. anyone willing to share?
    I will post a dyno sheet of a Zetec when i get it for a comparison on hp and torque curve but i'm still want an answer to my question about the flywheel weights as a cheap fix to help improve Pinto out the hole grunt. This isn't about hp numbers or which dyno can or engine can out hp the other or what driver can make a Pinto keep up with a Zetec.
    The reality is the Zetec engines being built are cheater engines according to the SCCA rules that no blueprinting is allowed and aren't being enforced so why the strangle hold on the Pinto to be legal and force the owns to spend thousands of dollars in costly upgrades that are for one limit to one size piston. Not like we can just go to the junkyard and pickup a bunch of blocks and cranks or cylinder heads for the Pinto like you can the Zetec.

  32. #424
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    04.07.07
    Location
    Placentia, CA
    Posts
    529
    Liked: 341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeerBudgetRacing View Post
    Curious as to why the curves don't cross at the magic 5250 on this motor.

    Something appears off with the numbers in general.

    Power = Torque * RPM / 5252
    Torque = Power / RPM * 5252
    RPM = Power / Torque * 5252

    With the data in the window (I assume that is the peak hp and the associated torque with the RPM at which the peak power occurred)

    153.2 <> 115.9 * 6593.9 / 5252

    Either the hp = 145.1 (115.9 * 6593.9 / 5252) or torque = 122.0 (153.2 / 6593.9 * 5252) or RPM = 6942.2 (153.2 / 115.9 * 5252)

    Or... the data in that window is not what I think it is.

    Eric (math is fun) Little

  33. #425
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,480
    Liked: 1462

    Default

    154 for Al head, 32/36, std cam, std rods, legal flywheel, from Butler's

  34. #426
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    05.11.07
    Location
    Southeast MI
    Posts
    735
    Liked: 254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeerBudgetRacing View Post
    Curious as to why the curves don't cross at the magic 5250 on this motor.
    The torque curve appears to be shifted upward to make it more easily visible. I've noticed the same on each of the QS dyno sheets I've received. Otherwise, the torque signal isn't on the chart.

  35. #427
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.05.06
    Location
    Frederick MD
    Posts
    240
    Liked: 27

    Default

    That sheet is scaled for HP not TQ.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Little View Post
    Something appears off with the numbers in general.

    Power = Torque * RPM / 5252
    Torque = Power / RPM * 5252
    RPM = Power / Torque * 5252

    With the data in the window (I assume that is the peak hp and the associated torque with the RPM at which the peak power occurred)

    153.2 <> 115.9 * 6593.9 / 5252

    Either the hp = 145.1 (115.9 * 6593.9 / 5252) or torque = 122.0 (153.2 / 6593.9 * 5252) or RPM = 6942.2 (153.2 / 115.9 * 5252)

    Or... the data in that window is not what I think it is.

    Eric (math is fun) Little

  36. #428
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    Flywheel...

    I sort of remember the history.
    A few years back we attempted to improve the Pinto. The new cam, adjustable pulley, lighter flywheel, etc, etc.
    Elite was selling a professionally made flywheel that I believe was 10 lb.
    And a bunch of us who were lightening the stock ones on lathes thought that 10 lb was about the safe limit before they would start exploding.
    So... the committee picked 10 lb.
    That way the do-it-yourself guys would have an inexpensive option.

    Double jeopardy... If we picked a unit that was lighter than 10 lb, then the masses would scream that we were forcing them to have to buy an expensive unit. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

    Flaming became one of the reasons a lot of experienced racers have retired from volunteering on rules committees.



  37. The following 4 users liked this post:


  38. #429
    Senior Member kea's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.17.00
    Location
    madison heights,mi
    Posts
    3,261
    Liked: 592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latebraker View Post
    The reality is the Zetec engines being built are cheater engines according to the SCCA rules that no blueprinting is allowed and aren't being enforced .
    Which is why I recommend the Zetec min weight be increased.
    Keith
    Averill Racing Stuff, Inc.
    www.racing-stuff.com
    248-585-9139

  39. #430
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    This is a typical January thread. The age old pinto vs. zetec debate.

    Think about this. The committee, when poling the engine builders a few years back, came to the conclusion that the new rules set really is close to making the pinto the over dog. Increase the combustion ratio a tick and it would be for sure.

    It is the opinion of many that if a new rules pinto were installed in a modern car, and you install one of the top drivers it would be very competitive.

    We are about as close as you can get matching an iron 2 valve engine to a aluminum 4 valve engine.

    There are some that believe it is time to move forward again, maybe a 1.5 liter with a small turbo...
    Something that reflects more current technology.

  40. #431
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,768
    Liked: 3772

    Default

    Today we are at the point that current production engines exceed the power of what were state-of-the-art race engines a few years ago.

    For example... Take FIA rules for formula cars. If you exceed 300 HP then the chassis must meet the higher F! style crash standards.
    Many current production 2 liter motors must be de-tuned to stay under that threshold.


    Seems crazy to be spending tons to replicate old Toyota engines for FA at very high dollars, when crate/junk yard engines are available.

    As always... YMMV

  41. #432
    Contributing Member marshall9's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.15.02
    Location
    Glendale, Arizona
    Posts
    2,204
    Liked: 501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Frog View Post
    This is a typical January thread. The age old pinto vs. zetec debate.

    It is the opinion of many that if a new rules pinto were installed in a modern car, and you install one of the top drivers it would be very competitive.


    I agree. My new rules Pinto is night and day from the last gen one.

  42. #433
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    04.07.07
    Location
    Placentia, CA
    Posts
    529
    Liked: 341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eospeed View Post
    That sheet is scaled for HP not TQ.
    Thanks Erik. I have to admit, that makes me more curious. I am not an engine builder but I do have a pretty decent background in math. So I hope you don't mind educating me on this.

    If power is a calculation that is not directly measured and torque and RPM are directly measured, what is being scaled, how, and why to produce numbers in the tables that will not compute to the formula for power?

    Sorry to be a dunce but I really do enjoy learning and I am guessing that I may not be the only one that does not understand this scaling (if I am, then perhaps I am the same guy that asked Beerbudget if he adjusts cam timing from the cockpit. I can but I have to loosen the arm restraints a lot to get to it )

    Thanks
    Eric Little

  43. #434
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.05.06
    Location
    Frederick MD
    Posts
    240
    Liked: 27

    Default

    We have a custom CDS data system Peter made for us on our dyno. It plots the HP and TQ on different graphs so to read the actual TQ value I need to tab over to the tq scale.The power is calculated the same way it is just displayed on 2 different graphs and I didnt feel like scanning 2 sheets.So your right with both curves on the HP scale they do not cross in the normal place I should have cut the TQ curve out and posted a separate sheet for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Little View Post
    Thanks Erik. I have to admit, that makes me more curious. I am not an engine builder but I do have a pretty decent background in math. So I hope you don't mind educating me on this.

    If power is a calculation that is not directly measured and torque and RPM are directly measured, what is being scaled, how, and why to produce numbers in the tables that will not compute to the formula for power?

    Sorry to be a dunce but I really do enjoy learning and I am guessing that I may not be the only one that does not understand this scaling (if I am, then perhaps I am the same guy that asked Beerbudget if he adjusts cam timing from the cockpit. I can but I have to loosen the arm restraints a lot to get to it )

    Thanks
    Eric Little

  44. The following 2 users liked this post:


  45. #435
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Little View Post
    Thanks Erik. I have to admit, that makes me more curious. I am not an engine builder but I do have a pretty decent background in math. So I hope you don't mind educating me on this.

    If power is a calculation that is not directly measured and torque and RPM are directly measured, what is being scaled, how, and why to produce numbers in the tables that will not compute to the formula for power?

    Sorry to be a dunce but I really do enjoy learning and I am guessing that I may not be the only one that does not understand this scaling (if I am, then perhaps I am the same guy that asked Beerbudget if he adjusts cam timing from the cockpit. I can but I have to loosen the arm restraints a lot to get to it )

    Thanks
    Eric Little
    The scale on the Y-axis is for HP. No numbers for TQ curve plotted. In other words, the motor did not make 155TQ at 5200 RPM nor did it make 151TQ at 5800.
    Last edited by Daryl DeArman; 01.24.19 at 1:27 PM.

  46. #436
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.05.06
    Location
    Frederick MD
    Posts
    240
    Liked: 27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    The scale on the Y-axis if for HP. No numbers for TQ curve plotted. In other words, the motor did not make 155TQ at 5200 RPM nor did it make 151TQ at 5800.

    Correct it is only plotted for HP

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social