Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 51
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default The Mother Lode- Road Amercia

    As no one seems to be talking about it, does that mean no ones going?

    One the greatest racetracks in America, and no discussion on it? Nobody going to the runoffs this year?
    We had had Atlanta for many years, then Mid Ohio for several more, and now we are going to a track that will make you think your at the Nurenburgring. And no discussion? Does everyone have this track figured out? You must cause not much discussion. That one test day going to sort it out? Let me know when you take the kink flat out, cause I want to have a lawn chair and popcorn in hand to watch! Or if your class can, the carousel flat (it's not the line that counts)...maybe not the popcorn but the lawn chair for the amount of time spent in it.
    How about the missing Micthell bridge? Gone! Is it flat?
    New pavement on the outside of one, eight.? Can you go there?

    Three miles of straightaway, with one mile of corners, are you ready? Got enough horsepower to climb out of 14 and draft somebody into one? Got brakes and hind sight to find the braking zone for 5? Will you run wing or without it...?

    BTW, if you don't have suspension sensors, you'll wonder why your braking don't work in someplaces and why you can't remove downforce in others (when you could)
    As no one seems to be talking about it, does that mean no ones going?
    Last edited by George Main; 08.29.09 at 2:00 AM.
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  2. #2
    Global Moderator Bill Bonow's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Plainfield, IL
    Posts
    2,663
    Liked: 190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    ...that will make you think your at the Nurenburgring.
    Isn't that where the Nazi war crimes trials took place?

    Der Nurburgring - Nordschleife and no, running Road America never made me think I was at the Green Hell, not even at tiny bit.
    Bill Bonow
    "Wait, which one is the gas pedal again?"

  3. #3
    Senior Member Stan Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.14.03
    Location
    Mooresville NC area
    Posts
    4,157
    Liked: 309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    As no one seems to be talking about it, does that mean no ones going?
    No...it means we aren't talking about how we're going to tackle it.
    Stan Clayton
    Stohr Cars

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Bonow View Post
    Isn't that where the Nazi war crimes trials took place?

    Der Nurburgring - Nordschleife and no, running Road America never made me think I was at the Green Hell, not even at tiny bit.
    There's only one Nordschleife, green hell as you put it. My comments and comparison was tongue in cheek....

    The biggest decision most will have to make, if you have wings or adjustable aero will be to run with more or with less. The best place to make that decision IMO will be how the car responds to the change in the carousel. Theres a "rise" in the first half of it and slightly downhill in the second half of it. Less or more wing will show if it's a benefit or not, half way from entry to this rise, with the rise causing it's own problem (with less wing most often) and then the second half presents it's own problems, as there is a slight off camber to it, (downhill).
    If you have suspension sensors, pay perticular attention to the rear suspension, as there are a succession of bumps in the first half that will throw a wrench into your aero program.
    There have been several track records set with opposite routes of thinking in aero. Though the majority of them have been set with less aero (three miles of straightaway) but to do so, making the car balanced and maintaining mechanical grip in the carousel is a double edged sword. IMHO
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,432
    Liked: 68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Let me know when you take the kink flat out, cause I want to have a lawn chair and popcorn in hand to watch!
    I took it flat today (have the data to prove it), and I still came in 5th in class. Once you can take it flat, you still have to figure out how to scrub the least amount of speed - that's the real challenge.

    Or if your class can, the carousel flat (it's not the line that counts)...maybe not the popcorn but the lawn chair for the amount of time spent in it.
    Now, if you could show me how to tak the carousel flat in an FE, I'm all ears!

    New pavement on the outside of one, eight.? Can you go there?
    Only if you don't mind coming in with loose suspension bolts after every session. It's nice added runoff area for when you need it, but the rumble bumps are enough to keep you from gaining anything (at least it seems that way to me and my meager experience).

    Got brakes and hind sight to find the braking zone for 5? Will you run wing or without it...?
    5 is easy: wait until you know you probably can't make the corner, go one marker more, then brake hard, downshift and turn. You have enough runoff that a mistake here is just really embarassing (because everyone having lunch on the hill will be watching), not expensive.
    Marshall Mauney

    Milwaukee Region

  6. #6
    Administrator dc's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.24.00
    Location
    Chicagoland, Illinois
    Posts
    5,526
    Liked: 1417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Let me know when you take the kink flat out, cause I want to have a lawn chair and popcorn in hand to watch! Or if your class can, the carousel flat (it's not the line that counts)...maybe not the popcorn but the lawn chair for the amount of time spent in it.
    If I'm not mistaken, just about every class represented on this board takes the Kink flat out. I don't know if anyone does the Carousel flat out, though.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Allen_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.05.03
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    503
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Like Marshall, I have data to show we took the kink flat this weekend. Unfortunately, as the world turns, this was not the same weekend I could take the carousel flat--my fronts were toast, and the understeer in the carousel (and six and fourteen and thirteen and one and seven and so one) pretty much scotched that thought.

    As to RA, it is my favorite track. It is not as god-awful challenging as Grattan, but I doubt I will ever have it half figured out. I think, on the other hand, that Tim Kautz has it pretty much figured in a Ford. I love to watch him on this track . . . for the millisecond I get to watch when he blows by me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Carter View Post
    If I'm not mistaken, just about every class represented on this board takes the Kink flat out. I don't know if anyone does the Carousel flat out, though.

  8. #8
    Fallen Friend
    Join Date
    12.05.05
    Location
    Columbus Ohio
    Posts
    167
    Liked: 33

    Default

    I regularly did the carousel flat out in my FE at the June Sprints, just had to lift the last few laps of the race as the tires lost grip.
    Scott

  9. #9
    Contributing Member iamuwere's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.26.05
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    1,389
    Liked: 106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mazda17 View Post
    I regularly did the carousel flat out in my FE at the June Sprints, just had to lift the last few laps of the race as the tires lost grip.
    Scott
    Flat out as in no braking before the corner or lift going into it or flat out once the car sets?

    jim

  10. #10
    Fallen Friend
    Join Date
    12.05.05
    Location
    Columbus Ohio
    Posts
    167
    Liked: 33

    Default

    Flat out as in exit turn 8 flat out and no braking or lifting at all until the entry of Canada corner.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Allen_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.05.03
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    503
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mazda17 View Post
    Flat out as in exit turn 8 flat out and no braking or lifting at all until the entry of Canada corner.
    Exactly. That is the thing.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,432
    Liked: 68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mazda17 View Post
    I regularly did the carousel flat out in my FE at the June Sprints, just had to lift the last few laps of the race as the tires lost grip.
    Scott
    I won't question this given your laptimes, but how the @#$% can you do that?

    I can't keep the front tires sticking. Halfway through the carousel, it just gives up and wants to go out into the marbles. Of course, shortly after I lift to put grip on the front, it starts to stick again and I feel too slow.....
    Marshall Mauney

    Milwaukee Region

  13. #13
    Senior Member Allen_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.05.03
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    503
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshall Mauney View Post
    I won't question this given your laptimes, but how the @#$% can you do that?

    I can't keep the front tires sticking. Halfway through the carousel, it just gives up and wants to go out into the marbles. Of course, shortly after I lift to put grip on the front, it starts to stick again and I feel too slow.....
    Sadly Marshall, even in a lowly FF I know this feeling all too well--marbles and grass beyond OR lift a bit . . . sigh.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Rennie Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.30.03
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    611
    Liked: 1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Carter View Post
    If I'm not mistaken, just about every class represented on this board takes the Kink flat out. I don't know if anyone does the Carousel flat out, though.

    Guilty as charged... flat from the exit of 8 to the entry of Canada Corner.


    Cheers,
    Rennie

  15. #15
    Fallen Friend
    Join Date
    12.05.05
    Location
    Columbus Ohio
    Posts
    167
    Liked: 33

    Default

    It's a secret

  16. #16
    Contributing Member rickb99's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.24.02
    Location
    Tacoma, Washington
    Posts
    4,913
    Liked: 210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Carter View Post
    ....I don't know if anyone does the Carousel flat out, though.
    Hmmm, I watched a LOT of the videos from the June Sprints. I didn't see any body doing the Carousel 'FLAT OUT'.. Yes, no braking but feathering the throttle most of the way around.

    Where's a video of a FLAT OUT acceleration through the Carousel??? Maybe in an FV or perhaps an FF (maybe).
    CREW for Jeff 89 Reynard or Flag & Comm.

  17. #17
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.24.08
    Location
    Cedarburg, WI
    Posts
    1,950
    Liked: 86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rickb99 View Post
    Hmmm, I watched a LOT of the videos from the June Sprints. I didn't see any body doing the Carousel 'FLAT OUT'.. Yes, no braking but feathering the throttle most of the way around.

    Where's a video of a FLAT OUT acceleration through the Carousel??? Maybe in an FV or perhaps an FF (maybe).
    The only way to prove it is to show us a throttle trace! Definitely can be done in a FV.
    Matt King
    FV19 Citation XTC-41
    CenDiv-Milwaukee
    KEEP THE KINK!

  18. #18
    Fallen Friend
    Join Date
    12.05.05
    Location
    Columbus Ohio
    Posts
    167
    Liked: 33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rickb99 View Post
    Hmmm, I watched a LOT of the videos from the June Sprints. I didn't see any body doing the Carousel 'FLAT OUT'.. Yes, no braking but feathering the throttle most of the way around.

    Where's a video of a FLAT OUT acceleration through the Carousel??? Maybe in an FV or perhaps an FF (maybe).
    Come to the Hippi Racing paddock at the Runoffs and I will show you a flat out throttle trace in an FE all the way from turn 8 to Canada Corner.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    11.17.05
    Location
    GingerMan Raceway, Michigan
    Posts
    700
    Liked: 14

    Default

    oh yeah, flat carousel is done all the time, i learned watching the pro's on tv, watch the "pro" line, a good line to me means that you are almost in the "marble zone"on entry, Road America and the Chicago Region have the best safety crew , they go to work fast!! today a Pro Mazda came out of 7 very squirly , hit the right wall on exit and the car exploded in front of us, i hope the driver is ok, local yellow for turn 7 for 3 laps, two safety trucks and crew cleaned up the mess with cars zooming by, i was hoping for a full course, it was a little too much, god bless.

    the bridge is not there anymore, it is true flatness from curb to curb, i think turn one is never talked about, T1 is mean too. jrm

  20. #20
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.01.00
    Location
    streetsboro, ohio usa
    Posts
    906
    Liked: 100

    Default

    any top running FC takes the carousel totally flat.
    for me, i don't want even a hint of understeer there. i prefer to have the car set up so it has a hint of oversteer that i can control with the steering. if you can't take it flat, it will definitely show in your lap times.

    mark d

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rickb99 View Post
    Hmmm, I watched a LOT of the videos from the June Sprints. I didn't see any body doing the Carousel 'FLAT OUT'.. Yes, no braking but feathering the throttle most of the way around.

    Where's a video of a FLAT OUT acceleration through the Carousel??? Maybe in an FV or perhaps an FF (maybe).
    A Formula Atllantic. flat in the Carousel, will "sound" as though it's rolling out of the throttle (with the pedal to the wood) due to the G loading scrubing speed off the car, same happens with most cars.

    Take that same atlantic car, and peel off aero, so much that the carosel becomes difficult to stay flat. In 1996 we removed Patrick Carpentier's rear upper element (RT41) completely in practice, we went 1.4 seconds slower than we had before. But the advantages in straight line speed were there, and we "discovered" a key suspension movement that removing the rear wing had caused. We tried it again in qualifying with the new suspensions settings, and destroyed the track record.
    Both the carousel and even the Kink were challenging to remain flat in both, as the speed difference was so much higher.
    If wasn't for suspension data, where the handling faults were found that were caused by removing the wing, we would not have tried it again in qualifying.

    Doug is correct, most, if not all cars at this website should be flat in both the carousel and especially the kink. Though as you "push" the envelope of the aero, it will become more and more difficult to do so. IMHO
    Last edited by George Main; 08.31.09 at 2:47 PM. Reason: add comments
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    For those that haven't been to this track before, if it rains, make sure you at least go around the track a few times so that you figure out the puddles and streams that will occur. The risk of starting a race in the rain and not having been around it in the rain, will catch you by surprise in a few places here:

    Turn 1, the last "rise" that blocks your vision of the braking area for one, can develope huge puddles and deep sometimes, just after the rise. Not the best place for a "surprise".

    Turn 2 entry, turn 5 braking, 6 just before entry, 7 through out, mitchell corner entry all develop streams.

    Canada, and turn 8 tend to have a lot of puddles, Canada in the braking zone, 8 apex and out.

    From the Kink to exiting Canada, the track is surrounded and "covered" with trees and can stay wet even though the rest of the track has dried.

    Just like Atlanta, it is also possible for it to rain on one side of the track and be completely dry on the other.IMHO
    Last edited by George Main; 08.31.09 at 2:48 PM. Reason: add comments
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark defer View Post
    any top running FC takes the carousel totally flat.
    for me, i don't want even a hint of understeer there. i prefer to have the car set up so it has a hint of oversteer that i can control with the steering. if you can't take it flat, it will definitely show in your lap times.

    mark d
    Which conditiion is faster? Which condition will have more confidence? My mentor and good friend, Bob Lobenberg once got into this discussion on U/S vs O/S (they were talking about turn 1 at Atlanta) and whether the "loose/O/S is fast" statement is really all that's made up to be. His response was that, for him, once you have a little O/S, are you going to press harder the next time around, thus creating more O/S? Will you have the confidence to do so? Bob seems to think that a little U/S is far more confident to the driver when dealing with very fast corners, as you can still get to a neutral state, by pushing harder and rotating the car, knowing that the U/S will happen. With O/S, it is only bravery that separates whether you will go quicker the next lap.
    When I've coached drivers on corners that we know are flat out, but the driver isn't able to do so yet, having a little U/S "built" into the car is a much safer way to get someone to go flat.
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  24. #24
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.01.00
    Location
    streetsboro, ohio usa
    Posts
    906
    Liked: 100

    Default

    yes, but if you've already worked up to being flat out, there is no pushing to go farther next time thru the corner. and since we seem to loose front grip first as the tires wear, i don't want to start out with an understeer that's only going to get worse. do that and you won't be flat out by the end of the race.

    mark d

  25. #25
    Senior Member andyllc's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.01.01
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    1,008
    Liked: 195

    Default

    In general terms I would absolutely prefer a little U/S compared to O/S. However in the carousel, it seems if your car understeers it just gets worse and worse and just wants to plow off the track, that is one turn where I would prefer a touch of oversteer if I had to choose one.

  26. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark defer View Post
    yes, but if you've already worked up to being flat out, there is no pushing to go farther next time thru the corner. and since we seem to loose front grip first as the tires wear, i don't want to start out with an understeer that's only going to get worse. do that and you won't be flat out by the end of the race.

    mark d
    "since we seem to loose front grip first as the tires wear"


    Is this because of the tire design? or because of how you have setup the car? Only makes sense that if you can't change the tire personality (compound choice,pressures, camber, growth, etc.) then I can see your point.
    Even in an FE, has some things you can do to change the character of how the tire wears. Though sometimes it requires thinking outside of the box.....
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  27. #27
    Senior Member Rennie Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.30.03
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    611
    Liked: 1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Which conditiion is faster? Which condition will have more confidence? My mentor and good friend, Bob Lobenberg once got into this discussion on U/S vs O/S (they were talking about turn 1 at Atlanta) and whether the "loose/O/S is fast" statement is really all that's made up to be. His response was that, for him, once you have a little O/S, are you going to press harder the next time around, thus creating more O/S? Will you have the confidence to do so? Bob seems to think that a little U/S is far more confident to the driver when dealing with very fast corners, as you can still get to a neutral state, by pushing harder and rotating the car, knowing that the U/S will happen. With O/S, it is only bravery that separates whether you will go quicker the next lap.
    When I've coached drivers on corners that we know are flat out, but the driver isn't able to do so yet, having a little U/S "built" into the car is a much safer way to get someone to go flat.
    Two "which" questions to kick it off, and yet one short: which driver?

    All of the stability baselines and car behaviours which you (correctly) indicate are "modifiable" by the driver are all predicated on the tendencies of the driver to behave a certain way behind the wheel. This is why particular setups do not work well for particular drivers, and also why some drivers adapt well to a multitude of setups (although that driver is rare indeed). I suspect you know this though.

    The converse of what you've written above is also true, in terms of setup direction - a driver may induce understeer at will to a car which otherwise exhibits oversteer, by virtue of changing his / her technique. No bravery needed, just a change in technique.

    I am being careful not to try to answer the question of "which is quicker", because I believe it depends on the combination of setup and driver tendencies. Is there a theoretical fastest? Almost certainly. Would the car be drivable by a human with that setup? Different story.


    Cheers,
    Rennie

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rennie Clayton View Post
    Two "which" questions to kick it off, and yet one short: which driver?

    All of the stability baselines and car behaviours which you (correctly) indicate are "modifiable" by the driver are all predicated on the tendencies of the driver to behave a certain way behind the wheel. This is why particular setups do not work well for particular drivers, and also why some drivers adapt well to a multitude of setups (although that driver is rare indeed). I suspect you know this though.

    The converse of what you've written above is also true, in terms of setup direction - a driver may induce understeer at will to a car which otherwise exhibits oversteer, by virtue of changing his / her technique. No bravery needed, just a change in technique.

    I am being careful not to try to answer the question of "which is quicker", because I believe it depends on the combination of setup and driver tendencies. Is there a theoretical fastest? Almost certainly. Would the car be drivable by a human with that setup? Different story.


    Cheers,
    Rennie
    The quickest way is a neutral car all the way through, and the most confident. Though the handling differences I'm describing are "which end will give up first".
    If your flat and your slightly O/S'ing, and your drafting a car into and through the carousel, that O/S will become a lot of O/S. Having the front go into a slight U/S when pushed is a little more confident to the driver,( depends on who you are) and can be managed much easier (you can rotate the car) to get passed the U/S. With O/S, your kinda stuck with the situation, and the length of rolling back the throttle to keep the car on the track vs a "quick" lift in and out (enough to rotate) to correct a U/S condition.
    What happens if the tracks get slippery due to oil (can you say "darn GT1 guys, how much oil do they carry anyways?), different types of rubber or moisture
    Which handling condition is more manageable in changing track conditions?
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  29. #29
    Senior Member Brian.Novak's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.10.07
    Location
    Detroit, Mi
    Posts
    289
    Liked: 20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mazda17 View Post
    Come to the Hippi Racing paddock at the Runoffs and I will show you a flat out throttle trace in an FE all the way from turn 8 to Canada Corner.
    Yup! Can be done, although I don't think my car handles it as well as yours!

    Could do it in the F500 also.

  30. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,432
    Liked: 68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian.Novak View Post
    Yup! Can be done, although I don't think my car handles it as well as yours!


    Marshall Mauney

    Milwaukee Region

  31. #31
    Senior Member Rennie Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.30.03
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    611
    Liked: 1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Which handling condition is more manageable in changing track conditions?
    We talking about making the car go fast, or making it comfortable to drive?


    Cheers,
    Rennie

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rennie Clayton View Post
    We talking about making the car go fast, or making it comfortable to drive?


    Cheers,
    Rennie
    "Tricking" the car to do something will, more often than not, also trick the driver at some point.

    A well balanced, confident car that is easy to drive fast with a capable driver will win out most of the time over a car that has been "tricked" into it's speed.
    A small example of "tricking" the car? pre-load and packers.... sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. The balanced easy to drive car always works with less surprises. In the heat of battle, which driver will make the least amount of mistakes? Which car will get pushed to 11/10ths more often?
    In my mind, if the driver is confident in his/her car, pushing the limits of it is much easier than pushing a car that will suddenly do something that is unexpected..
    IMHO
    Last edited by George Main; 09.02.09 at 8:20 AM.
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  33. #33
    Senior Member Rennie Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.30.03
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    611
    Liked: 1

    Default

    George,

    Who said anything about "tricks"? Not I...

    For the record, spring preload is diabolical, and I've never been a fan of packers for a variety of reasons. I even go so far as to find coil springs distasteful because one is constantly fiddling with getting spring slack just right, or your droop may vary from side to side... just a mess to deal with sometimes. Anyway, for most drivers, giving them a nice docile car in the 3-5hz range with a moderate forward bias in ride rate, a narrow forward bias on roll rate, and overshooting critical damping by, what, 50% on an aero car will give them something to chew on for hours. It will be quite easy to drive, very consistent up to 98% of the ultimate limit, docile and linear when pushed over the limit, and assuming all the mechanical bells & whistles have been properly looked after, it won't give any real surprises. Adjust to the peculiarities of the track without going overboard, and more often than not, you end up with a race winner on your hands.

    Perhaps we should distinguish here between steady state and dynamic state? Neutral is desirable in steady state, and we are both in agreement there. Better to have a car which breaks loose at both ends simultaneously. Some drivers are comfortable with a car that oversteers; most are not. What are your thoughts on how the car reacts in dynamic state? In general, I am talking about stability factors, and I do not refer to behaviours which are inconsistent or surprising. For instance, I presume you are an advocate of rearward weight bias, although that is inherently unstable from a dynamic response perspective.


    Cheers,
    Rennie

  34. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    11.17.05
    Location
    GingerMan Raceway, Michigan
    Posts
    700
    Liked: 14

    Default

    George

    I much rather have a car that is comfortable or neutral, than a car that is designed to understeer or O/S halfway through the race. ??? I mean how can a car go from understeering to oversteering in just 13 laps?? maybe the tires go away? the driver gets tired or thinks about other things? really how can i make my car o/s at the start and then have a few laps when it understeers, i mean really.

    I hear the Nascar guys talking about the car getting tight or loose at the end of a 50 lap run, thats just tires eh. you can always induce the two conditions above with less/more steering input, point of entry & speed

  35. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Sorry, been very busy in the last two weeks...

    Quote Originally Posted by Rennie Clayton View Post
    George,

    Who said anything about "tricks"? Not I...
    No, you didn't imply any tricks, I did, as I have seen many who in the course of setting up a car attempt to "trick it" to do something. In some cases, as with an FE or Sports "rambo" where the springs, ARBs, and tires etc., are set Or Formula Mazda, where selections are also limited. Tricking the car has, once again become a "mode" of setup that some regularly go down this path in "most situations" rather than just a few times.


    For the record, spring preload is diabolical, and I've never been a fan of packers for a variety of reasons. I even go so far as to find coil springs distasteful because one is constantly fiddling with getting spring slack just right, or your droop may vary from side to side... just a mess to deal with sometimes.
    Agreed, though there have been instances were it's worked, but most involve flat racetracks that have the bumps in the right places...


    Anyway, for most drivers, giving them a nice docile car in the 3-5hz range with a moderate forward bias in ride rate, a narrow forward bias on roll rate, and overshooting critical damping by, what, 50% on an aero car will give them something to chew on for hours. It will be quite easy to drive, very consistent up to 98% of the ultimate limit, docile and linear when pushed over the limit, and assuming all the mechanical bells & whistles have been properly looked after, it won't give any real surprises. Adjust to the peculiarities of the track without going overboard, and more often than not, you end up with a race winner on your hands.
    Agreed, though don't agree on the overdampening, except in very special cases,. IE- a Porsche cup car can respond very well to this, but has to do with engine location and the "little" chance of jacking the car down.

    Perhaps we should distinguish here between steady state and dynamic state? Neutral is desirable in steady state, and we are both in agreement there. Better to have a car which breaks loose at both ends simultaneously. Some drivers are comfortable with a car that oversteers; most are not. What are your thoughts on how the car reacts in dynamic state? In general, I am talking about stability factors, and I do not refer to behaviours which are inconsistent or surprising. For instance, I presume you are an advocate of rearward weight bias, although that is inherently unstable from a dynamic response perspective.
    Interesting, don't you think? That when a driver debriefs, the steady state is the least likely to be brought up and the dynamic movements are the ones most complained of? (usually the instances where he saved his rear end) Yet in setup we try to achieve the longest possible steady state conditiions and reduce and control the dynamic movements. Sometimes in controling dynamic movements we reduce the steady state, one way by overdampening (some use shocks to control all aspects of handling, IMHO, a mistake) or flooding the car with aero to mask a problem, IMHO, also a mistake.
    A shocks greatest importance and effect happens mostly in such low percentage in one corner of a track (initial turn in and power on exit) and though the shocks do effect the car in other parts of the corner, the importance of them should only be "heightened" after you already have a very balanced car, irrespective of the shock adjustments.
    A great experiment is to spend a test day with a set of dead shocks (low enough pressure that low speed control is not functioning) and purely attack the handling through your spring, bar, camber, caster, rake, air pressure and geometric adjustments. If the car has aero (wings), removing or greatly reducing their effect, that also can allow a focus purely on mechanical grip. (Though not removing tunnels or diffusers)
    Though not a route to a well setup car, the learning process of this increases the dynamic movements that may be masked or "patched" by other elements that aren't as important to achieving a well balanced car and "targets" the effect that the shocks and the wings have on the car when they are brought individual back into the package...

    An added effect of this kind of testing, is that the driver relates to each of the changes and what he has to change (driving wise) as all the dynamic movements are greatly increased and once they become smaller again are much easier realized in their individual effect on the car.
    Last edited by George Main; 09.16.09 at 4:56 PM.
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  36. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JRMarchand View Post
    George

    I much rather have a car that is comfortable or neutral, than a car that is designed to understeer or O/S halfway through the race. ??? I mean how can a car go from understeering to oversteering in just 13 laps?? maybe the tires go away? the driver gets tired or thinks about other things? really how can i make my car o/s at the start and then have a few laps when it understeers, i mean really.
    It is possible to have a neutral car which is setup so that when pressed too hard (11 tenths?) will go into an understeering condition rather than the more "natural" oversteering condition of a rear engine car.
    I haven't mentioned anything about a car going from under steer to over steer, and in fact won't know how to achieve that unless it was the natural life span of the tires.

    I hear the Nascar guys talking about the car getting tight or loose at the end of a 50 lap run, thats just tires eh. you can always induce the two conditions above with less/more steering input, point of entry & speed
    Not exactly what I or Bob L. meant either. If the choice was a car that will go into over steer (many believe this is fastest) when pressed VS a car that will go into under steer when pressed.
    A neutral car is the goal, and is fastest and the most comfortable to drive. Though the discussion is when a neutral car is pressed even harder than 10 tenths. The chances of a rear engine car remaining neutral are very low and will tend to head into over steer. That is unless the car has been set in such a way that the car will under steer (from a neutral state)

    Though how do you turn an over steering car to begin with, into a car that is understeering or neutral.... without slowing down (much less throttle) at any point when at ten tenths throughout a corner?
    My point is that when you take a corner at 10ths and the car is setup to have an over steer, you as a driver are not going to go any quicker on the next lap by pushing the O/S envelope. Though if it was a slight understeer instead, the level of confidence is higher that you can achieve a neutral car even when pushing the car harder and faster into the corner.
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  37. #37
    Contributing Member TimW's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.30.03
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    2,570
    Liked: 23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Though how do you turn an over steering car to begin with, into a car that is understeering or neutral.... without slowing down (much less throttle) at any point when at ten tenths throughout a corner?

    My point is that when you take a corner at 10ths and the car is setup to have an over steer, you as a driver are not going to go any quicker on the next lap by pushing the O/S envelope. Though if it was a slight understeer instead, the level of confidence is higher that you can achieve a neutral car even when pushing the car harder and faster into the corner.
    So, I think this is more of a social engineering phenomena than an engineering phenomena, which is fundamentally a lot of what a race engineer is responsible to do. However, it doesn't seem to work universally with all drivers this way in my experience. Since a neutral car is so hard if ever to attain, you must choose which side of neutral you're willing to live with. While a car with understeer can (though not always) instill confidence, at a place like the speedway it just scrubs speed and slows you down. Sure if feels safer to be able turn the wheel more sometimes but with the wall coming at you quickly it may also not give a driver confidence to be more aggressive.

    Its been my experience that a car that is controllably loose, meaning that the driver can correct the condition without varying throttle (and he has confidence the car reacts in this condition linearly repeatedly) that you will get to the next corner quicker simple because the deceleration due to tire scrub of non directional wheels will be less at small yaw angles and the fact the driver hasn't tried to rotate the car with the throttle once entered. This of course does not go to the extremes of 'rallying' a car around a corner as the Doc Hudson turn right to go left method simply creates too much scrub from the rear tires going sideways.
    ------------------
    'Stay Hungry'
    JK 1964-1996 #25

  38. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca.
    Posts
    257
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TimW View Post
    So, I think this is more of a social engineering phenomena than an engineering phenomena, which is fundamentally a lot of what a race engineer is responsible to do. However, it doesn't seem to work universally with all drivers this way in my experience. Since a neutral car is so hard if ever to attain, you must choose which side of neutral you're willing to live with. While a car with understeer can (though not always) instill confidence, at a place like the speedway it just scrubs speed and slows you down. Sure if feels safer to be able turn the wheel more sometimes but with the wall coming at you quickly it may also not give a driver confidence to be more aggressive.

    Its been my experience that a car that is controllably loose, meaning that the driver can correct the condition without varying throttle (and he has confidence the car reacts in this condition linearly repeatedly) that you will get to the next corner quicker simple because the deceleration due to tire scrub of non directional wheels will be less at small yaw angles and the fact the driver hasn't tried to rotate the car with the throttle once entered. This of course does not go to the extremes of 'rallying' a car around a corner as the Doc Hudson turn right to go left method simply creates too much scrub from the rear tires going sideways.
    Actually I believe it is bit of both social and engineering phenomena to have a successfull racing program.

    An Oval is a different animal all together. When you start to involve banking especially. All dynamic movements are greatly enhanced and even small handling problems are big ones. The setups for an oval are so far removed from a road race car that a comparison isn't even fair.

    Its been my experience that a car that is controllably loose, meaning that the driver can correct the condition without varying throttle (and he has confidence the car reacts in this condition linearly repeatedly) that you will get to the next corner quicker simple because the deceleration due to tire scrub of non directional wheels will be less at small yaw angles and the fact the driver hasn't tried to rotate the car with the throttle once entered. This of course does not go to the extremes of 'rallying' a car around a corner as the Doc Hudson turn right to go left method simply creates too much scrub from the rear tires going sideways.
    Without argument, though only with respect to the car maintaining grip within it's slip angles and not above them. I guess that's what you mean by "Doc Hudson".
    It is unavoidable to have a car not achieve a larger slip angle on the rear tires over the front on a full throttle exit of the corner (a very well setup car). So having said that, adding any oversteer as result of "over driving" the exit is less desirable and slower than the car acquiring a slight understeer as the result. The U/S condition takes less time and thus less time loss to correct as a driver. And is more likely to be managed with more confidence and most importantly, can easily be attempted lap after lap, and keep the car on the track.

    (as a note, so we don't fall in a semantics discussion, In my view, oversteer/understeer are conditions outside of the tire's achievable slip angle on that end of the car).

    The biggest difference I have seen in driving styles is in the driver's knowledge of "what exactly" car rotation is and whether the driver has acquired a few techniques of doing so vs. those that don't/can't rotate correctly and need the car to do it for them. This technique is critical for dealing with understeer, in a manner that keeps the lap time loss from being too great.....IMHO
    George Main
    SpeedSense consulting

  39. #39
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.01.00
    Location
    streetsboro, ohio usa
    Posts
    906
    Liked: 100

    Default

    george,
    a question.
    i know that you were a pretty accomplished data guy working in FA with DSTP.
    but have you ever spent much seat time in a formula car?
    just wondering.


    mark d

  40. #40
    Senior Member Rennie Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.30.03
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    611
    Liked: 1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    No, you didn't imply any tricks, I did, as I have seen many who in the course of setting up a car attempt to "trick it" to do something. In some cases, as with an FE or Sports "rambo" where the springs, ARBs, and tires etc., are set Or Formula Mazda, where selections are also limited. Tricking the car has, once again become a "mode" of setup that some regularly go down this path in "most situations" rather than just a few times.
    There is no substitute for fundamentals.

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Agreed, though don't agree on the overdampening, except in very special cases,. IE- a Porsche cup car can respond very well to this, but has to do with engine location and the "little" chance of jacking the car down.
    Overshooting critical damping does not directly translate to overdamped, necessarily. Depends on smoothness of circuit, mostly. Also note that I did specifically call out "aero" cars - no way in hell would I take this approach with a FF, for instance. More like 0.3-0.5 critical damping, if that. This is one of those areas where a compromise is necessary between your budget and how fast you want to go - "optimum" damping rates are not the same for ride, roll, or pitch control. So you either need to find a good middle ground damping rate that gives overall good performance, or throw a lot more dampers and linkages on your car to achieve good balance in isolation.

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Interesting, don't you think? That when a driver debriefs, the steady state is the least likely to be brought up and the dynamic movements are the ones most complained of?
    Spend some quality time as a driver at the sharp end of the grid, and you'll understand why.

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    A great experiment ... [trimmed] ... An added effect of this kind of testing, is that the driver relates to each of the changes and what he has to change (driving wise) as all the dynamic movements are greatly increased and once they become smaller again are much easier realized in their individual effect on the car.
    This is how I learned to drive and setup cars. I learned to drive on dirt ovals in the midwest - 4 cylinder factory stock cars at first, straight out of the junkyard and stripped down of all non-essentials. I'd fill up the gas tank and pound around for hours on the local track. Stop, make a change - any change - and go back out for a half dozen more laps. Literally spent most of the summer doing this before my first season - damn near won my first race, too, despite starting from the "rookie pole", AKA back row. Since then I've gotten a bit more educated and put some formal engineering practice behind it, but the lessons still apply.

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    Though how do you turn an over steering car to begin with, into a car that is understeering or neutral.... without slowing down (much less throttle) at any point when at ten tenths throughout a corner?
    For this, I direct you to your own follow-on. Technique applies heavily in dealing with oversteer, and likely to a greater degree even than dealing with understeer:

    Quote Originally Posted by George Main View Post
    The biggest difference I have seen in driving styles is in the driver's knowledge of "what exactly" car rotation is and whether the driver has acquired a few techniques of doing so vs. those that don't/can't rotate correctly and need the car to do it for them. This technique is critical for dealing with understeer, in a manner that keeps the lap time loss from being too great.....IMHO

    Cheers,
    Rennie

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social