Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. #1
    Contributing Member bob darcey's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    709
    Liked: 162

    Default Noise Restrictions

    The Denver-area roadcourse, Second Creek Raceway, was recently granted one more year of operation before its final use permit expires. Although there are no new dB limits at trackside, we must meet the local 'nuisance ordinances' and all cars must have "mufflers". I'm curious as to what experience is out there re. mufflers for FF's, what other tracks require mufflers as a blanket rule, and what your recommendations are. Thanks in advance.
    There is a glitch in the continuum...

  2. #2
    Senior Member RoadHazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.04.04
    Location
    Napa, CA
    Posts
    478
    Liked: 2

    Default

    Laguna Seca has fairly Draconian noise ordinances now that people are building expensive houses nearby. (Never mind that the track was there first.) A Supertrapp does the job just fine, although I can't recall the exact model I/we/they use.

  3. #3
    Contributing Member Garey Guzman's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.09.02
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Posts
    2,848
    Liked: 858

    Default Other types?

    I was thinking about this too because I hope to run at Laguna Seca later this year. From my limited research, I know that other mufflers include:
    Burns Stainless Ultra-Light muffler (I don't know anyone who has one)
    Phase 3 (heavy but quiet acc'd to friend with 2L)
    Coast Fabrication (lighter but a little louder acc'd to friend with 2L)

    Anyone know anything about these? I accidently have two SuperTrapps but I'm hesitant to hang that big thing on the end of my pipe!
    Garey Guzman
    FF #4 (Former Cal Club member, current Atlanta Region member)
    https://redroadracing.com/ (includes Zink and Citation Registry)
    https://www.thekentlives.com/ (includes information on the FF Kent engine, chassis and history)

  4. #4
    Senior Member FC63F's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.11.02
    Location
    Plymouth, MI
    Posts
    470
    Liked: 1

    Default Muffler Rules

    Here in Michigan, Waterford Hills has rather stiff rules which require the use of a "commercially available" muffler and require a 75DB or less reading at the property fence line. We more than meet the rules using a supertrap diffuser with 20 plates and a flow through race bullet. A few years back a engineer came to the waterford and began to take readings and performed some interviews. What I learned was that the biggest noise level from a FC car was not related to the exhaust but to gears and other mechanical noises and that to improve the performance much from where we were would require shielding for the transaxle.

    Of note, group 1 which is CFC, FC, FA, FF, DSR, S-2000 and CSR etc with about 22-26 cars per week end is not the group with the sound problems.

    David Keep
    Crossle 63F-1

  5. #5
    Senior Member JHaydon's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.29.01
    Location
    Saukville, WI USA
    Posts
    1,094
    Liked: 3

    Default

    Gary Godula instructed me to use a SuperTrapp super-shorty muffler to keep my paddock neighbors happy while I warmed my engine. Coincidentally, my garage neighbors are a lot happier now, too. It's also perfect for warming your engine before "engine hours" at the track or in your home garage without waking the neighbors.

    Model ST-443-2011 is 10" long, quite light, sized to slip over a common FF tailpipe, and has an integral mounting bracket. It's designed for ATV's and other "powersports" vehicles.

    I haven't run it on the track because none of the tracks I've run have a blanket muffler rule (and I've squeaked under the radar every weekend), but this one seems like a good choice to me if you make a bracket to support it.

    (We have them in stock. )

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.23.04
    Location
    San Diego,Ca
    Posts
    1,269
    Liked: 492

    Default

    We have used the Coast Fab unit at Laguna and other tracks with great success.
    Roland Johnson
    San Diego, Ca

  7. #7
    Senior Member David Ferguson's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    Paso Robles, CA
    Posts
    1,165
    Liked: 286

    Default

    Bob's orginal question asked what other tracks require a muffler. Portland International Raceway is one course that does because it falls within the city limits. They still have 103dB limits, but all cars must have some type of muffler attached. Supertraps without plates are common.

    I've always liked the mufflers from Pete Webert at Quiet Horsepower. Call him for other smaller models that may be suitable for FF.

    http://www.beadform.com/quiet.html
    David Ferguson
    Veracity Racing Data
    Shift RPM App for iOS
    805-238-1699

  8. #8
    Contributing Member TimW's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.30.03
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    2,570
    Liked: 23

    Default

    I've crewed on a FF that ran Portland with a 'muffler' that essentially was a mass that slipped over the exhaust pipe on a DB1. Portland and many tracks that require mufflers are pretty loose on the definition of muffler if the car is under the noise limit, at least in my experience.

    Tim
    ------------------
    'Stay Hungry'
    JK 1964-1996 #25

  9. #9
    Contributing Member bob darcey's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    709
    Liked: 162

    Default

    Here's a link for Coast Fab--their ultralight units resemble the Burns Stainless.

    http://www.coastfab.com/ultralights.html

    Burns Stainless Ulta-lites:

    http://www.burnsstainless.com/Ultral...temuffler.html
    Last edited by bob darcey; 01.03.05 at 3:34 PM. Reason: add Burns URL
    There is a glitch in the continuum...

  10. #10
    Contributing Member bob darcey's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    709
    Liked: 162

    Default

    If I remember correctly, the loudest FF readings we've measured are about 98dB at 50ft from the edge of the track--this is at 5280' ASL. What kind of uncontrolled (no muffler) readings are common for FF's?? It would seem that FF's hardly need more than about a 3dB drop to satisfy most track requirements; any comments on that??
    There is a glitch in the continuum...

  11. #11
    Senior Member JHaydon's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.29.01
    Location
    Saukville, WI USA
    Posts
    1,094
    Liked: 3

    Default

    This past summer, my unmuffled car (which was louder than most FF's for reasons I won't go into here) was tripping the sound meter around 101db 50' from the track at full throttle. Almost all other cars were under 100, most around 98 (it was a fairly hot, very humid day).

    Sound control at that track (Blackhawk) is on driver's left just outside a right turn, so your exhaust is almost aimed directly at the sound meter. Their only requirement is to be below 103db.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.19.04
    Location
    Elizabeth, CO
    Posts
    276
    Liked: 74

    Default

    Hi Bob,
    As you may know, the Solo folks around Denver have voluntarily imposed a sound control program at the World Arena in Colorado Springs, to be "good neighbors." I'm the "chief" for this program and I happen to run a Formula Ford in CM. At the recommendation of a ff1600.com thread, I chose a Coast Fab muffler. I had them make me a custom muffler that's a couple inches longer than their standard item. The car typically measures about 90db, A weighted, slow response, 50' from the course. Our sound regs are on the rmsolo.org web site under the supplemental rules page, if you'd like to see more.

    Barry Ott

  13. #13
    Senior Member Dave SanF 50's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.24.03
    Location
    Alameda in SF Bay area (CA)
    Posts
    537
    Liked: 34

    Default quiet please!

    Guys
    Laguna Seca has multiple sound "windows". 8:30 -9:00 AM, under 90 DbA, 9:00 -10:30 under 101 DbA, 10:30-3:00 103 DbA, 3:00-5:00 under 101 DbA. The Ford groug typically runs in the 101 window. On my 1600, I use a 4 into 1 header and a SuperTrapp long (2.00 inlet, 24"-5.5 lbs) and no plates. The sound station is driver's right about half way between turns 5 and 6. This is a UPHILL section. A FF will normally be pulling 6K+ in third on the far right of the track. The meter is 50' from the edge of the track. I can easily make the sound level with the fiber glass in good shape. I always check the glass prior to the event. Laguna is just above sea level and normally has some real dense air (fog). You can be under the limit on a warm day and over on a foggy morning (Saturday afternoon and Sunday morning race).

    Sears sound level is 103 DbA all day and Thunderhill is 103 all day. I run a straight pipe for Thill and the SuperTrapp for Sears.

    Pacific Raceway in Seattle requires a "muffler" but I think the sound limit is 105. Straight pipe mets the level, but they want you to have a "muffler"

    Pheonix (PIR) I run a straight pipe. The level is 105, I believe.

    dave jalen

  14. #14
    Contributing Member Steve Demeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.01.01
    Location
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
    Posts
    6,373
    Liked: 923

    Default noise restrictions

    While we all have to be good citizens and respect the neighbors to the places where we are lucky enough to get to play, one question always lingered in my feeble mind:

    How can a bunch of club racers bother the neighbors at IRP at 105db? And how does the NHRA get the top fuelers muffled down to 105db

  15. #15
    Contributing Member SWMyers's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.11.01
    Location
    Saline, MI
    Posts
    354
    Liked: 19

    Default

    Last year I tested several different mufflers on my FC at a sound test track.

    Straight pipe: 100-102 dB
    Thrush glasspak: 95-97 dB
    Coast 2-1/4" SCCA: 94-98 dB
    SuperTrapp w/12 discs: 93 dB
    Dynomax Ultra Flo: 90-92 dB

    All readings were taken at 50 Ft.

    I also tested the backpressure on the SuperTrapp and the Dynomax. The SuperTrapp, although quiet and easy to mount had significantly more backpressure than the Dynomax. It flowed only 255 SCFM, which equates to a loss-free capacity of only 102 HP. The Ultra Flo has a oval muffler body, and is thus more difficult to mount on a formula car. But it flowed 580 SCFM which equates to a loss-free capacity of 263 HP.

    My conclusion is that if you want a significant sound reduction with the least restriction possible look for the largest flow through type muffler you can mount on your car. I ran the Ultra Flo at Waterford all last season and never had a problem.

  16. #16
    Classifieds Super License Charles Warner's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.01.01
    Location
    Memphis, TN, USA
    Posts
    3,930
    Liked: 416

    Default Sound Level Idiocy

    Steve,

    Good point. At Memphis, when the Test & Tune guys are running, you can hear them literally miles away. However, when we run we are limited to the Club Standard. What is more ridiculous is when "we" (the region) run Legends with our SCCA groups the Legends cars do NOT have to maintain the SCCA standards, but we do. Go figure!

    Someone has got a bug up their you-know-what about this and has convinced the powers-that-be that it's a "good neighbor" thingie to establish such limits. Bollocks I says.
    Charlie Warner
    fatto gatto racing

    'Cause there's bugger-all down here on earth!

  17. #17
    Contributing Member Frank C's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.30.02
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    1,247
    Liked: 25

    Default Noise Symposium at Le Mans

    I think all of us interested in noise should attend this Symposium. Do you think we could get SCCA to pay to send us?
    Managing Uncertainties in Noise Measurement and Prediction
    - Frank C

  18. #18
    Contributing Member bob darcey's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    709
    Liked: 162

    Default

    Frank, I think you're the right guy to attend. I'll sign your expense report!

    Thanks for all the information people have posted, lots of good leads to follow.
    There is a glitch in the continuum...

  19. #19
    Member spinmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.11.05
    Location
    Chalfont, PA
    Posts
    10
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bob darcey
    The Denver-area roadcourse, Second Creek Raceway, was recently granted one more year of operation before its final use permit expires. Although there are no new dB limits at trackside, we must meet the local 'nuisance ordinances' and all cars must have "mufflers". I'm curious as to what experience is out there re. mufflers for FF's, what other tracks require mufflers as a blanket rule, and what your recommendations are. Thanks in advance.
    Contact the Formula Race Car Club of America (FRCCA) http://www.frcca.com/index.php
    They started having to run mufflers at Bridgehampton years ago and also ran at Waterford.
    Someone should be able to help you out without tremendous loss of power.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    01.20.05
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    47
    Liked: 0

    Default

    ya know, the whole "super-trap in teh paddock" is a nice idea, on the track.... I can't STAND noise regs... Laguna Seca's is, as referenced above, particularly draconian.

    most of the tracks out here are in teh middle of nowhere.... loud is OK!
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

  21. #21
    Senior Member FC63F's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.11.02
    Location
    Plymouth, MI
    Posts
    470
    Liked: 1

    Default Waterford Hills Expereince

    Waterford Hills has been running for at least 20 years with strong noise restrictions and the requirement for a "commercially available muffler on all cars. We have to hit a 75db limit at the edge of the property which sounds draconian but in fact amounts to 20 plates on a supertrap for my Crossle 63F CFC car. I have to admit that I have tried using no plates to see how close we are to the measurement and depending upon the wind, humidity etc, I can make the limit. I use the 20 plate system and the loss of power is negligable. I think the losses might be more noticable at other tracks. Waterford is a 1.5 mile 10 turn track which rewards speed through the corner and not HP. It might be more noticable at Mid Ohio or some other track where you are at full throttle more.

    In the end, the issue is more about emotion than anything else. The problem amounts to a minor inconvenience compared to havings 18 races per year (6 w/e x 3) 45 minutes from my house.

    David Keep
    WHRRI #63
    Crossle 63F-1

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.21.02
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,434
    Liked: 68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FC63F
    In the end, the issue is more about emotion than anything else.
    Absolutely true. On my old Crossle 32, when I got a new exhaust system so I could add the 'muffler' for Portland, my average dB reading was actually higher than it had been with the previous 'straight-pipe' exhaust. The quiet one was illegal, the loud one was legal.

    It never ceases to amaze me how lawmakers can create stupid legislation, i.e., it's OK if it's louder, as long as it has a 'muffler'.

    Now I'm driving a F500 - loud as he11 in the cockpit, but no problems with the A-weighted sound meter.....go figure.

    Marshall Mauney
    Steel Cities Region
    Marshall Mauney

    Milwaukee Region

  23. #23
    Contributing Member bob darcey's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    709
    Liked: 162

    Default

    Yup, there oughta be a law against city councilmen messing with science. My business is air pollution control systems, and I once sat in a city council meeting about a wet scrubber system we were installing. They asked about the liquid effluent from the system, and I replied that the pH would be around 7 to 7.3. The biggest idiot at the table started pounding his fist on the table and yelling "We want that pH to be absolutely ZERO!!!" I told him that we'd look into that.
    There is a glitch in the continuum...

  24. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    08.08.01
    Location
    Duluth, MN
    Posts
    50
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Bob, that's the best thing I've read (or heard) all day! For a second there, I thought you might be from Duluth, but I guess that's not the case...

    Adam

  25. #25
    Contributing Member Frank C's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.30.02
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    1,247
    Liked: 25

    Default Le Mans Noise Uncertainty Conference

    The final program for the conference at Le Mans has been released along with meeting details. It looks pretty good! The e-mail announcement follows:

    MANAGING UNCERTAINTIES IN NOISE MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION

    This International-INCE symposium organised by INCE/Europe and CIDB will take place in Le Mans (France) 27-29 June 2005.

    5 Main Topics will explore uncertainties through 125 papers and discussion sessions:
    Instrumentation
    Environment/Transport/Traffic
    Building and Construction Products
    Machines, Vehicles and Sources
    Occupational Noise

    Participants will have the opportunity to visit the Le Mans 24-hours racing circuit and automobile museum as well as its medieval town and cathedral.

    Le Mans is 55 minutes from Paris by TGV.

    TITLES OF PAPERS and INFORMATION FOR REGISTRATION now available on:
    www.uncertainty-noise.org

    - Frank C

  26. #26
    Contributing Member Robert J. Alder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.06.03
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    839
    Liked: 301

    Default

    So, you'll go as a delegate, Bob?

  27. #27
    Contributing Member bob darcey's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.06.02
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    709
    Liked: 162

    Default

    As I told Frank earlier today, I would, you know. except I already have a lobotomy scheduled for that week. Anyway, SG would never grant permission!
    There is a glitch in the continuum...

  28. #28
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    05.29.02
    Location
    Great Falls, VA
    Posts
    2,245
    Liked: 8

    Default Noise

    As a steward, I have closely watched the noise readings of many cars through many races. In the past 8 years, I have only seen one FF exceed the 103 db limit as measured and described in the SCCA GCR, and frankly, I believe it was a cheater engine. This has been my experience at Summit Point, through all kinds of weather conditions. I have seen 2-liter motors occasionally over the limit, but not the 1600.

    Three weeks ago at our National, we had 7 or 8 cars that lost session times (or were DQ'd during the race) for excessive noise. No FFs were even close, but we did have an FA as well as FP, GT and a couple others that were in violation. Currently we seem to have more problems with smaller displacement, higher-revving engines than the older, more known engines.

    Larry Oliver
    Larry Oliver

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social