Just watched a 3-episode show on NASCAR at Riverside in the Motor Trend 500 years. Very interesting, I loved the part about Gurney.
I got to wondering, if sprawl had not swallowed up Riverside, would the track still be around, and if so how would it have changed? In it's 30-odd year existence 19 drivers died there, from world-class racers to club drivers. If it were still there, I suppose there would be several chicanes like the Inner Loop at Watkins Glen, plus more level runoff areas, tire walls and SAFER barriers. When you look at wrecks like Foyt's, and the unyielding boilerplate against earthworks, it's no surprise how dangerous it was.
Here's a question - would you race at Riverside today if it was the same as it was in 1970? I know it's a dumb question, like assuming The Glen would be as it was in '70, but it's kind of a level of risk evaluation. Like if you'd run on a board track today at 180 MPH.
Is there a track you consider dangerous today?