Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 46
  1. #1
    Contributing Member EricP's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.22.09
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    978
    Liked: 482

    Default Aeroscreen for Indycars...

    Interesting. Aesthetically, I'm not crazy about it but if it works, I am for it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/auto/drivers...-ready-to-race

  2. The following 2 users liked this post:


  3. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    I wonder how much the odds of heavy-ish debris ending up in the grandstands will increase?

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,292
    Liked: 1886

    Default

    I'm wondering more about massively reduced visibility towards the end of a long race when driving into the sun with a dirty windscreen.

  5. The following 4 users liked this post:


  6. #4
    Classifieds Super License Raceworks's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.03.07
    Location
    Cumming, GA
    Posts
    505
    Liked: 215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EricP View Post
    Interesting. Aesthetically, I'm not crazy about it but if it works, I am for it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/auto/drivers...-ready-to-race
    I like it better than the halo, although I'm not sure how necessary the plexiglass really is.
    Sam Lockwood
    Raceworks, Inc
    www.lockraceworks.com

  7. #5
    Contributing Member EricP's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.22.09
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    978
    Liked: 482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R. Pare View Post
    I'm wondering more about massively reduced visibility towards the end of a long race when driving into the sun with a dirty windscreen.
    It appears there is a tear-off on the screen but yeah, that could be an issue. Helmet visors have issues too... although probably not as bad. Will be interesting to see...

  8. #6
    Classifieds Super License Raceworks's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.03.07
    Location
    Cumming, GA
    Posts
    505
    Liked: 215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R. Pare View Post
    I'm wondering more about massively reduced visibility towards the end of a long race when driving into the sun with a dirty windscreen.
    I'm betting they use tear-offs similar to what they've used in endurance sports car racing for the last 15 years.
    Sam Lockwood
    Raceworks, Inc
    www.lockraceworks.com

  9. #7
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    I wonder what happens when it rains? I can see that at speed it may not be an issue but under slower safety car speeds maybe?
    Personally I prefer the Halo aesthetically.

  10. The following 2 users liked this post:


  11. #8
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    09.06.08
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,048
    Liked: 290

    Default

    I'll take MotoGP where you can still see what the drive/rider is doing.

    Brian

  12. The following 4 users liked this post:


  13. #9
    Contributing Member Steve Demeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.01.01
    Location
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
    Posts
    6,376
    Liked: 923

    Default

    It is butt ugly. Maybe when the frame is painted to harmonize with the car it will not look as bad. I hope that they are using something better than plexiglass.

    And I second the visibility issues it could introduce.

    The NHRA canopy is much nicer looking, but not sure how applicable it would be to Indy Car.

  14. The following members LIKED this post:


  15. #10
    Contributing Member DaveW's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.25.01
    Location
    Bath, OH
    Posts
    6,194
    Liked: 3323

    Default

    It's polycarbonate - Lexan.
    Dave Weitzenhof

  16. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.22.10
    Location
    Schellsburg, PA
    Posts
    311
    Liked: 115

    Default Wind screen

    ..















    Formula Vee had this covered years ago....


  17. #12
    Senior Member mmi16's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.05.07
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    989
    Liked: 307

    Default

    Rain on a road course is one thing - but the mud and slop that get kicked upon a following car is another.

    At present you can clear your visor with your hand and fingers - with the RBT Screen - NFW!

  18. The following members LIKED this post:


  19. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,292
    Liked: 1886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Demeter View Post
    I hope that they are using something better than plexiglass.
    It is actually built to F15 canopy specs, if i recall correctly.

  20. #14
    Contributing Member cjsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.25.08
    Location
    Columbia SC
    Posts
    116
    Liked: 95

    Default

    You won't need helmet tear offs any more. Would be nice if they could develop a driver activated tear off roll that could be rotated or advanced as needed. As mentioned, rain could be a problem. Maybe 2 separate windshield wipers and some windshield washer fluid that would spray on your windshield and the next 2 cars behind you....

  21. #15
    Senior Member tige00's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.12.10
    Location
    arizona
    Posts
    156
    Liked: 49

    Default

    Looks horrible, are we dirt tracking now. And what kind of drag does that produce, nothing like having a see through wall sitting in front and on top of the car, rediculous.

  22. #16
    Contributing Member Kazis31's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.13.09
    Location
    Circuito Do Sol Portugal
    Posts
    1,453
    Liked: 384

    Default

    i agree hideous halo with class in it.

    Good by old school racing.......
    Maris Kazia ,CEO
    EuroKraft Inc Racing
    Circuito do Sol
    2014 Radical SR 3 RSX, 2x Tatuus FA 01
    BMW HP2 .BMW K1200 R.Porsche 996 Carerra 4s

  23. The following 2 users liked this post:


  24. #17
    Senior Member t walgamuth's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.20.10
    Location
    Lafayette INdiana
    Posts
    1,289
    Liked: 295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grapefarmeral View Post
    .. This is the best!















    Formula Vee had this covered years ago....
    this is the best.

  25. The following members LIKED this post:


  26. #18
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,777
    Liked: 3787

    Default

    I read some of the above comments and i think these old timers must have also been against:

    Roll bars
    Belts
    Helmets
    HANS devices
    Safety Barriers
    On board fire systems
    Nomex
    Fuel Cells
    etc. etc. etc.

    Maybe they want everyone driving around in cotton shirts and baseball caps at 235 MPH, to show they are "real men".

    I've seen a kid in formula car hit a deer.
    And watch a Swift tailpipe bouncing along the track ahead of you coming out of T5 at Atlanta.
    I've had a car on top of me with a few inches between its frame and the front of my helmet... these things are needed.

    Get upside down sliding along on a guard rail sometime...

  27. The following 8 users liked this post:


  28. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    02.22.10
    Location
    Schellsburg, PA
    Posts
    311
    Liked: 115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cjsmith View Post
    You won't need helmet tear offs any more. Would be nice if they could develop a driver activated tear off roll that could be rotated or advanced as needed. As mentioned, rain could be a problem. Maybe 2 separate windshield wipers and some windshield washer fluid that would spray on your windshield and the next 2 cars behind you....

    Dirt trackers have had a motorized "tear off" for years

  29. #20
    Member GrahamLoughead35's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.18.17
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    84
    Liked: 32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grapefarmeral View Post
    ..















    Formula Vee had this covered years ago....

    As cool as this Formula Vee looked it is illegal to do now in the FV class
    Graham Loughead FV #35
    Formula Vee Hall of Fame Founder

  30. #21
    Contributing Member EricP's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.22.09
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    978
    Liked: 482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GrahamLoughead35 View Post
    As cool as this Formula Vee looked it is illegal to do now in the FV class

    But those aluminum folding chairs are still okay, right? Classic...

  31. The following 4 users liked this post:


  32. #22
    Senior Member t walgamuth's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.20.10
    Location
    Lafayette INdiana
    Posts
    1,289
    Liked: 295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    I wonder how much the odds of heavy-ish debris ending up in the grandstands will increase?
    I'm betting none or near none.

  33. #23
    Senior Member pacratt's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.11.11
    Location
    Burr Ridge, Illinois
    Posts
    608
    Liked: 301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grapefarmeral View Post
    ..















    Formula Vee had this covered years ago....
    It was also thrown aside when drivers realized how little - or NO - visibility they had when it rained and/or got mud slinged on it.
    I guess this means IndyCars racing road courses in the wet will become a thing of the past (?)
    My vote..Halo - YES...Windscreen - NO
    Glenn

  34. #24
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    09.09.02
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    307
    Liked: 18

    Default Caracal D

    Noble withdrew from the Runoffs race because he couldn't see. they slotted the front of the windscreen to help defrost the windscreen.

    FV

  35. #25
    Senior Member chrisw52's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.31.12
    Location
    Santa Cruz, ca
    Posts
    954
    Liked: 183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Frog View Post
    I read some of the above comments and i think these old timers must have also been against:

    Roll bars
    Belts
    Helmets
    HANS devices
    Safety Barriers
    On board fire systems
    Nomex
    Fuel Cells
    etc. etc. etc.

    Maybe they want everyone driving around in cotton shirts and baseball caps at 235 MPH, to show they are "real men".

    I've seen a kid in formula car hit a deer.
    And watch a Swift tailpipe bouncing along the track ahead of you coming out of T5 at Atlanta.
    I've had a car on top of me with a few inches between its frame and the front of my helmet... these things are needed.

    Get upside down sliding along on a guard rail sometime...
    fine.. then be done with it, put roofs, windshields and fenders on the car and kill off professional open wheel racing

    meanwhile, the rest of the club racers will continue to race these "manly" classic race cars risking life and limb because they love racing...

  36. The following 2 users liked this post:


  37. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.01.01
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,310
    Liked: 353

    Default

    Racing safety improvements are very much like application software development. As an issue is addressed, other things become apparent and need to be addressed.

    Cars now crash without catching fire and if they do the driver has been sufficiently restrained and is wearing fire retardant materials giving him/her a chance to get out. Things aren't penetrating the driver's compartment nearly as frequently.

    We're getting down to the remaining open space, which is where things seem to be the focus of concern.

    Undoubtedly, should the halo/windscreen prove successful in reducing cockpit intrusion further, some other area will become the focus of attention due to its prevalence in injuries.

    According to those who object so strongly to these advancements, we should just stop trying to improve things.

    Bollocks!
    Peter Olivola
    (polivola@gmail.com)

  38. The following 4 users liked this post:


  39. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
    I'm betting none or near none.
    Hopefully you are correct. However, that piece of debris/spring/wheel/whatever that hits that windscreen is going to be deflected upwards and outwards. How far and how high, we'll see.

  40. #28
    Contributing Member GT1Vette's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.07.01
    Location
    St Marys, GA
    Posts
    1,136
    Liked: 202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    Hopefully you are correct. However, that piece of debris/spring/wheel/whatever that hits that windscreen is going to be deflected upwards and outwards. How far and how high, we'll see.
    Really?

    Let's ask the spectator who was sitting in the top row of the stands at the 1987 Indy 500 and got killed by a loose wheel that Roberto Guererro punted between turns 3 & 4 if HE thinks debris gets launched by cars with no windscreen. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1987/05...1352548827200/

    But carry on regardless...
    Butch Kummer
    2006, 2007, 2010 SARRC GTA Champion

  41. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GT1Vette View Post
    Really?

    Let's ask the spectator who was sitting in the top row of the stands at the 1987 Indy 500 and got killed by a loose wheel that Roberto Guererro punted between turns 3 & 4 if HE thinks debris gets launched by cars with no windscreen. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1987/05...1352548827200/

    But carry on regardless...
    Where did I say debris don't get launched by cars without a windscreen?

    In fact, I could argue that it's implicit in my previous statement that it does happen and the odds of future occurrences has now been increased to some degree.

  42. #30
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,543
    Liked: 1494

    Default

    i was at that race and a good friend of mine was a "yellow shirt" behind the north chute grandstand. Wheel landed about 50 feet from him after killing the spectator (who was looking over the back of the grandstand and didn't see it coming).

    I agree with peter and Froggie on this one. Once we stopped beating guys to death we burned them to death. Then we figured out that the majority of deaths remaining were hangman's fractures. we
    re getting down to cutting the handle of the toothbrush now. Deaths are extremely low, and almost all involve a solid blow to the head.

    They are ugly now. give them a couple years of refinement and a chassis designed for the and they'll be fine.

    Indy had huge wind screens in the 70s. They just figured out how to build a car that didn't need them anymore. Now they do. pretty simple.

  43. The following 5 users liked this post:


  44. #31
    Senior Member t walgamuth's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.20.10
    Location
    Lafayette INdiana
    Posts
    1,289
    Liked: 295

    Default

    From the limited view of the Penske windshield it looked pretty nice. A full fighter style canopy would look extremely cool too but the driver would not be visible.

  45. #32
    Contributing Member greg pizzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.06.02
    Location
    san jose ca
    Posts
    1,297
    Liked: 48

    Default

    upside down and on fire I would not want to be in that car or even just upside down in soft dirt or gravel trap NO thanks ! besides being FUGLY
    Last edited by greg pizzo; 10.05.19 at 1:48 PM.
    friend us on FaceBook search "velocity haus"
    like on facebook search "velocity haus Engineering"
    Velocityhaus.com
    velocityhaus@gmail.com
    @Velocityhaus2 instagram

  46. The following 2 users liked this post:


  47. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    06.02.02
    Location
    St Charles, Mo
    Posts
    546
    Liked: 159

    Default Yes FV had one....but

    Yes FV had one......and most were eventually removed......very poor visibility.
    Quote Originally Posted by grapefarmeral View Post
    ..















    Formula Vee had this covered years ago....

  48. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,292
    Liked: 1886

    Default

    I'm sorry, but that is butt ugly.


  49. The following members LIKED this post:


  50. #35
    Contributing Member EricP's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.22.09
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    978
    Liked: 482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R. Pare View Post
    I'm sorry, but that is butt ugly.

    Ugh, yeah, agreed. I wasn't crazy about the F1 at first but I've gotten used to it and it is WAY better than this. I'm all for the safety improvement but this is hard to look at...

  51. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,292
    Liked: 1886

    Default

    On top of that, one can only wonder about what it is doing to the airflow to the rear wing...

  52. #37
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,777
    Liked: 3787

    Default

    it matches the whole car.

  53. The following 3 users liked this post:


  54. #38
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.26.13
    Location
    Woodstock, NY
    Posts
    222
    Liked: 81

    Default

    Oh! And I thought that was a Shriner's Parade Car!
    Seriously! In my opinion you can see components from several completely different cars here.
    Don't mind me I don't even follow Indy cars ,what do I know.

  55. #39
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    01.28.14
    Location
    Mississauga, Ontario
    Posts
    722
    Liked: 902

    Default

    Why don't we just skip to the inevitable conclusion????

    Pull the drivers out of the cars permanently. Let them drive by remote, in the comfort of their motorcoaches, via their iPhones.

    I'll show myself out now

    BT

  56. The following members LIKED this post:


  57. #40
    Contributing Member swiftdrivr's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.13.07
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,342
    Liked: 679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R. Pare View Post
    I'm sorry, but that is butt ugly.

    The original design was clear, curved, aerodynamically efficient, and while not pretty, wasn't really distracting. This thing looks like it belongs on a tractor, or maybe a tank. Mount a 50 caliber on the rim, no reinforcement necessary... I am surprised that they couldn't come up with something less aesthetically jarring. But then, maybe they are trying to get Caterpillar as a title sponsor?
    Looks better than Senna in a Williams though.
    Jim
    Swift DB-1
    Talent usually ends up in front, but fun goes from the front of the grid all the way to the back.

  58. The following members LIKED this post:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social