Results 1 to 30 of 30
  1. #1
    Contributing Member RussMcB's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.19.02
    Location
    Palm Coast, FL
    Posts
    6,693
    Liked: 562

    Default FB: 2018 Runoffs

    Any interesting news or stories from practice and qualifying?

    Hope the folks there are having as good a time as possible. Looking forward to the race (via web).
    Racer Russ
    Palm Coast, FL

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    12.20.04
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    644
    Liked: 80

    Default

    Anybody? Bueller?


    Quote Originally Posted by RussMcB View Post
    Any interesting news or stories from practice and qualifying?

    Hope the folks there are having as good a time as possible. Looking forward to the race (via web).

  3. #3
    Contributing Member RussMcB's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.19.02
    Location
    Palm Coast, FL
    Posts
    6,693
    Liked: 562

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JakeL View Post
    Anybody? Bueller?
    I'm sure they're all very busy.

    Looking at the grid, wow, JR is still fast (an understatement), and Gary looks further down the grid that I'd (and he'd) expect to be.

    They are the last race of the weekend, so hopefully that gives them all time to have their cars in great shape for the race.
    Racer Russ
    Palm Coast, FL

  4. #4
    Member Tony Opheim's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.14.03
    Location
    Garfield, WA
    Posts
    74
    Liked: 10

    Default

    I'll chime in since we're in the same run group and these cars have a special place in my heart.

    First, let me just say JR is not fully human - he is either part cyborg or a mutant (I'm going with a mutant). His car control is simply unreal - I don't know how he goes so stupidly fast and yet be so smooth at the same time. Plus he seems to be able to pass in places others would not think to and yet they never appear "unsafe" or "high risk". Not quite sure how to say it but he makes his car very visible in your mirrors. A mutant I tell you...

    Randy Cook is the best of the rest - he knows this track really well. Taught me a thing or two!

    Gary Hickman is having a heck of a time. He was going well right up until a motor change before Q1. He struggled with shifting issues for all three qualify sessions and after changing pretty much all of the Geartronics components he resorted to putting his old motor back in. I was leaving the track yesterday as he did a hardship lap so don't know if he got it fixed.

    If Gary gets things sorted out I think he could easily challenge Randy otherwise he, Rod Rice, and Kevin Roggenbuck will be fighting for third.
    Tony Opheim
    '02 Swift 014.a (1600cc Toyota, 1732cc Toyota, and 2.0L MZR Mazda )

  5. The following 2 users liked this post:


  6. #5
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.02.01
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    1,051
    Liked: 212

    Default Rice penalized in tech; Hickman is your winner!

    Rod Rice receives a three-spot penalty for a tech violation. Gary Hickman is announced as the winner.

    Congrats Gary!

  7. #6
    Contributing Member Lotus7's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.10.05
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    2,367
    Liked: 884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Jeffords View Post
    Rod Rice receives a three-spot penalty for a tech violation. Gary Hickman is announced as the winner.

    Congrats Gary!
    I know only what you wrote here, but curious how a "tech violation" isn't binary ... you're legal or you're disqualified, no?
    can you elaborate?
    thx

  8. #7
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.02.01
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    1,051
    Liked: 212

    Default Link...

    Quote Originally Posted by Lotus7 View Post
    can you elaborate?
    thx
    I don’t know any of the details or heard any rumors. Here is the source of my comment:
    https://www.scca.com/articles/201060...for-maiden-win

  9. The following members LIKED this post:


  10. #8
    Senior Member jaltaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.29.10
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    284
    Liked: 66

    Default

    It's for passing under yellow, I believe.

    Congrats Gary - you guys worked your tails off for it!

  11. #9
    Contributing Member problemchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.22.02
    Location
    Ransomville, NY
    Posts
    5,743
    Liked: 4368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lotus7 View Post
    I know only what you wrote here, but curious how a "tech violation" isn't binary ... you're legal or you're disqualified, no?
    can you elaborate?
    thx
    Considering there were only 4 cars running, and 2 cars on the lead lap, one of which was deemed illegal, the difference between position penalty or DSQ seems like a moot point.
    Greg Rice, RICERACEPREP.com
    2016 F2000 Champion, Follow RiceRacePrep on Instagram.
    2020 & 2022 F1600 Champion, 2020 SCCA FF Champion, 2021 SCCA FC Champion,
    Retirement Sale NOW, Everything must go!

  12. #10
    Contributing Member John Nesbitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.04.03
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,836
    Liked: 1090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Jeffords View Post
    I don’t know any of the details or heard any rumors. Here is the source of my comment:
    https://www.scca.com/articles/201060...for-maiden-win

    PUY. In my experience, there is only one instance at the Runoffs where a post-race compliance violation did not result in a DQ, and that was PlungeGate in SM in 2014.

    Finals are posted here: https://www.scca.com/pages/2018-runoffs-results
    John Nesbitt
    ex-Swift DB-1

  13. #11
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.02.01
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    1,051
    Liked: 212

    Default quote

    Here's the exact quote from the link above, which I interpreted as a violation of something found during post race tech inspection:

    "However, Rice received a three-spot penalty for a tech violation after the race."

  14. #12
    Contributing Member John Nesbitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.04.03
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,836
    Liked: 1090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Jeffords View Post
    Here's the exact quote from the link above, which I interpreted as a violation of something found during post race tech inspection:

    "However, Rice received a three-spot penalty for a tech violation after the race."

    Agreed. "tech violation" surely sounds like a compliance issue.

    Whoever wrote that press release should have known better.
    John Nesbitt
    ex-Swift DB-1

  15. #13
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Nesbitt View Post
    Agreed. "tech violation" surely sounds like a compliance issue.

    Whoever wrote that press release should have known better.
    i am amazed that therecseems to be no info on this rechnical violation???
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  16. #14
    Senior Member bill gillespie's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.23.04
    Location
    atlanta
    Posts
    864
    Liked: 101

    Default

    With respect , Jay.....I’m amazed at several tech rulings/ non-rulings during this premiere SCCA event
    cheers,
    Bill

  17. #15
    Contributing Member John Nesbitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.04.03
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,836
    Liked: 1090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    i am amazed that therecseems to be no info on this rechnical violation???

    Because, according to the final results, there was no tech violation. The penalty was for a pass under yellow. The write-up misstated the infraction.
    John Nesbitt
    ex-Swift DB-1

  18. #16
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Nesbitt View Post
    Because, according to the final results, there was no tech violation. The penalty was for a pass under yellow. The write-up misstated the infraction.
    thanks John
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  19. #17
    Contributing Member Thomas Copeland's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.19.00
    Location
    Az
    Posts
    1,500
    Liked: 166

    Default

    Gary sent me a text reply last night. Said Randy Cook protested Rice for passing under yellow.

    I also think I heard Gary mention during the podium ceremony this was his last race in SCCA. I certainly hope not. I texted him last night asking if true but he hasn't responded back yet.
    Firman F1000

  20. #18
    Senior Member ghickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.20.07
    Location
    Alpine California
    Posts
    1,192
    Liked: 273

    Default

    Sitting here at the airport waiting for my flight. I just got word that I did officially win. Rod Rice passed under a standing yellow at the entry to T8. I believe it may have been Roggenbuck that layed down oil and it sent out the emergency crew. I guess Rod did not see the yellow but he passed I believe 3 or 4 cars in the process which allowed him to make up some ground on me. Rod and I were nose to to tail the last lap or so.
    Randy Cook and I had a great battle going then I was able to get around Randy then I think he may have had a mechanical problem.
    From my vantage point JRO was not pulling much of a gap on Randy and me which surprised me.
    The last few laps I really got held up by the Atlantic cars especially under heavy braking.

    thanks to all that have sent out congrats to me, it was a difficult week to say the least
    Gary Hickman
    Edge Engineering Inc
    FB #76

  21. The following 5 users liked this post:


  22. #19
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    So cool Gary, congrats!
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  23. #20
    Senior Member ghickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.20.07
    Location
    Alpine California
    Posts
    1,192
    Liked: 273

    Default

    Thanks Jay, your enthusiasm for the F1000 class has always been an inspiration to me personally.
    Gary Hickman
    Edge Engineering Inc
    FB #76

  24. The following 3 users liked this post:


  25. #21
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ghickman View Post
    Thanks Jay, your enthusiasm for the F1000 class has always been an inspiration to me personally.
    thanks a ton Gary. Both Brian and I love FB AND WE ARE THRILLED FOR YOU AND YOUR VERY HARD EARNED NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP!
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  26. The following 2 users liked this post:


  27. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    01.16.03
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    64
    Liked: 21

    Default Yes!!!

    Congratulations Gary, Tony, and Dustin. - You guys built one hell of an FB car: technically elegant, innovative, and beautifully constructed. - I sincerely admire your perseverance, acumen on track, and ultimately your results in bringing it to a deserving national championship: Cheers to you!!!

    Scully

  28. The following 4 users liked this post:


  29. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Congratulations Gary! I saw that tail FA was giving both y'all fits. I was hoping you purposely let Rice by (coming to take the white flag, don't remember exactly) just so he'd get balked and you could pounce.

    It seems to me, that all too often in the mixed group racing, that egos get in the way. Tail end of "faster" class cars just can't find it in themselves to let leaders of "slower" class cars come through unimpeded.

  30. The following members LIKED this post:


  31. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.07.05
    Location
    TORONTO
    Posts
    296
    Liked: 80

    Post

    Congratulations Gary, Tony and Dustin, I wish I could have been there...Jeremy

  32. The following 2 users liked this post:


  33. #25
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.02.01
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    1,051
    Liked: 212

    Default I may be mistaken....

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    Tail end of "faster" class cars just can't find it in themselves to let leaders of "slower" class cars come through unimpeded.
    I may be mistaken, but I believe the two slower FA's were battling for third position, and thus their disinterest in what was immediately behind them!

  34. The following members LIKED this post:


  35. #26
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ghickman View Post
    Thanks Jay, your enthusiasm for the F1000 class has always been an inspiration to me personally.
    thanks a ton Gary. We only had an FB for 3 seasons and even though we won the runoffs in 2011 we were over our heads wrt to the $$$ required to race at the front.. That said it was our favorite class ever! A great and tough class and super fast too!

    Btw: in your opinion what is the best engine?
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  36. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Jeffords View Post
    I may be mistaken, but I believe the two slower FA's were battling for third position, and thus their disinterest in what was immediately behind them!
    I understand your point, but I have an issue with the "sportsmanship" involved in mixed-class race groups when you have leaders in one class coming up to non-leaders in another class.

    If the trailing FA was racing for 7th, should they have let the FB's through? What about 17th? What if they were battling for 3rd but a lap down? Got to draw the line somewhere, right?

    The 3rd and 4th place FA's were 3 to 4 seconds apart for much of the last couple laps (I may be mistaken as well, but that's my recollection). When you have two cars, in another class, driving 10/10ths, crawling up your ass, and the guy you're trying to chase down is a football field ahead, you don't have to give up much real estate to let those other guys through. Hell, tuck in behind them. Maybe learn a thing or two. When they catch the guy you were battling maybe you'll be right there and can get him too. If they don't catch the other guy, you wouldn't have either.

  37. The following 4 users liked this post:


  38. #28
    Senior Member ghickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.20.07
    Location
    Alpine California
    Posts
    1,192
    Liked: 273

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    thanks a ton Gary. We only had an FB for 3 seasons and even though we won the runoffs in 2011 we were over our heads wrt to the $$$ required to race at the front.. That said it was our favorite class ever! A great and tough class and super fast too!

    Btw: in your opinion what is the best engine?
    Jay
    I still like the 07/08 Suzuki a lot. I ran all season long on the same engine. We ran all the test days at Sonoma with the same engine. We switched to our fresh engine for qualifying the yanked it out after Q3 because it acted like it had bent shift forks. So the tired engine went back in for the race. We've got our wet sump pan dialed in and we make 80 psi oil pressure all the time. Less complicated and lighter weight.

    JRO and Roggenbuck were both running back dated 2015 GEN5 KAWI's. Roggenbuck blew up 2 of them.

    I really like the idea that I can run my car an honest 25 lbs lighter than the post 2011 engine cars.

    What I would like to see for the class is a 45MM restrictor for all engines. The 07/08 Suzuki is 45MM so no restrictor needed. Then allow us to run aftermarket ECU's so no back dating would be needed.
    Gary Hickman
    Edge Engineering Inc
    FB #76

  39. The following members LIKED this post:


  40. #29
    Fallen Friend Northwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.06.07
    Location
    Marquette, Mi.
    Posts
    906
    Liked: 43

    Default

    Congrats Gary,

    It's great to see all your hard work pay off.

  41. #30
    Contributing Member mario_zgb's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.11.05
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    84
    Liked: 6

    Default

    Congrats Gary... i think you deserved it long time ago... your car and race craft were always positioning you between top contenders... this time you did it really hard way

    Anyone knows what happened to JR? Without info it would be easy to say car was left at 3 lap setup even he turned low 1:31 "only" considering his qualy times.

    It was hard to see during the race but was there something complicated going on around his rear diffuser?

    Would also like to know, since we never raced there, what are the biggest challenges of that track? Blind corners, braking after the crest while rear end stepping out, elevation changes affecting oil pressures...?

    Thanks

  42. The following members LIKED this post:


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social