Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 121 to 150 of 150
  1. #121
    Senior Member HazelNut's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.07.02
    Location
    locust valley, ny USA
    Posts
    1,954
    Liked: 142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsmithwc04 View Post
    Hey! Discusing medical records without patient consent is unlawful. I know a good lawyer I should call but I could probably only afford an ambulance chaser. In that case I may as well call Brendan first. Lol
    I'm most definitely not an attorney, you're thinking of my illustrious and formerly rotund team mate.
    Awww, come on guys, it's so simple. Maybe you need a refresher course. Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays.

  2. #122
    Contributing Member Steve Demeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.01.01
    Location
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
    Posts
    6,373
    Liked: 923

    Default

    Amen Steve.

    It takes tons of effort and hard work to get to the sharp end, no matter what class you are in.

    The Ztec did not hurt FC one bit, IMHO.

    If the Pinto guys had the bucks and the time there would be some of them there.

    But the talent and money always seem to gravitate towards the latest and greatest no matter what the racing is.

    So can't we just all get along.

    Personally I would love to go to the IMS Runoffs, but simply do not have the bucks or the motivation to put up with all the associated aggravation.

    So I will continue to run "regionals"

    And not complain about Ztec.

  3. The following members LIKED this post:


  4. #123
    Member
    Join Date
    04.04.13
    Location
    Victoria BC, Canada
    Posts
    26
    Liked: 18

    Default

    I'll answer Greg's question for 50 posts ago. I'm "planning" on going to the runoffs.

    Now I just need to decide, zetec or pinto. Not sure which one is better. Anyone have any advice? I work a day job and have only ready 1% of this thread

    I still have a faster lap at Mission in my pinto, but I'm only a 10th off with the zetec on much older tires. Love that zetec bottom end though.

  5. #124
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MotorCade View Post
    Thanks, understandable, lotta bickering. I've had my position misrepresented enough that I'm even going "what the heck, I'll just take the team over to SVRA and forget this mess." It feels like the SCCA has a clique and they don't like diversity of thought. I doubt that's actually true, but the dogpile is a bit frustrating.
    Do it. You'll be miles of smiles ahead.

    There's a reason those other clubs are taking market share from SCCA. I believe it's already beyond the tipping point.

    As Frog put so succinctly "the juice ins't worth the squeeze"

    Either go pro series or go to one of the vintage organizations who get it.

  6. The following members LIKED this post:


  7. #125
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,777
    Liked: 3787

    Default

    I've been pondering this perceived dilemma with the Captain this evening.

    The solution:

    Our new zetec map will produce 152 hp during it's first hour of run time. Then each hour it runs it will drop one hp. When the zetec owner can't live with the drop any longer he/she can send the ECU back to the engine builder with a check for $4,000 and he'll get back a 152 hp ECU with the timer reset to zero.

    Then... at last... we will have pinto - zetec parity!




  8. The following 7 users liked this post:


  9. #126
    Senior Member ccoffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.14.11
    Location
    Spokane Valley, WA
    Posts
    587
    Liked: 120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RSS View Post
    I don't know I read somewhere that 100% of FE drivers have VD and that's a risk I am not willing to take!
    Quote Originally Posted by dsmithwc04 View Post
    Hey! Discusing medical records without patient consent is unlawful. I know a good lawyer I should call but I could probably only afford an ambulance chaser. In that case I may as well call Brendan first. Lol
    Quote Originally Posted by HazelNut View Post
    I'm most definitely not an attorney, you're thinking of my illustrious and formerly rotund team mate.
    Chill out... he's just talking about his dad plus he's from Canada (different privacy and health care systems, both far too complicated to be understood south of the border). He had VD for almost a whole year... got it from some kid named Z** B****. Passed it along to M****** L***** at the end of the year. Was glad to hear he got the French Treatment and hasnt felt any tire rubber burning sensations on his chassis since.

  10. The following members LIKED this post:


  11. #127
    Senior Member ccoffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.14.11
    Location
    Spokane Valley, WA
    Posts
    587
    Liked: 120

    Default

    Also going to keep track of people who actually answer John's initial question here in post #127

    FC Indy Runoffs 2017

    Going:
    Greg Coffin (pinto)
    Dane Babkirk (pinto)
    Gavin Aitken (pinto)
    Cade Wilson car #1 (pinto)
    Cade Wilson car #2 (pinto)

    Assuming Going cause he has an automatic entry and he started the thread:
    John Larue (zetec)

    Maybe:
    Chuck Moran (zetec)
    Tim Minor (zetec)
    Beau Borders (zetec)
    Brent Gilkes (zetec)
    Mitch Egner (zetec)


    Nope:
    Hazelnut (zetec)
    Last edited by ccoffin; 04.05.17 at 11:47 AM.

  12. The following 2 users liked this post:


  13. #128
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    10.11.06
    Location
    Howell, MI
    Posts
    568
    Liked: 218

    Default

    Going, two cars, have said a couple times...pintos.
    www.wrenchaholics.com

    Rental, Coaching, and Data Analysis for Great Lakes Region

  14. #129
    Contributing Member problemchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.22.02
    Location
    Ransomville, NY
    Posts
    5,738
    Liked: 4362

    Default

    Eight FCs entered for VIR ST, which is biggest field in the East for a while. Some are "practicing" for FRP event two weeks later.

    I would expect, from that group, that Moran, Minor, Borders, and Gilkes have Runoff plans.
    Greg Rice, RICERACEPREP.com
    F1600 Arrive-N-Drive for FRP and SCCA, FC SCCA also. Including Runoffs
    2020 & 2022 F1600 Champion, 2020 SCCA FF Champion, 2021 SCCA FC Champion,
    2016 F2000 Champion, Follow RiceRacePrep on Instagram.

  15. #130
    Classifieds Super License racerdad2's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.20.11
    Location
    Mn
    Posts
    2,756
    Liked: 202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Frog View Post
    I've been pondering this perceived dilemma with the Captain this evening.

    The solution:

    Our new zetec map will produce 152 hp during it's first hour of run time. Then each hour it runs it will drop one hp. When the zetec owner can't live with the drop any longer he/she can send the ECU back to the engine builder with a check for $4,000 and he'll get back a 152 hp ECU with the timer reset to zero.

    Then... at last... we will have pinto - zetec parity!



    That truly sums it up and put a smile on my face this morning ! Our pintos simply wear out too fast and your long rod - piston combo solution was and still is a very good solution.

    I'm always impressed by the vast knowledge, expertise and insights of the many veterans on this site.

    A Heartfelt Thanks to All of You !
    "An analog man living in a digital world"

  16. #131
    Contributing Member problemchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.22.02
    Location
    Ransomville, NY
    Posts
    5,738
    Liked: 4362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Frog View Post
    I've been pondering this perceived dilemma with the Captain this evening.

    The solution:

    Our new zetec map will produce 152 hp during it's first hour of run time. Then each hour it runs it will drop one hp. When the zetec owner can't live with the drop any longer he/she can send the ECU back to the engine builder with a check for $4,000 and he'll get back a 152 hp ECU with the timer reset to zero.

    Then... at last... we will have pinto - zetec parity!



    Yes much like Jonathon's clever post from August 2013 regarding the FF engine discussion.

    The Honda drivers have to "buy" a restrictor from the organizer and they are kept in 3 boxes.
    Box 1 has restrictors sized randomly from 29 to 30mm. It costs $3500 to choose from this box.
    Box 2 has sizes between 29.5 to 30 mm. $8000
    Box 3 has sizes between 30.1 30.5 mm. $12,000
    There is a secret 4 th box of 30.6mm restrictors which cost $15000 and you must have made at least 3 purchases from Box 3 in the past 2 years.

    You can purchase a new restrictor once a season, or after 15 hours of run time. The parity will not be found on the dyno, but by seeing the Honda drivers having the same uncertainty of end HP, and $ spent for HP, over many seasons as the Kent drivers.


    There is a reason that FC/F2000 people were looking to strengthen the class two decades ago by finding a reliable consistent alternate engine. They were not villains out to destroy the class, but people trying to keep it alive and well.
    Greg Rice, RICERACEPREP.com
    F1600 Arrive-N-Drive for FRP and SCCA, FC SCCA also. Including Runoffs
    2020 & 2022 F1600 Champion, 2020 SCCA FF Champion, 2021 SCCA FC Champion,
    2016 F2000 Champion, Follow RiceRacePrep on Instagram.

  17. The following members LIKED this post:


  18. #132
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    10.11.06
    Location
    Howell, MI
    Posts
    568
    Liked: 218

    Default

    I also got a chuckle out of it. I recognize that this all comes across as very serious sounding on the forums, but it's not all. I'm laughing at much of it on this end, too.

    I also still like the long rod solution. My thinking is that my letter will focus less on hp gain, and more on reliability improvement and narrowing the range of variation of the pinto motors. If we could start to get reliable numbers within a repeatable band. Then we can talk more about where those fall out, and what to do from there.

    As for the 'super pinto' worries - Why not simply disallow backdating? If your car came with a zetec (01-12) then it may not go back to the pinto. If your car has an upgraded pinto, it may not upgrade the bodywork to 01-12 (a very expensive option anyhow). Then the 'pinto won't win anyway, the cars are too old' argument only serves to validate that it's ok to improve the pinto, and no one will attempt to build a super pinto in a modern chassis.

    But... still trying hard to get beyond this one solitary issue... what else can we do to get more pintos out? I've still not heard anyone else champion any ideas, or offer incentives, or ???

    What I DON'T want is this to turn into Formula Clique, where those with zetecs ridicule the rest, and the pinto peasants stay away. That is shortsighted for all of us, and for the club. Let's offer real advice instead of snarkiness. Thanks.

    Cade
    www.wrenchaholics.com

    Rental, Coaching, and Data Analysis for Great Lakes Region

  19. #133
    Contributing Member Lotus7's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.10.05
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    2,219
    Liked: 804

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MotorCade View Post

    I've still not heard anyone else champion any ideas, or offer incentives, or ???

    Cade
    Well, I kinda sorta did ... I think a lot of guys could come out and have great fun dicing mid-pack with a bunch of like cars (Pintos or zetecs) if they could just come to terms with the idea that they realistically aren't NatChamp material regardless of the car.
    See my earlier comments about SM and SRF.

    Sure, there's always that next Senna, if only he had the money for a better ride, but this thread is about generalities and overall field depth, right?

  20. The following members LIKED this post:


  21. #134
    Contributing Member DaveW's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.25.01
    Location
    Bath, OH
    Posts
    6,191
    Liked: 3323

    Default The Pinto cylinder-head related to consistent HP

    Quote Originally Posted by MotorCade View Post
    ...I also still like the long rod solution. My thinking is that my letter will focus less on hp gain, and more on reliability improvement and narrowing the range of variation of the pinto motors. If we could start to get reliable numbers within a repeatable band. Then we can talk more about where those fall out, and what to do from there...Cade
    Just my non-engine-builder's opinion, but...

    "Narrowing the range of variation of the Pinto motors" will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, unless everyone starts over with a "spec" head and gets it correctly ported.

    The reason for this statement is that many heads had core shift, ports too large to start with, were over-ported, etc.

    A really good head starts with small, properly-located ports that can be massaged properly, remaining "small" while paying close attention to the "short-turn-radius," etc. The exact configuration of the ports is what controls response, torque, and HP. Keeping the fuel in suspension while not restricting flow is the key.

    A poorly configured porting job results in low, or at least inconsistent, torque and HP.

    And once the head is ported badly, there is no way to go back and make it good without violating the rules, since no material can be added.
    Dave Weitzenhof

  22. The following 5 users liked this post:


  23. #135
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    10.11.06
    Location
    Howell, MI
    Posts
    568
    Liked: 218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lotus7 View Post
    Well, I kinda sorta did ... I think a lot of guys could come out and have great fun dicing mid-pack with a bunch of like cars (Pintos or zetecs) if they could just come to terms with the idea that they realistically aren't NatChamp material regardless of the car.
    See my earlier comments about SM and SRF.

    Sure, there's always that next Senna, if only he had the money for a better ride, but this thread is about generalities and overall field depth, right?
    We're in agreement that is the best goal we can shoot for this year. The challenge (as I see it) is convincing more pintos that it's worth the extra money for less run time against what is likely to be a smaller grid than many are experiencing in their regionals. If they're being asked to fill the grid, but not to be competitive, why not just do an open track day?

    That's why I'm suggesting a "contingency trophy" to be awarded to fastest pinto. Not to disparage the zetec guys...but to give the guys who've been asked to fill the grid something extra that they can race for as well.

    I think we need to be careful with saying all pinto owners are slow. I certainly will back of the pack, but I know plenty of exceptional racers in many classes who could be front runners in the right car.
    www.wrenchaholics.com

    Rental, Coaching, and Data Analysis for Great Lakes Region

  24. #136
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    10.11.06
    Location
    Howell, MI
    Posts
    568
    Liked: 218

    Default

    This is really good info, thanks.

    Thinking of the "tongue in cheek" comment about why don't we just go to FE, why don't we simply open it up to any 2L motor and watch the money fly? <---joking of course, but... what if there was a way to allow more and get manufacturers back involved? Hmmm. I know that's way out there...

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveW View Post
    Just my non-engine-builder's opinion, but...

    "Narrowing the range of variation of the Pinto motors" will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, unless everyone starts over with a "spec" head and gets it correctly ported.

    The reason for this statement is that many heads had core shift, ports too large to start with, were over-ported, etc.

    A really good head starts with small, properly-located ports that can be massaged properly, remaining "small" while paying close attention to the "short-turn-radius," etc. The exact configuration of the ports is what controls response, torque, and HP. Keeping the fuel in suspension while not restricting flow is the key.

    A poorly configured porting job results in low, or at least inconsistent, torque and HP.

    And once the head is ported badly, there is no way to go back and make it good without violating the rules, since no material can be added.
    www.wrenchaholics.com

    Rental, Coaching, and Data Analysis for Great Lakes Region

  25. #137
    Contributing Member Lotus7's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.10.05
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    2,219
    Liked: 804

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MotorCade View Post
    I think we need to be careful with saying all pinto owners are slow. I certainly will back of the pack, but I know plenty of exceptional racers in many classes who could be front runners in the right car.
    Apologies, wasn't meant to come across that way.
    All along I've merely been advocating "any car is more fun to drive on track than look at in the garage".
    Surely racing "whatcha brung", within your means, is better than nothing

  26. The following members LIKED this post:


  27. #138
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.03.00
    Location
    Chatham Center, New York
    Posts
    2,189
    Liked: 863

    Default A small gauntlet

    So how about this?

    FRP to provided a year end trophy and some prize money for the top pinto powered F2000.

    Criteria: there must be a season total of 5 pinto cars that enter at least one race and the winner has to have entered 3 races, or something like that. Maybe I can figure out a slightly lower entry fee?

    How many takers would I have?
    ----------
    In memory of Joe Stimola and Glenn Phillips

  28. The following 8 users liked this post:


  29. #139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,291
    Liked: 1881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Wright View Post
    So how about this?

    FRP to provided a year end trophy and some prize money for the top pinto powered F2000.

    Criteria: there must be a season total of 5 pinto cars that enter at least one race and the winner has to have entered 3 races, or something like that. Maybe I can figure out a slightly lower entry fee?

    How many takers would I have?

    How 'bout something like the old A and B series, with the B's being older cars and/or Pintos?

  30. The following members LIKED this post:


  31. #140
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    05.08.10
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    743
    Liked: 296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Wright View Post
    So how about this?

    FRP to provided a year end trophy and some prize money for the top pinto powered F2000.

    Criteria: there must be a season total of 5 pinto cars that enter at least one race and the winner has to have entered 3 races, or something like that. Maybe I can figure out a slightly lower entry fee?

    How many takers would I have?
    Make that happen Bob and I'll scratch something together either this year or next.
    Chris Livengood, enjoying underpriced ferrous whizzy bits that I hacked out in my tool shed since 1999.

  32. The following members LIKED this post:


  33. #141
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    I'm surprised that an alternate class or trophies will bring out the Pinto cars but after thinking about it I can see the merit in this. There is no harm in offering both Zetec & pintos to run together & scoring them separate from one another. You would directly be comparing apples to apples so why not just make it a sub class. If that's what it takes to bring a few more cars out then go for it.
    Last edited by Steve Bamford; 04.05.17 at 2:01 PM.
    Steve Bamford

  34. The following 5 users liked this post:


  35. #142
    Contributing Member marshall9's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.15.02
    Location
    Glendale, Arizona
    Posts
    2,212
    Liked: 502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Bamford View Post
    I'm surprised that an alternate class or trophies will bring out the Pinto cars but after thinking about it I can see the merit in this. There is no harm in offering both Zetec & pintos to run together & scoring them separate from one another. You would directly be comparing apples to apples so why not just make it a sub class. If that's what it takes to bring a few more cars out then go for it.
    Makes sense to me.

  36. #143
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    05.11.07
    Location
    Southeast MI
    Posts
    735
    Liked: 254

    Default

    There are several currently running regional series for FCs that are having success and others looking to do the same. The club guys want to race and are making it happen on their own but the SCCA and a few small local organizations are the only options thru which to race. If you provide them a place to play, and it drives the entry costs down (thinking along the lines of SCCA $), and those racers are welcomed with open arms I see no reason it couldn't work well. I have friends and acquaintances that used to run the F2000 B series back in the 90s and 00s and said they had a blast.

  37. The following 4 users liked this post:


  38. #144
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,291
    Liked: 1881

    Default

    The old baytos-run series used the A/B format to great success when the B cars were allowed points/monies for both within the B class, as well as for their overall position. The rules got changed to B cars being classified only in the B class finishes, and if my memory is correct, the B entries started to drop shortly thereafter.

  39. #145
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    05.08.10
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    743
    Liked: 296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Bamford View Post
    I'm surprised that an alternate class or trophies will bring out the Pinto cars but after thinking about it I can see the merit in this. There is no harm in offering both Zetec & pintos to run together & scoring them separate from one another. You would directly be comparing apples to apples so why not just make it a sub class. If that's what it takes to bring a few more cars out then go for it.
    You know me pretty well Steve. I have every intention of competing against the Zetecs, even with a Pinto, or outdated chassis. That said, it's silly to try to do so over a 14 race series. 6 is way more reasonable. Provide a carrot for the short term guys, it will almost certainly be wortwhile for both the competition and the series.
    Chris Livengood, enjoying underpriced ferrous whizzy bits that I hacked out in my tool shed since 1999.

  40. The following 3 users liked this post:


  41. #146
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Livengood View Post
    You know me pretty well Steve. I have every intention of competing against the Zetecs, even with a Pinto, or outdated chassis. That said, it's silly to try to do so over a 14 race series. 6 is way more reasonable. Provide a carrot for the short term guys, it will almost certainly be wortwhile for both the competition and the series.
    Makes sense to me. In F2000 the podium could be a Zetec podium & a Pinto podium & no real need for a Masters podium at this point in time. It was often a Masters full sweep the last year or 2 out of 3 were masters for the last few years.

    No doubt Chris you'd be at the pointy end of the grid regardless of engine.
    Steve Bamford

  42. The following members LIKED this post:


  43. #147
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    10.11.06
    Location
    Howell, MI
    Posts
    568
    Liked: 218

    Default

    I plan to have a photographer with my team for a couple of the days at Indy. Would any of ya'll be interested in arranging all of our cars (zetec & pinto both) for a group shot?

    Maybe one of the qualifying days, in the 'magic hour' of the evening after our session?
    www.wrenchaholics.com

    Rental, Coaching, and Data Analysis for Great Lakes Region

  44. The following members LIKED this post:


  45. #148
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    03.23.05
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    106
    Liked: 58

    Default Indy

    My team is putting together an Indy effort. We are running a new to us 01 VD zetec at pocono and mid Ohio back to back than something later. My only experience is F5, but we are up for the challenge. The price seems right on some of these cars. It would be nice to see the numbers higher. Seven are at pocono so it's a start. Looking forward to the new class.

    Jeremy Swank

  46. #149
    Contributing Member Lotus7's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.10.05
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    2,219
    Liked: 804

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Bamford View Post
    I'm surprised that an alternate class or trophies will bring out the Pinto cars but after thinking about it I can see the merit in this. There is no harm in offering both Zetec & pintos to run together & scoring them separate from one another. You would directly be comparing apples to apples so why not just make it a sub class. If that's what it takes to bring a few more cars out then go for it.
    Yup, agreed wholeheartedly, seems to make sense, right?

    Yet, look at FA. With the same goal of increasing entries, FRP set up FA as two classes to try to entice the Ralts, DB4's etc to come and play, and .... nada.
    Then said "hey, got a ProFMazda? you are welcome as well now" ... same nada.

    Is it lack of competitiveness or lack of money that keeps them in the garage? No idea, I'm crew, not owner/driver, but the hundreds of open wheel cars languishing in garages are not getting any more valuable, just dusty.
    Last edited by Lotus7; 05.26.17 at 11:08 AM.

  47. #150
    DJM Dennis McCarthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.30.02
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    743
    Liked: 120

    Default

    John,

    Doug and I both plan on going to Indy.

  48. The following members LIKED this post:


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social