Illustrating that just because car (a) reached a similar top speed to car (b) at the end of a straight despite a slower exit speed doesn't mean a whole lot if the straight is long enough. In other words, I would need more info before I called someone a cheater.
Fair enough. I am also inclined to believe something is off, but not so strongly that I would call them a cheater failing to be able to prove so.Originally Posted by Bam Bam
Absolutely. Even when they have the ability, people look at the probability and take their chances. Heck, when was the last time an engine was torn down at any vintage race or SCCA event outside of the run-offs or sprints?