Home
ApexSpeed Portal HomeApexSpeed Reader GalleryApexSpeed.blogsApexSpeed AdvertisingForums













Old October 19th, 2013, 10:11 PM   #1
Bruce Hazelton
Member
 
Bruce Hazelton's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 27th, 2009
Location: Burlington, Wi
Posts: 54
Default Track records vs. Runoffs records

Is there an official reason why Runoffs race records are segregated from track records? It would seem to me that a Runoffs race record would carry more weight as a pure record as for the most part run groups are not mixed. At a National or Major a record could be set within mixed groups by a car of the slower class having a record setting run from a tow off a car in the faster class. With the high level of post race scrutiny at the Runoffs and the level of competition, to me Runoffs records are harder to attain.
Bruce Hazelton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 19th, 2013, 10:45 PM   #2
Jnovak
Contributing Member
 
Jnovak's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 8th, 2007
Location: Dearborn
Posts: 1,580
Default

I agree. I never did understand this.
__________________
Thanks ... Jay Novak
313-445-4047
jnovak@novaracecars.com
46 years as an SCCA member
with a special thanks to every SCCA worker
Jnovak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 19th, 2013, 11:20 PM   #3
efoxfield
Member
 
Join Date: July 24th, 2007
Location: Geneva IL.
Posts: 36
Default

I also agree. A record is a record.
Ed
efoxfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 20th, 2013, 1:11 AM   #4
David Ferguson
Senior Member
 
David Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 6th, 2002
Location: Paso Robles, CA
Posts: 654
Default

Records seem to be kept by the timing & scoring organization. So tracks that have multiple regions using them, often have multiple records recorded by those regions. I'm not surprised that the Runoffs are separate from the other region records.

I first noticed it at Mid-Ohio around 2000 or 2001.

That always seemed like a great opportunity for the SCCA National office to record/administrate.
__________________
David Ferguson
Veracity Racing Data
Shift RPM App for iOS
805-238-1699
David Ferguson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 20th, 2013, 1:36 PM   #5
Bruce Hazelton
Member
 
Bruce Hazelton's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 27th, 2009
Location: Burlington, Wi
Posts: 54
Default track records

Does it really matter what region the record was set in as long as each organization, (SCCA, Midwest Council, etc.) due to different class rules, has their own records. At Road America, Midwest Council records are theirs and they do not recognize SCCA records for example.
Bruce Hazelton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 20th, 2013, 1:57 PM   #6
Peter Olivola
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1st, 2001
Location: Erie, CO
Posts: 482
Default

I think there's one very important difference that justifies separate records for the Runoffs vs. othjer SCCA Club Racing events: Tech.
__________________
Peter Olivola
(polivola@gmail.com)
Peter Olivola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2013, 12:25 PM   #7
Bruce Hazelton
Member
 
Bruce Hazelton's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 27th, 2009
Location: Burlington, Wi
Posts: 54
Default Track Records

Peter could you clarify why tech at the Runoffs versus National events is a good reason to keep them separate. With better tech at the Runoffs why wouldn't the usually better lap times have to take a back seat to the slower published National records? As an example my son Reid just reset the FF record to 2:21.037 while the recognized SCCA track record is 2:22.056. He went quicker, passed min. weight, passed fuel check and spent about 4 hours in tech compared to getting weighed, giving a fuel sample and waiting in tech for 30 minutes at a National.
Bruce Hazelton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2013, 2:12 PM   #8
KevinFirlein
Senior Member
 
KevinFirlein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20th, 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,279
Default

As stated I think the reason is the track records most are familiar with are recored by the regions and there is no region of record at the Runoffs. Run a different sanction with the same rules and beat the existing record and that wont count either.

I got burned at my home track at Summit Point the very 1st time I ever ran a 'fender car' Ran an ITA car and everyone thought it would be a joke. I was running the 1st endure with the car owner as the car driver. The Enduro was Sunday and on Saturday there was normal length races for those who just wanted to race but not punish the car in the Enduro. Our region runs a successful local regional series called MARRS. I broke the ITA record on Saturday and then crushed it during the endure. ( so much for it being a joke). Didn't count even though it was the same track , region, and class, with tech, but it wasn't a MARRS race so the official record stood. I didn't care I knew I was faster. I just wondered how much quicker I could have gone if he hadn't installed rock hard brake pads and changed to a harder , slower tire for durability.

apparently I used the brakes harder then they wanted to be used as the burst into flames when I pulled into the pits
__________________
Kevin Firlein Autosport,Inc.
Runoffs - 1 gold, 3 silver, 3 bronze, 3x drivers of the year
2004 Star Mazda East Coast series champions
8 Divisional championships 6 Regional championships
KevinFirlein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2013, 4:10 PM   #9
Terry Hanushek
Contributing Member
 
Terry Hanushek's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 6th, 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 204
Default

Kevin

Quote:
I broke the ITA record on Saturday and then crushed it during the endure. ( so much for it being a joke). Didn't count even though it was the same track , region, and class, with tech, but it wasn't a MARRS race so the official record stood.
No real plot - many (most?) enduros have noted in their supps that lap records are not recognized. This restriction is imposed because of the multiple drivers and the inability to inspect for compliance during the race (weight, restrictors, adjustments, etc.) e.g. an SM could throw down a killer lap without a restrictor early in the race then 'find' the restrictor at a later pit stop. What ... you drove a tin top????

Terry
Terry Hanushek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2013, 4:21 PM   #10
steve everard
Senior Member
 
steve everard's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 25th, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 144
Default Tires

Is it because for runoffs you can use new tires for the race and not at regional/majors ???
steve everard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2013, 4:54 PM   #11
KevinFirlein
Senior Member
 
KevinFirlein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20th, 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,279
Default

Like I said Terry I wasn't upset but I also broke the record on the Saturday non enduro race but since it wasn't a MARRS it didn't count. When I broke the overall track record the 1st time in 96 they werent going to count it since it was on a Saturday non points race till me dad asked why not ? MARRS weekend, tech, all laps for all cars timed, whats the problem ? 'She' finally agreed and counted it. The supps for the next year stated Saturday records would not count. In the end I got a very nice special year end award from the region for breaking a lap record that the chief of timing and scoring at 1st didn't want to count

I would never have expected for a lap in an endure to count but there was no reason the Saturday lap couldn't have counted but I surely wasn't gonna lose sleep over it. I was just having fun driving something completely different for a change.
__________________
Kevin Firlein Autosport,Inc.
Runoffs - 1 gold, 3 silver, 3 bronze, 3x drivers of the year
2004 Star Mazda East Coast series champions
8 Divisional championships 6 Regional championships
KevinFirlein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2013, 7:12 PM   #12
Peter Olivola
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1st, 2001
Location: Erie, CO
Posts: 482
Default

It's less of an issue in a class like FF, but the current Fastrack contains a Runoffs appeal decision that is an indication of why the differences between the Runoffs and Majors create opportunities for mischief. The chances that a Majors tech would catch that situation are decidedly less than the Runoffs and that's a fairly minor example of the kinds of things that may be going on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Hazelton View Post
Peter could you clarify why tech at the Runoffs versus National events is a good reason to keep them separate. With better tech at the Runoffs why wouldn't the usually better lap times have to take a back seat to the slower published National records? As an example my son Reid just reset the FF record to 2:21.037 while the recognized SCCA track record is 2:22.056. He went quicker, passed min. weight, passed fuel check and spent about 4 hours in tech compared to getting weighed, giving a fuel sample and waiting in tech for 30 minutes at a National.
__________________
Peter Olivola
(polivola@gmail.com)
Peter Olivola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2013, 1:55 PM   #13
Bruce Hazelton
Member
 
Bruce Hazelton's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 27th, 2009
Location: Burlington, Wi
Posts: 54
Default Track records

So Peter as you agree that "mischief' would be more possible at a Majors, then a Runoffs record could be considered more real and should be considered as the track record of the track the Runoffs were held at. I can't see why there would be a problem for someone in Cendiv to update their published records to reflect the Runoffs faster times from the last 5 years. Heck I'd volunteer to do it if they'd let me. Otherwise does anyone know how to pursue this further to get this changed?
Bruce Hazelton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2013, 5:37 PM   #14
Peter Olivola
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1st, 2001
Location: Erie, CO
Posts: 482
Default

That's probably a conversation with the Area Director, Executive Steward and/or Divisional Points Keeper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Hazelton View Post
So Peter as you agree that "mischief' would be more possible at a Majors, then a Runoffs record could be considered more real and should be considered as the track record of the track the Runoffs were held at. I can't see why there would be a problem for someone in Cendiv to update their published records to reflect the Runoffs faster times from the last 5 years. Heck I'd volunteer to do it if they'd let me. Otherwise does anyone know how to pursue this further to get this changed?
__________________
Peter Olivola
(polivola@gmail.com)
Peter Olivola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2013, 9:14 PM   #15
RussMcB
Contributing Member
 
RussMcB's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 19th, 2002
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Default

I wonder why SCCA does not have a standardized way (and place) to keep track records.
RussMcB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 8:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©ApexSpeed 2000-2013