I'm getting closer to finishing the car and taking it off the stands since February, not that long ago really, but racing season has started and I'm fumbling left and right learning how to assemble a car that has so many ways "looking at it" and many different obstacles when improving things a bit. I may now thank many of the members of ApexSpeed primarily because there is so much to learn here. I'm glad that the SR group has a chance now to archive information, debacles and such and such.
So I'm in the process of deciding one of two things. The first, is strake angle of attack under the no-strakes diffuser on this Novak converted RF98, the diffuser is nice looking, fits well, but has no strakes. There is a bubble under the center of the diffuser to do, this bubble is a bit over a 1sq ft of the center o the diffuser, it also helps to accomodate for the chassis conversion, I not very sure of that assumption either. Ok, the two pictures show the angles of attack I had in mind, straight perpendicular or at a slight angle which may create a funnel look to it. I will let common knowledge guide me in how to install the strakes and the bracket wings to do some work.
The set of pictures is of the extra wing/artifact that we want to use as a support for the diffusser via our huge sail panels/endplates. My question is, if there enough clean air to make this little artifact give something of a little "kick", would you want the trailing end of the artifact to be leading the gurney on the diffuser, even or behind it, when looking at it from the side. The angle of attack of the artifact can be adjusted but I wouldnt know the difference, looks cool.
thanks for comments and criticism Marchand Juan R