Home
ApexSpeed Portal HomeApexSpeed Reader GalleryApexSpeed.blogsApexSpeed AdvertisingForums





Old April 12th, 2012, 6:28 PM   #1
R. Pare
Forum Advertiser
 
Join Date: August 18th, 2002
Location: Indy, IN
Posts: 3,413
Default Long Beach

Intrigue already!

ALL Chevrolet engines are to be replaced before the weekend starts, meaning that all Chevy drivers will be automatically penalized 10 spots on the grid. Seems a Chevy blew up in the last test, and Chevy has decided to play it safe for the race weekend.

Going to be an interesting first few laps with all the slower guys starting up front!

What I haven't heard, though, is how this will affect the Fast 6 qualifying.
R. Pare is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2012, 6:47 PM   #2
10rmotor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8th, 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 290
Default

Since this affects their qualifying position (once thats determined) the penalty should be assessed after qual is done?
10rmotor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2012, 10:16 PM   #3
FVRacer21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 8th, 2005
Location: Torrington CT
Posts: 232
Default

Why does nobody see this - if all the manufacturers pull their engines and everyone gets a penalty - then no one gets a penalty....
FVRacer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2012, 10:39 PM   #4
Offcamber1
Senior Member
 
Offcamber1's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 9th, 2010
Location: West Union, IL USA
Posts: 272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FVRacer21 View Post
Why does nobody see this - if all the manufacturers pull their engines and everyone gets a penalty - then no one gets a penalty....
That would first assume that all the other manufacturers had enough donks to go around.
Offcamber1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2012, 12:21 PM   #5
Daryl DeArman
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 4th, 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FVRacer21 View Post
Why does nobody see this - if all the manufacturers pull their engines and everyone gets a penalty - then no one gets a penalty....
Other manufacturers may not need to Why would you give your competition 10 spots back by replacing something that doesn't need replacing?
__________________
Daryl DeArman
Daryl DeArman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2012, 10:52 AM   #6
FVRacer21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 8th, 2005
Location: Torrington CT
Posts: 232
Default

I understand honda is changing all of thier turbos- wonder if this will kick in the penalty.......
FVRacer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2012, 11:26 AM   #7
Michael Edick
Senior Member
 
Michael Edick's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 3rd, 2003
Location: Pine Grove, CA
Posts: 170
Default

if the teams incur any more penalties, everyone will have to start the race a half hour away in downtown Torrance!
__________________
www.mteengineering.com
1976 LeGrand Mk21 FF, chassis #4
1980 Ralt RT5 FSV, chassis #196
Michael Edick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2012, 7:36 PM   #8
Ty_Handke_83
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 15th, 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 362
Default

Didn't seem to have much of an effect on the overall result...

I wonder how Honda feels now
__________________
Ty Handke

Handke Motorsport Technologies
Cars In Development: HMST-F01a(FF), HMST-B01c(FB)
Ty_Handke_83 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2012, 8:20 PM   #9
glenn cooper
All Knowing One
 
glenn cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18th, 2006
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 2,347
Default I dunno about all that...

but I'll tell ya THIS:
If I ever win the ride along in the back of the 2 seater Indcar, I'm bringing my own helmet!
Evidently they only have a XXXL for passenger use.
I've not seen a helmet that loose since what's his name scared the bejeezus out of his old lady at Daytona in the DP car...
glenn cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2012, 9:12 PM   #10
John Merriman
Contributing Member
 
John Merriman's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 4th, 2002
Location: North Haven, CT
Posts: 701
Default Marco does it again

So.....Marco crashes yet again !! He's got a hell of a long way to go to live up to the Andretti name!!
__________________
www.theKENTlives.com
John Merriman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2012, 9:34 PM   #11
Doug Carter
Benevolent Dictator
 
Doug Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 24th, 2000
Location: North Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 4,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Merriman View Post
So.....Marco crashes yet again !! He's got a hell of a long way to go to live up to the Andretti name!!
I saw a T-shirt once that said, "All of your failed relationships have one thing in common... YOU."

It's funny how every crash he has is ALWAYS someone else's fault and never him making bad or stupid decisions. With Danica Craptastic now gone from the IndyCar series, I can more easily point my distaste and ire at silver spoon Marco. He's a Lucky Sperm Club Member and a complete hack. I love to watch him crash himself out of races on a weekly basis.
__________________

twitter: @dougcarter4
Doug Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2012, 11:35 PM   #12
Michael Edick
Senior Member
 
Michael Edick's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 3rd, 2003
Location: Pine Grove, CA
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Carter View Post
I saw a T-shirt once that said, "All of your failed relationships have one thing in common... YOU."

It's funny how every crash he has is ALWAYS someone else's fault and never him making bad or stupid decisions. With Danica Craptastic now gone from the IndyCar series, I can more easily point my distaste and ire at silver spoon Marco. He's a Lucky Sperm Club Member and a complete hack. I love to watch him crash himself out of races on a weekly basis.
Ah, c'mon Doug...stop beating around the bush and tell us how you REALLY feel...
__________________
www.mteengineering.com
1976 LeGrand Mk21 FF, chassis #4
1980 Ralt RT5 FSV, chassis #196
Michael Edick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16th, 2012, 11:06 PM   #13
rwindle
Contributing Member
 
rwindle's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 9th, 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 65
Default

Comment 1: I find it interesting that so many British drivers find a way to fund an IndyCar season, either full or partial.

Comment 2: I've seen enough of the current IndyCar product after three races to sustain me for the remainder of the season. I just don't enjoy the show that is IndyCar and the cars are hideous to my eyes.
__________________
Robert
rwindle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 12:25 AM   #14
LAJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5th, 2005
Location: Valley Hi,Ohio
Posts: 478
Default unlucky

You are all just so unlucky !! I JUST SKIPPED THE INDYCAR RACE AND WENT TO MY LOCAL SMALL TOWN AIRPORT TO SEE ABOUT 20- B25s , 1 -P40 , 1-P51, 1-CORSAIR and a JAP -ZERO ALL FLYING AROUND FOR THE NEXT WEEK. IT is the Dolittle Raid Reunion in Urbana,Ohio(Grimes Field)with a day or 2 at Wright Pat in Dayton,Ohio!! Just unreal the sites & sounds of them flying around the field in formation!!!!!!!
Lee
LAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 1:11 AM   #15
Michael Edick
Senior Member
 
Michael Edick's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 3rd, 2003
Location: Pine Grove, CA
Posts: 170
Default

bastard...
__________________
www.mteengineering.com
1976 LeGrand Mk21 FF, chassis #4
1980 Ralt RT5 FSV, chassis #196
Michael Edick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 4:43 PM   #16
LAJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5th, 2005
Location: Valley Hi,Ohio
Posts: 478
Default Comeback

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Edick View Post
bastard...
Oh !! The planes are coming back to Grimes Field for Thursday and Friday so I get to watch F1 Practice then go watch the B25s take off again !!
Lee
LAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 5:37 PM   #17
jim morgan
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: December 11th, 2003
Location: lighthouse point, fl
Posts: 1,010
Default

Marco learned from Michael he never had a wreck that was his fault either.

Still not a fan because of reason above but Rahal chopped him.

Last edited by jim morgan; April 17th, 2012 at 10:04 PM. Reason: further review
jim morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 6:00 PM   #18
SStadel
Forum Advertiser
 
SStadel's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 20th, 2002
Location: Scales Mound IL
Posts: 906
Default

I don't know which race you guys were watching, but as soon as it happened I rewound the DVR because I was sure Rahal moved over on him and that's what I saw. I think you blamed the wrong "lucky sperm" Doug and so does IndyCar. http://news.yahoo.com/rahal-gets-6-r...6429--spt.html
__________________
One Formula Racing
Central Division FE CSR
Central Division National Champ FE '09
www.oneformularacing.com
racer6@mchsi.com
SStadel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 6:20 PM   #19
RSS
Member
 
RSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 15th, 2010
Location: Sylvan lake, Alberta
Posts: 59
Default

I thought the same as you then i watched it again a couple times slower the front wing of Marco turns Rahal you can see Rahals wheels they stay straight while the back of the car steps over from the wing getting under the wheel.

When Marco gets up in the air you can see how far that ginormous front wing sticks out in front of the car and how close he was to the back of Rahal.

and not to mention there was no way he was going to make the corner anyway.
RSS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 6:43 PM   #20
Becker Motorsports
Senior Member
 
Becker Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 7th, 2005
Location: redondo beach, calif.
Posts: 205
Default

I just read that Rahal got a 6 RACE SUSPENSION for his efforts
Becker Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 6:58 PM   #21
Steve Demeter
Contributing Member
 
Steve Demeter's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1st, 2001
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
Posts: 3,566
Default

you of course are kidding, right???

6 race suspension for what is at worst the result of 2 cars trying to be in the same place at the same time.

Did the official types say Rahal was blocking, cause if that is what they thought they need to define blocking. Rahal might have moved a foot or two and he was trying to stay inside of the guy on his left.

Marco was going entierly too fast to even contemplate making the corner.
Steve Demeter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 7:05 PM   #22
R. Pare
Forum Advertiser
 
Join Date: August 18th, 2002
Location: Indy, IN
Posts: 3,413
Default

I'd place the blame on both.

Graham didn't block - he just changed the direction of his line, which is perfectly legal. However, he should have known that Marco is a bit prone to not use his noggin very well.
R. Pare is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 7:39 PM   #23
Tifosi
Contributing Member
 
Tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 7th, 2003
Location: Janesville WI
Posts: 558
Default

Rahal stayed to the middle of the track after exiting the previous corner. He knew Andretti was going to pass him and did whatever he could to prevent that, including moving further to the right. He blocked and he chopped. He's always been a hack.
__________________
Dave
Tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 7:46 PM   #24
Cole Morgan
Senior Member
 
Cole Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 21st, 2006
Location: Lighthouse Point
Posts: 593
Default

Graham got a 6 race PROBATION, not a suspension.

It was Grahams fault. You get one move, but not when the car you're moving to block is already up to your rear wheel. That's not defensive, that's wreckless. I'm the first person to call Marco a bonehead, but Rahal has made himself look foolish in his actions, interviews, and his comments afterwards. I felt Marco had a fairly good interview after the incident considering he was just almost on his lid then piled it into the wall.
__________________
Cole Morgan Racing
c: 954-448-5120
e:colemorganracing@yahoo.com
Cole Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 7:47 PM   #25
Jim Nash
Senior Member
 
Jim Nash's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 14th, 2002
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 270
Default

Not suspended. Probation.

Jim

Oops. Missed by a minute.
__________________
Jim Nash
MissionRaceCars.com
Jim Nash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 9:39 PM   #26
Bruce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25th, 2008
Location: Fremont, Ca.
Posts: 131
Default

Graham admitted to turning into Marco, because he was trying to get under the car in front of him, but he was also on his brakes at the time, so there was no way he was going to pass the car in front of him, however it is the way to make an open wheel car take flight coming up on you.
Bruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 9:46 PM   #27
Cole Morgan
Senior Member
 
Cole Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 21st, 2006
Location: Lighthouse Point
Posts: 593
Default

On a side note, great to see how well that horrendously hideous rear bumper worked at 80 mph, let alone 220...
__________________
Cole Morgan Racing
c: 954-448-5120
e:colemorganracing@yahoo.com
Cole Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 10:20 PM   #28
FVRacer21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 8th, 2005
Location: Torrington CT
Posts: 232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole Morgan View Post
On a side note, great to see how well that horrendously hideous rear bumper worked at 80 mph, let alone 220...
If you look at the accident in slow motion, Marco missed the rear bumper and just caught the rear tire. Only way it could have been prevented was Shelby CanAm style - I think we have to draw the line somewhere.
FVRacer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 11:04 PM   #29
Cole Morgan
Senior Member
 
Cole Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 21st, 2006
Location: Lighthouse Point
Posts: 593
Default

Yeah, it does look like he climbed the side wall and Marco's rear tire tore the bumper/wing off Rahal's car. Good find.

Still, there isn't anything you can do to keep an open wheel car from getting in the air during a wreck like this. The new floor of the DW12 is so big as soon as some air gets under it, the thing turns into an airplane. Imagine this accident at 220 at Indy or Fontana...
__________________
Cole Morgan Racing
c: 954-448-5120
e:colemorganracing@yahoo.com
Cole Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 11:35 PM   #30
Mike Kolthoff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28th, 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 179
Default Shelby

Please let's not bring up the Shelby Can Am car. It helped a nice kid from KY get to Indy but what else? Harrington I think? He and his pops ran a big. SR shop. Nice guy.
Mike Kolthoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 11:38 PM   #31
LAJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5th, 2005
Location: Valley Hi,Ohio
Posts: 478
Default SOARING?

All that surface they will be like kites trying to get off the ground.
That was the first thing I thought of when I saw the new car that and how UGLY it is.
LAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2012, 11:52 PM   #32
Daryl DeArman
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 4th, 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Pare View Post
Graham didn't block - he just changed the direction of his line, which is perfectly legal.
The IRL rules states: " a Driver must not alter his/her racing line based on the actions of pursuing Drivers or use an abnormal racing line to inhibit or prevent passing."

a bit subjective (intentionally, I'm sure) but one would be pretty hard pressed to call his move "perfectly legal"

In any case, a bit optimisitic on Marco's part, and a bit of an asshat on Graham's is how I see it.
__________________
Daryl DeArman
Daryl DeArman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 18th, 2012, 12:10 AM   #33
Daryl DeArman
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 4th, 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Kolthoff View Post
Please let's not bring up the Shelby Can Am car. It helped a nice kid from KY get to Indy but what else? Harrington I think? He and his pops ran a big. SR shop. Nice guy.
Richie Hearn also did a short stint in one. The way I remember it; he came back from winning Elf-Winfield and had zero funding. Wrenched for a team out in Phoenix that was prepping for Craig T. Nelson. Richie got a couple of races in exchange for his wrenching services. Ended up lapping the field out in Phoenix, met Della Penna, went Atlantic, won the Atlantic Championship, finished on the podium at the Indy 500 in 1996. I think all those years in karts helped more than anything else, but it was the Elf Winfield and Shelby Can-Am performance that opened a door or two.
__________________
Daryl DeArman
Daryl DeArman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 18th, 2012, 2:17 AM   #34
mousecatcher
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: November 16th, 2007
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
The IRL rules states: " a Driver must not alter his/her racing line based on the actions of pursuing Drivers or use an abnormal racing line to inhibit or prevent passing."
What year's rule book is that? I haven't seen the rule but from the interwebs it appears the 2012 rule is that one move is now allowed (like almost all other series). Not sure in 2012 why they'd go to that when the no moves rule was designed to promote passing, and IndyCar needs all the help it can get what with Danica gone.
mousecatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 18th, 2012, 11:14 AM   #35
Daryl DeArman
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 4th, 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,041
Default

Here's a bit of the article:
"IndyCar President of Competition and Race Director Beaux Barfield decided against re-wording the blocking rule for the 2012 season. This was a hot topic today, just days before next week’s State of IndyCar address. While he acknowledges that the blocking is open for interpretation, he said that he will make sure the drivers and teams understand the rules going into each race.

The rule states that; a Driver must not alter his/her racing line based on the actions of pursuing Drivers or use an abnormal racing line to inhibit or prevent passing. Barfield said that he didn’t feel a wording change was necessary, but added that he was going to make sure everyone understands the rules before the drivers meeting is over at each event. It had been proposed by some to have lines painted around the track to help drivers better understand what constitutes blocking.

On Tuesday, teams were given the new rulebook for the 2012 season. The new book had been formatted for easier understanding, yet didn’t feature any major changes for the upcoming season....."
Source was: http://openwheelamerica.com/2012/02/...r-2012-season/ perhaps things have morphed a bit since February and I should have seeked a more current source...
__________________
Daryl DeArman
Daryl DeArman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 18th, 2012, 2:50 PM   #36
FVRacer21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 8th, 2005
Location: Torrington CT
Posts: 232
Default

Unfortunately we don't have a good view of the inciident. The angle we have is a long look from the corner.

Watching Rahal, he does not take the "normal" racing line of the like the othe cars, nor even one car width over, but rather drove down the middle of the track. If it was not for that little movement just before the collision, I might have called it for Rahal. But it does look like he was driving with his mirrors in order to keep Marco behind him.

That said, I think Marco had committed to that move the lap before and was going to do the equivalent of a road racing "slide job" on Graham. Very optimistic and worth a talking to but no penalty-it was a high risk, high reward move that didn't work - shades of Lewis Hamiltona?

ChrisZ
FVRacer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 18th, 2012, 10:52 PM   #37
Neil_Roberts
Senior Member
 
Neil_Roberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 8th, 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole Morgan View Post
there isn't anything you can do to keep an open wheel car from getting in the air during a wreck like this.
Sure there is:

1. Big tunnel exits and a short-chord front wing with an airfoil that stalls at a small nose-up angle will produce a net restoring moment up to the top speed of the car. Those were deliberate design features of Swift's proposed Indycar, validated by CFD.

2. The wing mounts and the pushrods on the Formula Atlantic cars are mechanical fuses. They are strong enough for normal operation, but tire-to-tire contact will fold up a corner. That's vastly preferable to flipping the car over. The only contact case I couldn't protect against was tire-to-tire with both the front and rear tires at the same time. Here is what that looks like. Again, Swift's proposed car had features that prevented that case.

3. One way to reduce the penalty for bumping tires is to locate a small roller behind each tire. That would turn the race into a bumper-car show, which might not be the best idea ever.
Neil_Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 18th, 2012, 11:23 PM   #38
Cole Morgan
Senior Member
 
Cole Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 21st, 2006
Location: Lighthouse Point
Posts: 593
Default

Yes, there are ways to reduce the occurrence, but my point was that it is an inherent danger of open-wheel racing.

You can still get one in the air with little effort, not matter how fragile the suspension of the aero profile.
__________________
Cole Morgan Racing
c: 954-448-5120
e:colemorganracing@yahoo.com
Cole Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 19th, 2012, 12:10 AM   #39
mousecatcher
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: November 16th, 2007
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FVRacer21 View Post
Unfortunately we don't have a good view of the inciident. The angle we have is a long look from the corner.

Watching Rahal, he does not take the "normal" racing line of the like the othe cars, nor even one car width over, but rather drove down the middle of the track.
Yep, so we don't need a better view. Rahal was in violation of the no blocking rule, obvious even from the angle we have.

Apparently my corner of the interweb is wrong and it seems clear from Daryl that the rule about maintaining the racing line is still in play for 2012.
mousecatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 19th, 2012, 12:12 PM   #40
Daryl DeArman
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: February 4th, 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mousecatcher View Post
Apparently my corner of the interweb is wrong and it seems clear from Daryl that the rule about maintaining the racing line is still in play for 2012.
The caveat being that the quote I found was from February. Barfield is also quoted as saying that all drivers will understand the blocking rules at each event before the end of the drivers' meeting (paraphrasing). I infer that the interpretation may change from track to track as the season progresses---so who knows what was in place for LBGP other than Barfiled and those at the drivers' meeting? In any event it would seem 6mo probation suggests they think Rahal should have known better.
__________________
Daryl DeArman
Daryl DeArman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 3:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©ApexSpeed 2000-2013