Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: Future of F2000

  1. #1
    Senior Member Jonathan Lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.30.19
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    125
    Liked: 303

    Default Future of F2000

    After watching the Formula Continental Runoffs race @ Indy, I wasn't surprised at all- with the level of competition throughout the field...

    This event has proven that if the F2000 car owners would attend an FRP event, that they would have an amazing race and weekend.
    Last edited by Jonathan Lee; 09.05.23 at 5:28 PM.

  2. The following 3 users liked this post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member EricP's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.22.09
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    978
    Liked: 482

    Default

    I agree FRP seems very well run and worthwhile, I was intimidated by “pro” too but visiting an event I saw that was an unfounded fear. Very laid back and comfortable but professionally run.
    Last edited by EricP; 10.03.21 at 6:59 AM.

  4. The following 4 users liked this post:


  5. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    06.11.19
    Location
    zypher cove, nevada
    Posts
    53
    Liked: 9

    Default Frp

    A lot of us would race somewhere else like frp if across the country scca is all about clases the sell cars too or control the. Lass financially sfr. Fe2. F4 they are sluts for the money so yes frp if across the country is a great option. I would luv to have east coast franchise. Is it available?

  6. #4
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Lee View Post
    This event has proven that if the F2000 car owners would just show up to an FRP event, that they would have an amazing race and weekend.
    Look at where the cars came from and then look at a map for a clue. Geography is a problem.

  7. #5
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tahoe z View Post
    A lot of us would race somewhere else like frp if across the country scca is all about clases the sell cars too or control the. Lass financially sfr. Fe2. F4 they are sluts for the money so yes frp if across the country is a great option. I would luv to have east coast franchise. Is it available?
    Kim,

    Running the FRP style out west would mean charging $2000+ entry fees. Last time I checked Laguna was $14k/day and Sonoma was $18k (plus services). There aren't enough cars to cover costs.

    But inquire. It would be great if someone would sponsor it.

  8. #6
    Senior Member Jonathan Lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.30.19
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    125
    Liked: 303

    Default Unbelievable!

    FRP is a fantastic place, a racer's paradise. The amount of track time is unbelievable, 3 hours a weekend!
    Last edited by Jonathan Lee; 09.05.23 at 5:24 PM.

  9. The following 9 users liked this post:


  10. #7
    Senior Member Pi_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.08.10
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    648
    Liked: 229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Lee View Post
    I don't like spending time on the internet for a couple of reasons...



    I'm not here to debate with the world over my opinions, I'm just trying to promote the class and frankly FRP is a great meeting place for the racer's who are able to attend. If you have nothing positive to add to my observation: you are side tracking my point that I'm trying to bring to those that might be interested in attending races next year.....
    That might work for you but some of have been around for a bit. We have seen the ups and downs and just to discount us or insult the old guys is not going to get you the best result.

    Some of us have been trying to help formula cars grow for years when you alienate groups your not helping.....

  11. The following 2 users liked this post:


  12. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    10.31.07
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,526
    Liked: 1432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Lee View Post

    FRP is a fantastic place, a racer's paradise. Why wouldn't you want 3 hours of track time with the green flag laps and no mix racing?
    Yes, FRP is a great promoter and place to race. For many, it's cost and logistically prohibitive. To your question, it's not a matter of "want", it's a matter of what is feasible. Think of the people you are trying to attract - put yourself in their shoes. Mid-life, family, responsibilities. Some cannot take multiple weeks off of work for travel, being away from their family, nor the cost of doing so. SCCA might not be as grand, but it's cheaper and a lesser time commitment. (That's "cheaper", not "better value".) When you have to foot your own bill and are responsible for all the logistics, it's a different calculation.
    Last edited by reidhazelton; 10.03.21 at 12:20 PM.

  13. The following 6 users liked this post:


  14. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.22.15
    Location
    Westfalia
    Posts
    1,785
    Liked: 1109

    Default

    I read the original post pre-edit, and saw it as honest words from a kid with enough balls to be candid about the sport we all love.

    I also didn’t read them as judging anyone in particular, but rather pointing out the occasional stodginess that time and again has and will turn competitors away.

    Since Jonathan is one of the next wave that will make or break SCCA — and just how often do we hear from the next wave? — I might suggest his words of passion should be considered beyond the presentation details.

  15. The following members LIKED this post:


  16. #10
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by E1pix View Post
    I read the original post pre-edit, and saw it as honest words from a kid with enough balls to be candid about the sport we all love.
    Well, congratulating drivers on a successful SCCA event, and then basically berating participation the SCCA while promoting another series, and then cutting and pasting the same post in FF (or vv) just leaves a bad taste.

    If it was a simple "congrats on the numbers, etc., we'd like to invite you to give FRP (which counts toward runoff quali) a try at least once next year." But no. I wasn't.

    But if Mr. Lee is young he probably has no perspective on how racing fits into life for most of the people he's talking to.
    I'm not sure I'd call it candid. Just not well thought out.

  17. The following members LIKED this post:


  18. #11
    Contributing Member Steve Demeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.01.01
    Location
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
    Posts
    6,360
    Liked: 909

    Default

    Personally I think Jonathan was simply pointing out his personal ideas of what would grow the numbers in FF and FC. Nothing more.

    If anyone wants to take shots at it, well shame on them.

    I see his points as valid, but the FRP series, while undoubtedly a better bang for the buck than SCCA club racing, for me the number of bucks to do the travel necessary is simply more than I have to spend.

    So I continue to run SCCA club races and have as much fun as I can. I would love to be able to do the FRP series, but that aint gonna happen.

    Remember we all want the same things, Formula car numbers to grow. The debate has forever been on how to make that happen.

  19. The following 5 users liked this post:


  20. #12
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Demeter View Post
    Personally I think Jonathan was simply pointing out his personal ideas of what would grow the numbers in FF and FC. Nothing more.
    Time and place incorrect. And it's been debated before.

    This event has proven that if the F2000 car owners would just show up to an FRP event, that they would have an amazing race and weekend.
    So, they didn't have an amazing weekend? Because it wasn't FRP? What does one have to do with the other?

    My problem with the endless bashing of SCCA pro FRP is out west we simply don't have access. We commonly field 12-15 cars and if everyone goes to FRP our class becomes defunct. Midwest-East has a choice, but as happened 2 years ago with F1000, everyone went to a 3rd party series and simply killed the class in SCCA for the rest of the country.

    You want numbers to grow in FRP? Grow SCCA. Don't pi$$ on it. Everyone needs club racers to keep showing up.
    Otherwise F2000 will become a dodo like F1000.

  21. The following 2 users liked this post:


  22. #13
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,517
    Liked: 1480

    Default

    hmmmm. Read, Beerbudget and I have ruminated on this...

    Regardless of the sanction issues:

    FC. NEEDS. NEW. CARS.

    Otherwise, its just 98-08 VD (how many left?) and a dozen odd Mygale, Citation, RFR, and Radons. Oh yeah, and that Pinto/Zetec thing.....

  23. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    01.11.05
    Location
    Zionsville, Indiana
    Posts
    3,170
    Liked: 1398

    Default New Cars

    I think that while new cars are desirable, the cost is way out of line with what most F2000 customers can afford. At today's costs, the engine and transmission assembly alone will eat up over $30,000. A new car with data logging system, setup as many cars are raced, will eat up most of a $100,000 bill. Given that medium income is around $70,000 and the tax cut is close to half that, new FC's are not going to be very common.

    2 things I think can work for the class are the fact that the Pinto engine can be competitive, if not have an edge on the Zetec, and that it is possible to recycle old F2000s into new cars. The parts that can be salvaged from an existing car can reduce the cost of a new car by half or more. It is cheaper to buy a used car for the components that can be reused that it is to buy those same components new.

    The issue here is that to really save money, the guy who is doing the car needs to put his sweat equity into the project and not try to have the work done in a pro shop.

    The same thing is true for F1600 and the Kent engine.

  24. The following 8 users liked this post:


  25. #15
    Contributing Member problemchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.22.02
    Location
    Ransomville, NY
    Posts
    5,729
    Liked: 4349

    Default

    I believe that Jon's message was that we need to participate!

    The masses are not going to buy $100K new race cars to support our current FF/F1600 and FC/F2000. Forget about new cars and let's keep as many of the current cars active and competitive as we can. As Steve says, sweat equity has to be part of that equation.

    FRP, certainly at the current time, is well organized club racing with good race groups and good quantity of track time. People, in other parts of the country, can organize that same coordinated racer group model anywhere, within SCCA or other organizers.

    Formula cars, and club racing in general, has a limited lifespan, as we know it. Our best course is not to have a 20 year plan, but have a 5 year plan. That starts with a 1 year plan. Support SCCA or FRP or your local group by working on your race car today and having it on track for 2022!
    Greg Rice, RICERACEPREP.com
    F1600 Arrive-N-Drive for FRP and SCCA, FC SCCA also. Including Runoffs
    2020 & 2022 F1600 Champion, 2020 SCCA FF Champion, 2021 SCCA FC Champion,
    2016 F2000 Champion, Follow RiceRacePrep on Instagram.


  26. #16
    Senior Member Pi_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.08.10
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    648
    Liked: 229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S Lathrop View Post

    The issue here is that to really save money, the guy who is doing the car needs to put his sweat equity into the project and not try to have the work done in a pro shop.

    The same thing is true for F1600 and the Kent engine.
    Your excluding me.
    I spent most of my time running independents and there were many of them on LI. That market is gone.
    In the 70's I had an argument with the owner of the biggest prep shop on LI at the time, He said all prep work should go though my shop. I said the more race shops you have the bigger the party you will have and more business.

  27. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.22.15
    Location
    Westfalia
    Posts
    1,785
    Liked: 1109

    Default

    After watching FX for the first time at the Runoffs, I asked myself what this class was intended to do... beyond have a place for Star Mazdas (despite their obvious rules disadvantages, as clearly seen in the results).

    Was this class intended as a new place for F2000s after some relatively-lean turnouts at the Runoffs in recent years?

    The turnout in FC this year was epic, and as seen on ApexSpeed, very well-earned! Am I connecting the dots that some of you promoting FC so hard this year was to save the class from forced entry into FX?

  28. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    01.11.05
    Location
    Zionsville, Indiana
    Posts
    3,170
    Liked: 1398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pi_guy View Post
    Your excluding me.
    I spent most of my time running independents and there were many of them on LI. That market is gone.
    In the 70's I had an argument with the owner of the biggest prep shop on LI at the time, He said all prep work should go though my shop. I said the more race shops you have the bigger the party you will have and more business.

    In the 50 years I have been involved with FV, FF, and the classes that followed, I have turned out a bit over 250 cars, I have assembled very few complete cars. Most of the cars I have assembled were the very first cars of each design. After that is was parts for other guys to build cars. I almost never had a prep shop as a customer. My business model was much more like the FV model than what was typical of other formula car classes. The majority of my customers just could not afford to buy a new car, ready to race. Instead they might buy a used car and over time upgrade that package to something was top of the line.

  29. The following 4 users liked this post:


  30. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.01.01
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,306
    Liked: 350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by E1pix View Post
    After watching FX for the first time at the Runoffs, I asked myself what this class was intended to do... beyond have a place for Star Mazdas (despite their obvious rules disadvantages, as clearly seen in the results).

    Was this class intended as a new place for F2000s after some relatively-lean turnouts at the Runoffs in recent years?

    The turnout in FC this year was epic, and as seen on ApexSpeed, very well-earned! Am I connecting the dots that some of you promoting FC so hard this year is a direct result of saving the class from forced entry into FX?
    IIRC, FX was created as a catch all for classes that were in decline and in danger of losing Runoffs eligibility, classes that had limited numbers and were being requested recognition (F2000) and establish an opportunity to build numbers for possible future recognition or at least have a place in the Runoffs program. It was not aimed specifically at FC.
    Peter Olivola
    (polivola@gmail.com)

  31. #20
    Contributing Member DaveW's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.25.01
    Location
    Bath, OH
    Posts
    6,175
    Liked: 3289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Olivola View Post
    IIRC, FX was created as a catch all for classes that were in decline and in danger of losing Runoffs eligibility, classes that had limited numbers and were being requested recognition (F2000) and establish an opportunity to build numbers for possible future recognition or at least have a place in the Runoffs program. It was not aimed specifically at FC.
    Those are the Mazda-powered ex-"US F2000's" which are not legal in FC.
    Dave Weitzenhof

  32. The following members LIKED this post:


  33. #21
    Senior Member Pi_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.08.10
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    648
    Liked: 229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S Lathrop View Post
    In the 50 years I have been involved with FV, FF, and the classes that followed, I have turned out a bit over 250 cars, I have assembled very few complete cars. Most of the cars I have assembled were the very first cars of each design. After that is was parts for other guys to build cars. I almost never had a prep shop as a customer. My business model was much more like the FV model than what was typical of other formula car classes. The majority of my customers just could not afford to buy a new car, ready to race. Instead they might buy a used car and over time upgrade that package to something was top of the line.

    One of your fairly recently very successful cars was run by a prep shop.
    My thoughts are if your just focusing on one segment like the cost conservative group you not going to grow the numbers of participation in formula car racing.

    Willing to bet if you had kept a roller in stock you would have sold a few that way.

    But as I have said I have no solution, and I doubt the answer is to narrow your base.

  34. #22
    Contributing Member EricP's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.22.09
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    978
    Liked: 482

    Default

    Purple Frog, LaRue, Rice, Averill are all guys that make lots of good, positive, and encouraging posts for the class that attracted me. I think they and those like them deserve some credit for helping runoffs numbers and can be a model for keeping numbers going. Regardless of prep shop, new, used, etc.

  35. The following 3 users liked this post:


  36. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    06.11.19
    Location
    zypher cove, nevada
    Posts
    53
    Liked: 9

    Default Fc future

    Allow sequential gear box and maybe turbo on zetec or what I would do eco boost crate engine appeal to young kids we could do it. 20 k and class can live we are like 2 Nd gen Rx7 will race a long time but in deceasing numbers I do all my own work engine s body work this is a cheap class to race and great people it would make a great car kids would want to race but again scca would probably block but you are all great to race with let’s keep racing

  37. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    06.11.19
    Location
    zypher cove, nevada
    Posts
    53
    Liked: 9

  38. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    06.11.19
    Location
    zypher cove, nevada
    Posts
    53
    Liked: 9

    Default Fc future

    Fe2 trans and 10/8 wheels below 20k great car

  39. #26
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,517
    Liked: 1480

    Default

    if the class has become too expensive for what the market will bear, then it needs a change to the formula to survive. Otherwise, its just rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic.

  40. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    06.02.02
    Location
    St Charles, Mo
    Posts
    546
    Liked: 159

    Default Scca club versus FRP

    Both club racing and FRP are beneficial to the formula classes.
    If you want to keep your class alive and well run as many races as you can.
    If that means staying close to home, run both club and FRP events that are within travel distance.
    You don't have travel long distance if you're not competing for championships.

    Jerry Hodges.
    JDR race cars.
    North American formula 1000 championship.

    PS: f1000 is alive and growing in FRP

  41. #28
    Contributing Member problemchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.22.02
    Location
    Ransomville, NY
    Posts
    5,729
    Liked: 4349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Kirchner View Post
    ..... rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic.
    I love this analogy, I also love, that in this case, it is the best strategy! Let's see if we can keep the old boat afloat for another 5-10 years. It is too late for us to avoid the iceberg. or build a new boat. But we have enough deck chairs to keep us going, especially if we bring out those that were not allowed on deck previously. And when the boat does go down, deck chairs do float, and can be moved to another boat. What we don't need, is better, newer, more expensive deck chairs.

    Now is the time to work on your deck chair and make sure you can use it next season!



    Last edited by problemchild; 10.20.21 at 1:53 PM.
    Greg Rice, RICERACEPREP.com
    F1600 Arrive-N-Drive for FRP and SCCA, FC SCCA also. Including Runoffs
    2020 & 2022 F1600 Champion, 2020 SCCA FF Champion, 2021 SCCA FC Champion,
    2016 F2000 Champion, Follow RiceRacePrep on Instagram.

  42. The following 5 users liked this post:


  43. #29
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by problemchild View Post
    Now is the time to work on your deck chair and make sure you can use it next season!
    Still one event to go !

  44. #30
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,517
    Liked: 1480

    Default

    well it is the vintage strategy. you all just refuse to accept or recognize it.

  45. #31
    Senior Member sauce_racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.24.06
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    245
    Liked: 81

    Default Wow

    Some of the negativity on this post is pretty disappointing.
    Maybe the message wasn't delivered as one would've liked from Jonathan. However, knowing him I can tell you his intention with this post isn't to offend of piss off anyone. It was to encourage participation. Be it SCCA or FRP. He wants you driving your cars. We all want that or else we wouldn't still have cars collecting dust in our garages. (I'm guilty of a dusty racecar I can't drive right now, not trying to throw shade anyone's way)

    Not being able to race FRP because of logistics is the number one reason most people don't race FRP. I'm in that boat as I live in Texas, I'm a full time nursing student and Mom. Does that mean I want to jump on him for his post because it doesn't fit my current lifestyle? No. It means I am glad someone else wants me out driving my car whether its in FRP or not. Moral of the message.. Drive your racecar and have fun with it. There's enough to complain about inside and outside of racing.

    We wonder why younger people struggle to get into our sport and continue to grow it. Granted not everyone can afford to get into open wheel racing, but that's another post for another time. But the general attitude of jump on the young guy suggesting participation doesn't make me want to run out and tell the other 20-30 something's that I know 'go buy a FF or FC and go racing with me'.

    Jump on me if you must. This is my quarterly login to ApexSpeed as I have critical care of adults and labor and delivery finals coming up.

    Meg Sauce
    SowDiv FF10
    Swift DB6 Honda

  46. The following 5 users liked this post:


  47. #32
    Senior Member Pi_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.08.10
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    648
    Liked: 229

    Default

    A good engineer focus on both the positive and negative aspects of a problem. Pretending that the problem does not exist or covering the ears and eyes and not seeing both sides leads to a big pile of crap.

    Many moons ago when there was not so much competition you could live in your own bubble now it is not going to help.

  48. The following members LIKED this post:


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social