Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Classifieds Super License Rick Iverson's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.05.02
    Location
    Destin FL
    Posts
    4,842
    Liked: 645

    Default Wheel Reconfiguring

    Gents;

    I have OZ five (5) spoke wheels on my RF95.

    I have noticed newest editions of OZ, Technos, Jongbloed and others have modeled their spokes to be very thin. And they look hot!

    Q: From an engineering as well as safety POV, can I have my OZ spokes machined as to split the five (5) spokes to reveal ten (10) spokes, and retain wheel structural integrity. This is simply cosmetic.
    V/r

    Iverson

  2. #2
    Contributing Member DaveW's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.25.01
    Location
    Bath, OH
    Posts
    6,161
    Liked: 3279

    Default Caution...

    I'd be VERY careful, studying the effect on braking and acceleration bending stresses in the spokes. If you go to 10 narrow from 5 wide (in side view) you are reducing the resistance to yielding or cracking, even if you don't actually cut out any metal except for the cut width, by a factor of 4 or more. IIRC, the bending strength in the circumferential direction is related to the side-view width^3, and if they are reduced to 1/2 as wide, the bending stresses would be ~4 times what they were before (double the # of spokes, but each 1/8 as strong).

    Stress concentrations at the ends of the spokes must also be considered, since they may make the stresses a lot higher than the above.

    So unless this is ONLY for show, I wouldn't do it w/o a serious stress analysis.

    Of course, this depends on the spokes' actual side-view shape, which I don't know, so YMMV.
    Last edited by DaveW; 02.28.21 at 11:32 AM.
    Dave Weitzenhof

  3. The following 2 users liked this post:


  4. #3
    Classifieds Super License Rick Iverson's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.05.02
    Location
    Destin FL
    Posts
    4,842
    Liked: 645

    Default

    Dave;

    Right as rain. Stock, powder coat some crazy hot color, then go racing.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveW View Post
    I'd be VERY careful, studying the effect on braking and acceleration bending stresses in the spokes. If you go to 10 narrow from 5 wide (in side view) you are reducing the resistance to yielding or cracking, even if you don't actually cut out any metal except for the cut width, by a factor of 4 or more. IIRC, the bending strength in the circumferential direction is related to the side-view width^3, and if they are reduced to 1/2 as wide, the bending stresses would be ~4 times what they were before (double the # of spokes, but each 1/8 as strong).

    Stress concentrations at the ends of the spokes must also be considered, since they may make the stresses a lot higher than the above.

    So unless this is ONLY for show, I wouldn't do it w/o a serious stress analysis.

    Of course, this depends on the spokes' actual side-view shape, which I don't know, so YMMV.
    V/r

    Iverson

  5. The following 2 users liked this post:


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social