Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Jim Garry's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.04.03
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    1,861
    Liked: 235

    Default Questions about '88 Van Diemen 1600

    Was the '88 Van Diemen considered a good car or something to stay away from? Does anyone have any information to offer?


    Thanks,
    Jim


    I wish I understood everything I know.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    10.20.07
    Location
    Deep River, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    320
    Liked: 120

    Default RF 88 Van Diemen

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Garry View Post
    Was the '88 Van Diemen considered a good car or something to stay away from? Does anyone have any information to offer?


    Thanks,

    Excellent safe cars. Reasonable parts availability inc. bodywork. Bell housing to upper chassis is a problem area but can be fixed. Threads pull out.

    Put some heavy sway bars on, drop the rear and lean on it.

    KR

  3. #3
    Contributing Member Jim Garry's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.04.03
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    1,861
    Liked: 235

    Default

    Thanks Ken
    Jim


    I wish I understood everything I know.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Buc01's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.26.10
    Location
    Moore, OK
    Posts
    518
    Liked: 73

    Default

    '85 and '86 cars are better. '88 cars problem is the rear. I ran one in Canada on the treaded tires and it was good.
    Back in the states with slicks, the rear of the car was not stiff enough. Had the threads pull out of the bell housing as well.

    NOTE: I would recommend the '91 car, is a great chassis. Full push rod suspension front and rear. '88 car was push rod front rocker rear.

    Just my 2 cents worth from someone who spent a LOT of time preparing and running '85/'88/and '91 chassis.

    Aaron

    Quote Originally Posted by Robins Ken View Post
    Excellent safe cars. Reasonable parts availability inc. bodywork. Bell housing to upper chassis is a problem area but can be fixed. Threads pull out.

    Put some heavy sway bars on, drop the rear and lean on it.

    KR

  5. #5
    Contributing Member Jim Garry's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.04.03
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    1,861
    Liked: 235

    Default

    I agree that I'd prefer a 91. But none available at this time. The 88 is. There's also an inexpensive 86. But probably I should be patient.

    Thanks for the info.
    Jim


    I wish I understood everything I know.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    12.20.11
    Location
    new zealand
    Posts
    226
    Liked: 110

    Default

    a RF90 and a RF91 are 'almost' the same (this doubles your chances of finding one...).

  7. #7
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.26.06
    Location
    Courtice, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    446
    Liked: 131

    Default

    If a decent RF88 came up for sale at a reasonable price I wouldn't hesitate to buy it. I think they're brilliant cars.
    Stephen Adams
    RF92 Van Diemen FFord
    1980 Lola T540 FFord

  8. #8
    Contributing Member Jim Garry's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.04.03
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    1,861
    Liked: 235

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by old 59 View Post
    If a decent RF88 came up for sale at a reasonable price I wouldn't hesitate to buy it. I think they're brilliant cars.
    Thanks Stephen. How does it compare to your 92?
    Jim


    I wish I understood everything I know.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Buc01's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.26.10
    Location
    Moore, OK
    Posts
    518
    Liked: 73

    Default

    By the way, I never seen an '88 go faster than when Stephen was driving it! The chassis and him are were very good on treaded tires that the Canadian Pro series ran back in the late '80's and early '90's.

    Aaron


    Quote Originally Posted by old 59 View Post
    If a decent RF88 came up for sale at a reasonable price I wouldn't hesitate to buy it. I think they're brilliant cars.

  10. #10
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.26.06
    Location
    Courtice, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    446
    Liked: 131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buc01 View Post
    By the way, I never seen an '88 go faster than when Stephen was driving it! The chassis and him are were very good on treaded tires that the Canadian Pro series ran back in the late '80's and early '90's.

    Aaron
    Thanks Aaron.

    Jim; I believe the RF 92 is ultimately faster than the RF 88...but not a lot. Really a completely different animal as far as a FF goes IMHO. Both have their pros and cons. Probably easier to find parts for the 90-92 era cars as well. I also had an RF 91 back in the day. If I had to choose between any of my past cars the RF 91 would get the nod. PM me if you have more questions.
    Stephen Adams
    RF92 Van Diemen FFord
    1980 Lola T540 FFord

  11. #11
    Contributing Member Jim Garry's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.04.03
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    1,861
    Liked: 235

    Default

    Thank you
    Jim


    I wish I understood everything I know.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social