Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 44 of 44
  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    05.11.07
    Location
    Southeast MI
    Posts
    735
    Liked: 254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark elder View Post
    Where does rake come in here? In the past I might have altered rear ride height with (say) half a turn on the rear pushrods and this would quickly sort exit oversteer.

    I guess my puzzle is both rear ARB and rake alter exit oversteer/understeer but when should I use one tool vs the other. Clearly I want to keep my nice turn in while having a balanced exit.
    Dave's comment in regard to the roll center height is spot on. I just want to comment on using one versus the other. Generally speaking, in my experience, ARB changes have a greater magnitude to handling balance change relative to RCH (roll center height) changes. There is a caveat though, it depends on how much your RCH changes with ride height. Without measuring the RCH and knowing the roll stiffness contribution of the ARB it is impossible to be sure, but you can evaluate both of those and quantify their respective changes in magnitude. Personally, beyond simply a handling adjustment knob I also use this to data evaluate ride height changes vs spring rate changes. That way I can change both at the same time and end up with a car that has the same oversteer/understeer balance.

  2. #42
    Contributing Member DaveW's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.25.01
    Location
    Bath, OH
    Posts
    6,161
    Liked: 3279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2BWise View Post
    Dave's comment in regard to the roll center height is spot on. I just want to comment on using one versus the other. Generally speaking, in my experience, ARB changes have a greater magnitude to handling balance change relative to RCH (roll center height) changes. There is a caveat though, it depends on how much your RCH changes with ride height. Without measuring the RCH and knowing the roll stiffness contribution of the ARB it is impossible to be sure, but you can evaluate both of those and quantify their respective changes in magnitude. Personally, beyond simply a handling adjustment knob I also use this to data evaluate ride height changes vs spring rate changes. That way I can change both at the same time and end up with a car that has the same oversteer/understeer balance.
    I have had both scenarios. On my Z16, the rear swaybar was quite soft, and made little difference in balance. OTOH, rear ride height (roll center height) was my main tuning tool. 1/8" change in RH was a BIG change in balance.

    On other cars, rear swaybar stiffness made more difference. So it depends on the exact setup of your particular car.
    Dave Weitzenhof

  3. The following members LIKED this post:


  4. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    12.20.11
    Location
    new zealand
    Posts
    226
    Liked: 110

    Default

    Thanks guys. I had not thought this through properly. It now seems obvious to state that an ARB only affects a car dynamically when roll is changing (shocks would be in the same situation; they are not changing length in a steady state).

    And in a smooth transition from turning in through to the exit, roll change is slow and gradual.

    I am guessing that around the apex region, the amount of roll does not alter much (assuming a smooth driver etc). Therefore any change in power around this will be mainly affected by rake (assuming no loss of traction on exit). If this is true, my power induced oversteer is best modulated by altering rake.

    Have I got this correct?

    Thanks

  5. #44
    Contributing Member DaveW's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.25.01
    Location
    Bath, OH
    Posts
    6,161
    Liked: 3279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark elder View Post
    Thanks guys. I had not thought this through properly. It now seems obvious to state that an ARB only affects a car dynamically when roll is changing (shocks would be in the same situation; they are not changing length in a steady state).

    And in a smooth transition from turning in through to the exit, roll change is slow and gradual.

    I am guessing that around the apex region, the amount of roll does not alter much (assuming a smooth driver etc). Therefore any change in power around this will be mainly affected by rake (assuming no loss of traction on exit). If this is true, my power induced oversteer is best modulated by altering rake.

    Have I got this correct?

    Thanks
    It would seem so. But, obviously, you need to try it to definitively assess its effect.

    And, of course, you have to remember that power application should cause the rear to squat, reducing rake and power oversteer unless:

    o the springs are too stiff
    o the bump damping is too high
    o the rear suspension has anti-squat built in - one of the main offenders in creating power oversteer.

    So there are a lot of variables to consider when diagnosing power oversteer. Nothing is as simple as it first appears.
    Last edited by DaveW; 10.29.19 at 9:09 AM.
    Dave Weitzenhof

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social