Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default Fuel cell rotary molded vs bladder

    I have been looking at new fuel cells and the one which will fit my car the best is a rotary molded (hard rubber) fuel safe. All the other wedge shaped cells are a softer bladder material. Both are rated the same. Is the hard rubber less safe in an incident?

    Robby
    Zink Z10

  2. #2
    Classifieds Super License
    Join Date
    11.14.16
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    30
    Liked: 2

    Default fuel cell bladder vs rotomold

    Quote Originally Posted by BorkRacing View Post
    I have been looking at new fuel cells and the one which will fit my car the best is a rotary molded (hard rubber) fuel safe. All the other wedge shaped cells are a softer bladder material. Both are rated the same. Is the hard rubber less safe in an incident?

    Robby
    Zink Z10
    For what it is worth: CVAR down here in Texas specifies bladder type fuel cells. I am currently going through
    A Lola equipped with a rotomold tank and intend to take it to the next race to get a specific yes or no from the tech inspectors. I will post the result.
    Nick L.

  3. #3
    Contributing Member DanW's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.22.03
    Location
    Benicia, Calif
    Posts
    3,125
    Liked: 947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BorkRacing View Post
    I have been looking at new fuel cells and the one which will fit my car the best is a rotary molded (hard rubber) fuel safe. All the other wedge shaped cells are a softer bladder material. Both are rated the same. Is the hard rubber less safe in an incident?

    Robby
    Zink Z10
    Robby,

    Have you tried having your existing cell repaired and recertified? I have a cad drawing if you need dimensions for a new cell.

    Dan
    “Racing makes heroin addiction look like a vague wish for something salty.” -Peter Egan

  4. #4
    Classifieds Super License
    Join Date
    11.14.16
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    30
    Liked: 2

    Default CVAR approves RotoMold tanks...

    Quote Originally Posted by nickal View Post
    For what it is worth: CVAR down here in Texas specifies bladder type fuel cells. I am currently going through
    A Lola equipped with a rotomold tank and intend to take it to the next race to get a specific yes or no from the tech inspectors. I will post the result.
    Nick L.
    Well, the CVAR tech guys said the rotomold tank was just fine. Make sure foasm is fresh. and enclose the tank in an aluminium container.
    NL

  5. #5
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,524
    Liked: 1488

    Default

    The problem with that solution is that you won't be able to race it anywhere else....

  6. #6
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default

    Fuel Safe recertified the cell, building new container.
    I have a brand new Fuel safe cell that does not fit.

    Rob

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Kirchner View Post
    The problem with that solution is that you won't be able to race it anywhere else....
    Not sure I agree with you Rick. The GCR states: . "All safetyfuel bladders shall be constructed and certified in accordance with the FIAFT-3 or higher (FT-3.5, FT-5, etc.) or SFI 28.3 specifications" <snip> "All safety fuel cells shall consist of a foam-filledfuel bladder enclosed in a metal container at minimum."


    Then from ATL's own site the FIA FT-3 Sports Cell properties specifically refer to the "bladder" as a "Hard rubber all fuel bladder".

  8. #8
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default

    It says FIA/SCCA approved on the cell. Can't imagine it a problem as the car I am putting it in previous owner had a only a bladder with no metal container and it passed tech....

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    Not sure I agree with you Rick. The GCR states: . "All safetyfuel bladders shall be constructed and certified in accordance with the FIAFT-3 or higher (FT-3.5, FT-5, etc.) or SFI 28.3 specifications" <snip> "All safety fuel cells shall consist of a foam-filledfuel bladder enclosed in a metal container at minimum."


    Then from ATL's own site the FIA FT-3 Sports Cell properties specifically refer to the "bladder" as a "Hard rubber all fuel bladder".

  9. #9
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,524
    Liked: 1488

    Default

    when you said roto-molded I was thinking of those heavy plastic cells. didn't realize there was a roto-molded cell that passed the FIA spec.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Kirchner View Post
    when you said roto-molded I was thinking of those heavy plastic cells. didn't realize there was a roto-molded cell that passed the FIA spec.

    You are on the right path....almost like the JAZ type cheap-o cells or catch cans...just with foam inside and placed in a metal enclosure. They aren't as flexible as your what we think of when we think "fuel cell bladder", but not so rigid that you envision it shattering/cracking if hit with a hammer. ATL calls it "semi-rigid" in their marketing literature.

    Personally, I wouldn't use one, but that's likely due to my ignorance about them and the FT3 spec. I would prefer to stick with something that deforms to a large degree with the enclosure.

  11. #11
    Contributing Member Rick Kirchner's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.24.02
    Location
    Tehachapi, CA
    Posts
    6,524
    Liked: 1488

    Default

    JAZ was specifically what I was thinking about....

  12. #12
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    You are on the right path....almost like the JAZ type cheap-o cells or catch cans...just with foam inside and placed in a metal enclosure. They aren't as flexible as your what we think of when we think "fuel cell bladder", but not so rigid that you envision it shattering/cracking if hit with a hammer. ATL calls it "semi-rigid" in their marketing literature.

    Personally, I wouldn't use one, but that's likely due to my ignorance about them and the FT3 spec. I would prefer to stick with something that deforms to a large degree with the enclosure.
    Appears to be able to deform closely to the "other" bladders but at that point you should really be worrying about how much YOU can deform. i have seen all types of fuel cells ripped from PRod cars, both types hold up and both types rip open. Maybe if we didn't use the minimum allowed metal thickness for the containers they would be safer as well.

  13. #13
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    You are on the right path....almost like the JAZ type cheap-o cells or catch cans...just with foam inside and placed in a metal enclosure. They aren't as flexible as your what we think of when we think "fuel cell bladder", but not so rigid that you envision it shattering/cracking if hit with a hammer. ATL calls it "semi-rigid" in their marketing literature.

    Personally, I wouldn't use one, but that's likely due to my ignorance about them and the FT3 spec. I would prefer to stick with something that deforms to a large degree with the enclosure.
    Oddly both types of bladders have the same FIA specs. So either the roto-molded bladder is better than suspected or the flexible bladder isn't as good as originally thought.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BorkRacing View Post
    Oddly both types of bladders have the same FIA specs. So either the roto-molded bladder is better than suspected or the flexible bladder isn't as good as originally thought.

    Or both...

  15. #15
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl DeArman View Post
    Or both...
    If it was SCCA alone I would worry more...

  16. #16
    Member Drake's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.31.11
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    81
    Liked: 17

    Default

    Any word as to which lasts longer or there ability to handle ethanol?

  17. #17
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    02.20.17
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    807
    Liked: 269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    Any word as to which lasts longer or there ability to handle ethanol?
    All cells with FT3 rating are good for 5 years and can be recertified for 2 more. Not sure if the are ethanol compatable but ATL says they are high impact and heat resistant, and balistically self healing. Also they are not plastic as the Jaz cells, but a molded hard rubber, just like that one in your wallet from jr high school!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social