Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 120 of 480
  1. #81
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HazelNut View Post
    god the last thing we need in ANOTHER new class to "save open wheel" all the previous iterations have been still born.

    In case nobody has noticed, there is a fire sale going on currently for developed capable reliable FCs.

    The problem isn't "the right cheap car" these days gents, it's an overall lack of interest in this type of racing and new blood.
    This isn't meant to be a 'we don't need another class' thread. Just a open forum to collate ideas.

    Perhaps there is a reason there is an overall lack of interest? Perhaps what's out there is not that attractive to potential new racers.

  2. #82
    Senior Member Stan Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.14.03
    Location
    Mooresville NC area
    Posts
    4,157
    Liked: 309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    Subject: FB w/out wings and a restricted motor.

    Except for the cost Stan. Has to be a common fixed very simple design. Current Roller FBs cost north of $50K with no spares, data etc.

    How much could you sell a redesigned Dauntless/Stohr for, given the direction of this discussion?

    I know that I could do a stretched and widened Blade with a conventional FF type body for the target $20K price, but my days as a builder are done and over. I want to get in the seat again.
    No, I can't "redesign" the D-S for anything like that target price. Even building a very basic car based on the Stohr chassis for that price is not possible. I recall some years ago Steve Lathrop talking about FFs back in the day priced at about the median household income, which is a shade north of $50k these days.

    Could I do such a turnkey car for $50k? Yes, but only if it were very tightly spec'd based on our existing tooling, and with no competition. As soon as Jerry, Gary, or anybody else gets into the mix cost go up (not down!), and the economic viability of the concept goes out the window.

    Back when I was on the CRB Erik Skirmants and I used to discuss FE periodically, and one comment he made has stuck with me ever since: the year the Club set the price under $30k they sold 50+ cars. Then the price began climbing towards the cost of production, and every time the price went up the sales went down. I don't know what the total is any more, but it's barely above 100 cars sold, and last I checked the price was north of $50k (can't find a price on their website).
    Stan Clayton
    Stohr Cars

  3. #83
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Bamford View Post

    Also most people are focused on the purchase price of the car, I find the purchase price lower on the list of requirements. Usually whatever you pay for the car you can re sell in a year or two for approx 70% or more then the purchase price for the car you bought (if you bought a used car, new the numbers might be different as they are on road cars as well). So it is a depreciating asset, but still has value. It sure is a smaller cost then the continued operating cost of a car as those are dollars spent & gone out the window not recoverable.
    Perhaps this type of formula is not aimed at you if purchase price is not that important? Obviously the car itself has to tick lots of boxes (boxes to be determined!) but I can't afford a $50k F4 car but can afford one half that price. I don't think I'm alone in that group.

  4. The following 4 users liked this post:


  5. #84
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.03.00
    Location
    Chatham Center, New York
    Posts
    2,188
    Liked: 862

    Default

    Steve, I think you hit the nail on the head- its not the cost of the car, its the cost of racing: Track costs have risen steeply in the last few years. Tires, crew, Hotels, transport, time away all figure into the cost of racing. The car itself can be amortized over 3 or 4 years, then sold such that its not that big a component.

    The FIA F4 platform and its future iterations (F3, BRDC F4 and other variations) may offer the best bang for open wheel racing going forward, but that's only one component of the total.
    ----------
    In memory of Joe Stimola and Glenn Phillips

  6. #85
    Contributing Member RussMcB's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.19.02
    Location
    Palm Coast, FL
    Posts
    6,680
    Liked: 553

    Default

    It's hard to believe the cost of racing a new F4 car could be anything less than 4x the cost of racing a Spec Miata (but I don't know that for sure).

  7. The following members LIKED this post:


  8. #86
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SEComposites View Post
    Perhaps this type of formula is not aimed at you if purchase price is not that important? Obviously the car itself has to tick lots of boxes (boxes to be determined!) but I can't afford a $50k F4 car but can afford one half that price. I don't think I'm alone in that group.
    In that case my 50k new F4 car, based on numbers I listed above should be worth 35 k in a few years & closer to the numbers you are looking at.

    Can a car be built for 20 - 30 k new with all the boxes ticked asked for? I have heard many say yes but no one has stepped up to the plate and done it. Also if you are talking about a "kit" car that you can build for 20 k as some have suggested here then you are valuing your time at zero. I can't build a car as I do not have the skill set to do so, thus my 20 k will cost me 30-40 k most likely.
    Steve Bamford

  9. #87
    Senior Member Spengo's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.23.12
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    239
    Liked: 121

    Default

    Maybe the problem is the perfect club racecar already exists... its just not open wheel. Spec racer ford is a single-seat, open-cockpit, purpose-built racecar that costs about as much as a miata, requires about as much maintenance as a miata, and goes about as fast as a miata. Its also the only SCCA class that can rival spec miata racing fields. Sure, its a bit ugly, but that doesn't seem to affect its popularity much. I don't know if its possible for any new open wheel class to be able to compete with that and attract all the low budget, low off track time commitment, driver skill only club racers who want a purpose-built racecar instead of a sports car. Why take a chance on something new and unproven when something already exists that has cheap old used cars available and the promise of a big field to race with forever?

  10. The following members LIKED this post:


  11. #88
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussMcB View Post
    It's hard to believe the cost of racing a new F4 car could be anything less than 4x the cost of racing a Spec Miata (but I don't know that for sure).
    The new F4 is about $57K without an engine which is leased from HPD.

    Not low cost racing IMO.
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  12. The following members LIKED this post:


  13. #89
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    I see what your saying but of course your maths works in my favor too when a $25k car is worth $16k a few years later.
    As I say I'm just interested in opinions and specs for such a car should it ever come to fruition. Obviously it may not be possible. But then again maybe it is.

  14. #90
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussMcB View Post
    It's hard to believe the cost of racing a new F4 car could be anything less than 4x the cost of racing a Spec Miata (but I don't know that for sure).
    Russ,

    Why do you say that? Isn't track time, hotels, crew the same dollars spent as it would be with F4? As I understand the parts are cost controlled by FIA so should not be near what some other open wheel parts cost.

    I have no clue what Spec Miata racing costs are per weekend either. It does obviously attract a lot of drivers & would be interesting to compete with that many cars. I am just an open wheel fan & not interested at this point of Miata or other closed roof racing.

    I have a F4 car ordered, hoping the series does well but wouldn't say I huge supporter thinking it will be the class to change racing. I simply want to be part of possible growing series from the start. If there is another latest & greatest class offered & has big turn out because overall low costs I will make sure I heavily consider racing there & hope it can be done.
    Steve Bamford

  15. #91
    Contributing Member formulasuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.17.03
    Location
    Marietta,Ga.
    Posts
    2,710
    Liked: 61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spengo View Post
    Maybe the problem is the perfect club racecar already exists... its just not open wheel. Spec racer ford is a single-seat, open-cockpit, purpose-built racecar that costs about as much as a miata, requires about as much maintenance as a miata, and goes about as fast as a miata. Its also the only SCCA class that can rival spec miata racing fields. Sure, its a bit ugly, but that doesn't seem to affect its popularity much. I don't know if its possible for any new open wheel class to be able to compete with that and attract all the low budget, low off track time commitment, driver skill only club racers who want a purpose-built racecar instead of a sports car. Why take a chance on something new and unproven when something already exists that has cheap old used cars available and the promise of a big field to race with forever?
    Because: open wheel.
    Scott Woodruff
    83 RT5 Ralt/Scooteria Suzuki Formula S

    (former) F440/F5/FF/FC/FA
    65 FFR Cobra Roadster 4.6 DOHC

  16. The following 2 users liked this post:


  17. #92
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spengo View Post
    Maybe the problem is the perfect club racecar already exists... its just not open wheel. Spec racer ford is a single-seat, open-cockpit, purpose-built racecar that costs about as much as a miata, requires about as much maintenance as a miata, and goes about as fast as a miata. Its also the only SCCA class that can rival spec miata racing fields. Sure, its a bit ugly, but that doesn't seem to affect its popularity much. I don't know if its possible for any new open wheel class to be able to compete with that and attract all the low budget, low off track time commitment, driver skill only club racers who want a purpose-built racecar instead of a sports car. Why take a chance on something new and unproven when something already exists that has cheap old used cars available and the promise of a big field to race with forever?
    A good point. No offense intended to any SRF racers but they are pretty hideous machines to look at. Yes they have reasonable grids but I see that fact as being inspite of the car. The basic recipe is sound though. Rugged reliable and cheap (ish). I don't want to race a closed wheel car though, that's my problem!

  18. #93
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by formulasuper View Post
    Because: open wheel.
    Bingo!

  19. The following members LIKED this post:


  20. #94
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stan Clayton View Post
    No, I can't "redesign" the D-S for anything like that target price. Even building a very basic car based on the Stohr chassis for that price is not possible. I recall some years ago Steve Lathrop talking about FFs back in the day priced at about the median household income, which is a shade north of $50k these days.

    Could I do such a turnkey car for $50k? Yes, but only if it were very tightly spec'd based on our existing tooling, and with no competition. As soon as Jerry, Gary, or anybody else gets into the mix cost go up (not down!), and the economic viability of the concept goes out the window.

    Back when I was on the CRB Erik Skirmants and I used to discuss FE periodically, and one comment he made has stuck with me ever since: the year the Club set the price under $30k they sold 50+ cars. Then the price began climbing towards the cost of production, and every time the price went up the sales went down. I don't know what the total is any more, but it's barely above 100 cars sold, and last I checked the price was north of $50k (can't find a price on their website).
    Our current cost for a quantity 1 build F600 Blade is right at the target price we are talking about. We could easily get a couple $K out of the cost with much simpler bodywork. A simpler Tig welded frame would also save some $$. The biggest savings would be from quantity production. Also there is the possibility of saving some $$ by using some production doner car parts and steel 13" wheels.

    IMO it can be done.
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  21. #95
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    The new F4 is about $57K without an engine which is leased from HPD.

    Not low cost racing IMO.
    Cost I believe is a low 50's then lease for 6 k per season & after 3 seasons you own the engine and during that time the manufacture warranties the engine.

    Not low cost such as 20-30 k but I still haven't seen that happen & for sure won't be a carbon tub, data, wings, paddles...not that everyone wants those options either. Keep in mind for what you are getting for the price.
    Steve Bamford

  22. #96
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Bamford View Post
    Cost I believe is a low 50's then lease for 6 k per season & after 3 seasons you own the engine and during that time the manufacture warranties the engine.

    Not low cost such as 20-30 k but I still haven't seen that happen & for sure won't be a carbon tub, data, wings, paddles...not that everyone wants those options either. Keep in mind for what you are getting for the price.
    Of course. What you are getting is very different from an F4 with all the whizzy bits.

    The quote was $57k for a roller, no engine.
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  23. #97
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    Of course. What you are getting is very different from an F4 with all the whizzy bits.

    The quote was $57k for a roller, no engine.
    Car is $45k for a roller.
    Steve Bamford

  24. #98
    Contributing Member RussMcB's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.19.02
    Location
    Palm Coast, FL
    Posts
    6,680
    Liked: 553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Bamford View Post
    Russ,

    Why do you say that?
    Steve, you're probably right. I guess my main objection is the initial buy-in alone puts it far out of reach for someone like me.

  25. #99
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jnovak View Post
    The new F4 is about $57K without an engine which is leased from HPD.

    Not low cost racing IMO.
    $45k not $57k
    Steve Bamford

  26. #100
    Contributing Member dsmithwc04's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.30.07
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,135
    Liked: 177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stan Clayton View Post
    No, I can't "redesign" the D-S for anything like that target price. Even building a very basic car based on the Stohr chassis for that price is not possible. I recall some years ago Steve Lathrop talking about FFs back in the day priced at about the median household income, which is a shade north of $50k these days.

    Could I do such a turnkey car for $50k? Yes, but only if it were very tightly spec'd based on our existing tooling, and with no competition. As soon as Jerry, Gary, or anybody else gets into the mix cost go up (not down!), and the economic viability of the concept goes out the window.

    Back when I was on the CRB Erik Skirmants and I used to discuss FE periodically, and one comment he made has stuck with me ever since: the year the Club set the price under $30k they sold 50+ cars. Then the price began climbing towards the cost of production, and every time the price went up the sales went down. I don't know what the total is any more, but it's barely above 100 cars sold, and last I checked the price was north of $50k (can't find a price on their website).
    There are a few nice FEs selling for low-mid 20s. Last I checked, the FEs were $37k brand new. There are around 40 FEs not being raced around the country (according to scca participation #s) so there are plenty of low-mid 20s cars available. Cendiv is where the action is at so if you like Road America, Gingerman, Black Hawk, etc... then FE is the only choice around right now that checks almost every box.
    I race communist race cars.

    "Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling, there are rules." - Walter Sobchak

  27. The following members LIKED this post:


  28. #101
    Senior Member SEComposites's Avatar
    Join Date
    08.15.08
    Location
    Hoschton, GA
    Posts
    1,394
    Liked: 757

    Default

    Why is FE then not in the Miata league of popularity?

    Ignore that comment! I don't want this thread to wander off into a class bashing affair!

  29. #102
    Contributing Member dsmithwc04's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.30.07
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,135
    Liked: 177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SEComposites View Post
    Why is FE then not in the Miata league of popularity?

    Ignore that comment! I don't want this thread to wander off into a class bashing affair!

    That's an honest question. One that I myself asked in the FE thread (although it was more of a bash fest from others rather than a constructive conversation.)

    Why has FE not become as popular in open wheel as SM has become in the tin top world? What does FE not have that we are exploring with this thread? What is any new class going to have that will bring more people

    I've heard people talk about the expensive spares, but the parts are quality and you have CSR's to help you at the track. Plus you don't have to carry spares since the CSR's sell them at the track if you need them. Not to mention Steve Stadel(cendiv CSR) has the One Formula series that actually PAYS MONEY to the top 6 positions in the series. I think 1st place got $3500 last year!

    Engines routinely last 4-5 seasons competitively, gearboxes are stout, the car looks good and goes fast. Dollar to value ratio is at least equal with the proposals I'm seeing in this thread if not cheaper.

    I hate to sound like a walking,talking FE billboard but why reinvent the wheel if there is already a class out there that checks so many of the boxes?
    I race communist race cars.

    "Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling, there are rules." - Walter Sobchak

  30. The following members LIKED this post:


  31. #103
    Contributing Member iamuwere's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.26.05
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    1,390
    Liked: 111

    Default Open Wheel Miata

    Spec Miata weekend I did at Summit Point was $1600 for the weekend rental including the extra test day, crew, tires (not new), and fuel. Add race entry for $400 or so and $60 fuel to get there from Cleveland and I was out just over $2000 total.

  32. #104
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SEComposites View Post
    Perhaps there is a reason there is an overall lack of interest? Perhaps what's out there is not that attractive to potential new racers.
    Access to tracks, parking lot racing (drifting) and street racing are "driving" people away from the tracks.....

    There was a documentary about Compton street racing a while ago
    (I think this is it)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iieD4i9-sGA

    These guys tried to go legit but returned to street racing because that is where they made their money and....

    Racing is a discipline - these guys have never lived with rules and many young people - not just residence of Compton - don't like rules.

    Last month I went to a Speed Ventures event with my son and his friends. Over 200 cars at ChuckWalla (another discussion), 6 run groups of 30-40 cars....

    It's not racing? Riiiiight. SV almost requires you rent a transponder (you're gridded at the back if you don't have one and you're gridded by time). At the end of every session they print out times and people car competing for the best times....
    A lot of real race cars (sans open wheel - except for 2 FMs - in the top group at the front).

    SCCA is trying to address this with their track night program which tells me they now know where the people have gone.

    So, SV is the Saturday night street racing reborn.
    "Run-what-you-brung" action.... no rules, minimal safety gear (seatbelt and helmet).

  33. #105
    Contributing Member iamuwere's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.26.05
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    1,390
    Liked: 111

    Default Open Wheel Miata

    Other than having to swap the transmission on the test day due to a bad third gear which is probably been damaged by the last renter, I'm not sure they turned a wrench on any of the other seven cars under the tent that weekend

  34. #106
    Contributing Member dsmithwc04's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.30.07
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,135
    Liked: 177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeerBudgetRacing View Post
    Access to tracks, parking lot racing (drifting) and street racing are "driving" people away from the tracks.....

    There was a documentary about Compton street racing a while ago
    (I think this is it)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iieD4i9-sGA

    These guys tried to go legit but returned to street racing because that is where they made their money and....

    Racing is a discipline - these guys have never lived with rules and many young people - not just residence of Compton - don't like rules.

    Last month I went to a Speed Ventures event with my son and his friends. Over 200 cars at ChuckWalla (another discussion), 6 run groups of 30-40 cars....

    It's not racing? Riiiiight. SV almost requires you rent a transponder (you're gridded at the back if you don't have one and you're gridded by time). At the end of every session they print out times and people car competing for the best times....
    A lot of real race cars (sans open wheel - except for 2 FMs - in the top group at the front).

    SCCA is trying to address this with their track night program which tells me they now know where the people have gone.

    So, SV is the Saturday night street racing reborn.
    "Run-what-you-brung" action.... no rules, minimal safety gear (seatbelt and helmet).
    I'm a younger guy and I've got friends that drive like idiots. One buddy has two 2004 Cobras pushing 480+hp at the wheels and his DD is a 2006 wrx sti pushing 330 at the wheels. He takes the most unnecessary risks on the street that provide zero rewards. Even worse, he thinks he is Michael Andretti and has never been in a real racecar nor has he ever driven on a race track. I don't get the street scene. If they all want to emulate Paul Walker then perhaps they can end up the same way he did.
    I race communist race cars.

    "Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling, there are rules." - Walter Sobchak

  35. The following 2 users liked this post:


  36. #107
    Contributing Member Earley Motorsports's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.03.10
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Posts
    1,467
    Liked: 432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SEComposites View Post
    Thanks chaps.
    I think we're on the same page. An issue with bike engined cars is the chain drive (there are options to eliminate this) and the perceived reliability issue (real or not) This car would have to do a minimum of two full seasons on a motor. Perhaps a rev limited bigger capacity bike engine like the Hayabusa.
    Perhaps I should just do it?
    How about a Yamaha VMax motor (first generation) 145HP, 90ft/lbs torque, 5 speed V4(narrow) 1200cc with a shaft drive. They take a hellava hammering (I know I have had one since 1985) and are cheap to buy. Great motor with loads of grunt. That in a formula ford style car would be a lot of fun. Sound really good unmuffled also.
    Graham

  37. The following members LIKED this post:


  38. #108
    Senior Member Spengo's Avatar
    Join Date
    02.23.12
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    239
    Liked: 121

    Default

    What about instead of making an entirely new class, make a car that's a subclass of an existing class? You know how in local FC races there's CFC for the older cars, they race at the same time in the same field and if they went to a Majors race they'd race as regular FC, but they're maybe a second or so slower a lap than a modern FC. Or like in the NWFC series they just run with a lower minimum weight.

    What about that same kind of idea but instead make it like a Super Spec FC. Spec chassis, spec tires, sealed shocks, sealed engine, all the good things about an FE but in a car that would race in FC or FF or some other existing class instead. Super Spec FC would race at the same time and in the same field as a regular FC even though it's maybe a second or so off the pace of a well-driven development FC. You could class it as a regular FC if you wanted or you could even buy fancy shocks and open up the engine yourself to just convert it to be used as a regular FC all the time.

  39. #109
    Classifieds Super License BeerBudgetRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    09.04.13
    Location
    Goleta, California
    Posts
    4,174
    Liked: 1261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsmithwc04 View Post
    Why has FE not become as popular in open wheel as SM has become in the tin top world? What does FE not have that we are exploring with this thread?
    To me its the sealed (FE) v. spec (SM) issue. <- Period.

    FE is a great car (especially for arrive and drive), but if I need new rings or something simple under the seal I can't do that myself.

    People keep talking about the "old days" and the size of the grids, but no one talks about WHO was on that grid.

    The core of racing used to be wrenchers. The arrive and drive with the Pro built engines made better cars within the rules, but the satisfaction level has declined.
    The wrencher is not as competitive and the arrive and drive guys have more money to continually up the ante. Everyone gets dissatisfied and moves on.....

    FE addressed arrive and drive and then the people moved on. Cars tend to go from arrive and drive owners to wrenchers - but they don't want them because they're sealed.

    The need to break the seal and open the market. SCCA won't because of their contracts.....

  40. The following members LIKED this post:


  41. #110
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iamuwere View Post
    Other than having to swap the transmission on the test day due to a bad third gear which is probably been damaged by the last renter, I'm not sure they turned a wrench on any of the other seven cars under the tent that weekend
    Jim, do they do things like fastener checks etc?
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  42. #111
    Contributing Member iamuwere's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.26.05
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    1,390
    Liked: 111

    Default

    Nope. I asked about that. They check front hubs periodically as they tend to be failure points. This was a good shop. They do that stuff as part of race prep, but at the track, that is just not a Miata thing to do. How often do you bolt check your street car?

    Watch the paddock. A Miata is only worked upon when it is crashed. Otherwise, I hardly ever seen any work done. I know, "but how can they not nut/bolt check everything?" It just doesn't seem to be a closed-wheel car thing to do, especially in classes that aren't stressed highly (T2-4, SM, IT-although many IT cars could scrap heaped as much as raced).

  43. #112
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    01.11.05
    Location
    Zionsville, Indiana
    Posts
    3,169
    Liked: 1397

    Default

    The no new class in SCCA is a valid argument. When I drew up my design, I intended that the car be a heads up car that could be combined into FF. That way no new class.

    The Idea of a detuned (restricted) 1000 cc bike engine might be a great idea to increase the longevity of the bike engines.

    As to the business: my thought was that manufacturers would have a large number of parts that would be interchangeable between any car in the class. An individual manufacture could choose to build every thing themselves or build just those parts that were unique to each car design. Over time, the common parts business would gravitate to the lowest cost producer. The manufacturers would profit mostly from the sales of their cars. The profit in the car business is not in building cars but in keeping those cars on the track with spares such as suspension arms and body parts.

    I think that if the car design is not too far from current FF, many cars could be built from FF tooling or salvaged cars. This would go a long way to keeping costs low. My particular design used many parts from my current cars.

    When I check my design to a Zink Z10, the car was almost the same size. Track was very close and wheel base a bit longer. In short the CF from that era are smaller than current FFs.

  44. #113
    Contributing Member problemchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.22.02
    Location
    Ransomville, NY
    Posts
    5,729
    Liked: 4346

    Default

    As has been pointed out above, this is a people problem not a product problem. Right now, you can get excellent used car value in the purchase of a F600, FF (kent or Honda), FC, FE, FM, FB ....... cars from $10K-$40K. Many people reading this right now could be jumping in to these cars. They're not. We're not. And we are the "converted".

    In old days you ran FV, FF, or FA. Now you have 27 different open wheel and 100+ closed wheel classes in many different organizations to choose from. If there are 50 people reading this now, you will not find 5 that would agree on any ideal choice. This magic formula to bring new people into a "magic formula car" cannot exist, certainly in any democratic process. Our community, like society in general, is just too fragmented and diverse to embrace an affordable formula car for the masses.
    Greg Rice, RICERACEPREP.com
    F1600 Arrive-N-Drive for FRP and SCCA, FC SCCA also. Including Runoffs
    2020 & 2022 F1600 Champion, 2020 SCCA FF Champion, 2021 SCCA FC Champion,
    2016 F2000 Champion, Follow RiceRacePrep on Instagram.

  45. The following 3 users liked this post:


  46. #114
    Contributing Member dsmithwc04's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.30.07
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,135
    Liked: 177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by problemchild View Post
    As has been pointed out above, this is a people problem not a product problem. Right now, you can get excellent used car value in the purchase of a F600, FF (kent or Honda), FC, FE, FM, FB ....... cars from $10K-$40K. Many people reading this right now could be jumping in to these cars. They're not. We're not. And we are the "converted".

    In old days you ran FV, FF, or FA. Now you have 27 different open wheel and 100+ closed wheel classes in many different organizations to choose from. If there are 50 people reading this now, you will not find 5 that would agree on any ideal choice. This magic formula to bring new people into a "magic formula car" cannot exist, certainly in any democratic process. Our community, like society in general, is just too fragmented and diverse to embrace an affordable formula car for the masses.
    Hit the nail on the head.
    I race communist race cars.

    "Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling, there are rules." - Walter Sobchak

  47. #115
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by problemchild View Post
    As has been pointed out above, this is a people problem not a product problem. Right now, you can get excellent used car value in the purchase of a F600, FF (kent or Honda), FC, FE, FM, FB ....... cars from $10K-$40K. Many people reading this right now could be jumping in to these cars. They're not. We're not. And we are the "converted".

    In old days you ran FV, FF, or FA. Now you have 27 different open wheel and 100+ closed wheel classes in many different organizations to choose from. If there are 50 people reading this now, you will not find 5 that would agree on any ideal choice. This magic formula to bring new people into a "magic formula car" cannot exist, certainly in any democratic process. Our community, like society in general, is just too fragmented and diverse to embrace an affordable formula car for the masses.

    You may be right. I was planning on building a new car for myself but I think that I will build a prototype of this car and use it instead. I can still drive it in a couple of classes and have fun and it will not cost me any more than a new Blade but I am sure it will be a lot faster. I Will let you know how it goes.
    Last edited by Jnovak; 12.28.15 at 7:18 PM.
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

  48. #116
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    01.11.05
    Location
    Zionsville, Indiana
    Posts
    3,169
    Liked: 1397

    Default

    For you guys and gals with very good imaginations might get an idea from this rendering of what Jay's car could possibly resemble.

    This is as far as I got with the design.

  49. The following members LIKED this post:


  50. #117
    Senior Member SStadel's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.20.02
    Location
    Scales Mound IL
    Posts
    1,271
    Liked: 218

    Default

    Jay and Dan beat me to it, but Greg's answer made me laugh out loud (because its so true!). Then I went back and reread the first post. The main problem with the very first post is that he doesn't list the boxes that he wanted to check off. Perhaps had he done that we could have all pointed to one (or two) classes that would have checked his boxes. Maybe not. Dan has been very passionate about why he likes FE and he's bewildered why more don't. Beer Budget summed up his reason - sealed versus spec - deal breaker. Maybe for SEC that isn't, but the variables out there are too many.

    Obviously, as a CSR for FE, I would/should be pumping FE and I do to a point, but not so much on ApexSpeed. I know the open wheel community having been around it for almost 30 years. There's a lot of tinkerers out there. I would never claim to be any sort of engineer and when FE (nee FSCCA) came out, I jumped on it. Next year will be my 16th in the class. I believe it is the closest regulated spec class out there. The engines are comparable after years of use. If it doesn't check all of your boxes, so be it.

    One statement that I believe to be true with FE that is not with SM. You can buy nearly any FE in the country and with the right driver (as long as his name is Scott) win the National Championship. I dare say that it would cost you more to buy that National Championship SM than the FE.

    If you take Scott's name off of the finishing order in FE, you're going to see a long and diversified list of race drivers that have finished in the top 5 or 6 in FE from our first championship until now.

    FE had the highest participation of any winged formula car in 2015. With the expected increase in the Northern Conference and Southeast Conference fields in 2016 I expect our participation to be a runaway from other winged formula car participation in 2016.

    You can (and will ) argue that its still not the SM of formula cars, but in my opinion you have to put a multiplier on whatever an SM costs to purchase and run to compare it to the performance and feeling of driving a formula car.
    Competition One Racing
    racer6@mchsi.com

  51. The following 2 users liked this post:


  52. #118
    Contributing Member Steve Demeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.01.01
    Location
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
    Posts
    6,355
    Liked: 909

    Default

    But who cares what the car looks like once you are in the seat?

    Can't tell from there.

    But the racing is just as good as with a pretty car.

    Quote Originally Posted by SEComposites View Post
    A good point. No offense intended to any SRF racers but they are pretty hideous machines to look at. Yes they have reasonable grids but I see that fact as being inspite of the car. The basic recipe is sound though. Rugged reliable and cheap (ish). I don't want to race a closed wheel car though, that's my problem!

  53. #119
    Contributing Member iamuwere's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.26.05
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    1,390
    Liked: 111

    Default Open Wheel Miata

    I can't say I love the looks, but it didn't stop me from buying one.

  54. #120
    Contributing Member Jnovak's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.08.07
    Location
    Dearborn, Michigan
    Posts
    3,787
    Liked: 896

    Default

    Brian and I were in FE for a couple of years and we had a lot of reliability issues with the transaxle that have now been fixed. At that time it was a deal breaker for us. We had several other more minor issues that I have heard are now fixed.

    We talked about getting back in FE a little more than a year ago and then the FA deal came our way.

    I am really surprised that some drivers who are rockets in other classes cannot make an FE go.

    Just a side note Steve, wasup with that?
    Thanks ... Jay Novak
    313-445-4047
    On my 54th year as an SCCA member
    with a special thanks to every SCCA worker (NONE OF US WOULD RACE WITHOUT THE WORKERS)

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social