Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 281 to 300 of 300
  1. #281
    Senior Member crypt0zink's Avatar
    Join Date
    05.11.12
    Location
    Guilford, CT
    Posts
    111
    Liked: 24

    Default

    Is there a reason don't FV & FST run together more often?
    John Kennelly
    Radiant Racing Tech - Apex Pro Dealer
    Facebook | YouTube

  2. #282
    Senior Member Diamond Level Motorsports's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.16.10
    Location
    Shelbyville, TN
    Posts
    450
    Liked: 93

    Default

    I think running the classes together is a great idea, however, I guaranty there will be issues with slow FST's getting the the way of fast FV's and slow FV's getting in the way of fast FST's Probably a split start would be beneficial.

    We (FV's) currently have problems CF's getting in the way of the FV's along with FC's lapping us twice in one 25 min race. If the car counts keep falling then we will also be looking in our mirrors for FM's, FA, and who knows what else.

    There is no perfect answer. I still feel that it is in the best interest of both classes to try and work together.
    Scott

  3. #283
    Contributing Member sracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.03.01
    Location
    Lexington KY
    Posts
    1,000
    Liked: 50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Davis View Post
    How about some input from other potential attendees. Would you support a "single class race group" that really has TWO classes in it? I think for an effort like this, WDCR would EXPECT at least 25 cars per group. I doubt FST could do that. FV, OTOH, probably could .. unless we allow FST to run with us - then I'm not sure if we would lose FV's as a result of that?
    This of course would be a "Regional". As far as FV running in a group with 2 classes, you do it all the time. More often with 3 or 4 classes. No change there. However if you were to run at one of the FST/FFDA Series races and brought in 8 or 10 cars, (FST always has 10 or more there), we would have a group of 20 cars. No Regional registrar wants to turn that away and will go along way towards making us the group we want.

    Either way, IMO you would have to look at 2 specific classes in 1 race. No one will every remember the winner of the "B" series. You would need a FST 1,2,3 and FV 1,2,3,
    Huh? You (FV) run with FF, F500, and others now. The only difference is you would likely now ONLY run with FST. Beside who "remembers" the winners of any fv or fst race beyond the next weekend.

    Even with our (FST) turnouts of only 10-15 cars, Robert Guhde is able to negotiate some very nice deals with the race officials. (group number, classes in group, etc.) There is lots of power in numbers..

    IMO, this is the way to keep us FV and FST going strong. With 15 or 20 car fields race chairs are not going to want to schedule too many fender only events.

    The problem is (again IMO), FV has no one that speaks for the group or can bring any consensus to the drivers. The above can't happen without it.
    Jim
    859-252-2349 or
    859-339-7425
    http://www.sracing.com

  4. #284
    Contributing Member sracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.03.01
    Location
    Lexington KY
    Posts
    1,000
    Liked: 50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crypt0zink View Post
    Is there a reason don't FV & FST run together more often?
    We almost ALWAYS run together. We have done it for 10+ years. We have had very few if any real issues. We have run both with split starts and normal starts. We would MUCH rather run with the Vees than the FFs. Slow FF's often affect our races..

    .
    Jim
    859-252-2349 or
    859-339-7425
    http://www.sracing.com

  5. #285
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    10.15.14
    Location
    Waterdown
    Posts
    149
    Liked: 51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bam Bam View Post
    I was wondering the number of classes and thought perhaps that was part of it. I know they have FF for sure, just not sure of the number of other open wheel classes. The number of available classes to race in will surely help if there are less choices.
    Way too many choices in North America that's diluting the fields as someone said. Just got this flyer from SCCA...30 classes in road racing.
    Last edited by Johan W; 12.05.14 at 7:14 PM.

  6. The following members LIKED this post:


  7. #286
    Contributing Member Steve Bamford's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.16.10
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,305
    Liked: 619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johan W View Post
    Way too many choices in North America that's diluting the fields as someone said. Just got this flyer...30 classes in road racing.
    So to answer Noel's question as the title of this thread asks, we need to eliminate a good number of classes to increase overall participation? I doubt it will happen but I think that would help.
    Last edited by Steve Bamford; 12.06.14 at 9:46 AM.
    Steve Bamford

  8. The following 2 users liked this post:


  9. #287
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    11.16.08
    Location
    Brantford
    Posts
    294
    Liked: 22

    Default

    You are both right; too many classes, 30 in total, 25 (I think) at the Run-Offs. I thought that the Majors program was supposed to rationalize this, but this doesn’t seem to have happened. Some classes at the 2013 Run-Offs started less than 10 cars, but they have big motor-homes, so that’s all right.

    In North America it seems that you can turn up with a bastardised something-or-other and they will find a class for you, hence Greg’s Formula Alphabet. Look at Formula Libra is Canada, no one is really racing, just a bunch of mismatched cars, lapping. Elsewhere there are specific classes, so bring a car that complies with one of them or stay at home. If a class cannot sustain it’s numbers its killed off.

  10. #288
    Senior Member mikehinkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.02.14
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    218
    Liked: 67

    Default

    I agree with this line of thinking!!!!!!
    Why are there so many classes? condense it down to 10 classes or less. More cars on the track is more fun for the spectators and the racers. Race days would get over faster and possibly be cheaper or at least it would allow for more track time.
    This is a problem with the SCCA that forum talk is not going to solve
    I've always thought this was a major problem with road racing since the first time I ever watched a SCCA event. I could not figure out why there were 3-4 winners in a group of 15 cars lol

  11. #289
    Senior Member Brian C in Az's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.31.13
    Location
    Apache Junction, Az
    Posts
    523
    Liked: 102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sracing View Post
    There is lots of power in numbers..

    IMO, this is the way to keep us FV and FST going strong. With 15 or 20 car fields race chairs are not going to want to schedule too many fender only events.

    The problem is (again IMO), FV has no one that speaks for the group or can bring any consensus to the drivers. The above can't happen without it.
    Why don't you become the voice for the group. You have a very good grasp of the situation and you make a good argument.

    Quote Originally Posted by sracing View Post
    We almost ALWAYS run together. We have done it for 10+ years. We have had very few if any real issues. We have run both with split starts and normal starts. We would MUCH rather run with the Vees than the FFs. Slow FF's often affect our races...
    What is the difference if a slow FF is in the race vs a lapped FV. Either way, it is the same obstacle with whom the leading drivers have to contend.

    We mix FM (1 to 4 cars), FF (12 to 24 cars), FC ( 1 or 2 cars) FV (1 or 2 cars), FST (1 car) and DSR (1 to 3 cars).

    We all deal with the same issues. Make room for the fast FM's and get around the FST

  12. #290
    Senior Member Diamond Level Motorsports's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.16.10
    Location
    Shelbyville, TN
    Posts
    450
    Liked: 93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian C in Az View Post


    What is the difference if a slow FF is in the race vs a lapped FV. Either way, it is the same obstacle with whom the leading drivers have to contend.

    We mix FM (1 to 4 cars), FF (12 to 24 cars), FC ( 1 or 2 cars) FV (1 or 2 cars), FST (1 car) and DSR (1 to 3 cars).

    We all deal with the same issues. Make room for the fast FM's and get around the FST
    There are two issues. The first is the much faster cars approaching at much higher speeds. This is unsafe and has driven at least 3 fellow competitors into either switching to different run groups (AKA SRF) Or quiting altogether.

    The other problem, which is worse IMO, is the slow CF (or whatever class) guy that is so slow in the corners yet so fast down the straight it ruins the entire race for the FV's. Now of course the slow CF guy is so slow that he is driving all by himself. His competitors are gone. So instead of pulling out of the way of the FV battle, he decides that he is going to race with the FV's. This is the problem! If he would just move over and let the FV race continue it would be all good, however, it never seems to be this way. There is a guy in our region that has had multiple protest filed against him this year but SCCA does nothing.......That's the real problem........ So the frustrated FV guys either find another venue, class, group, etc, to race with.
    Scott

  13. The following members LIKED this post:


  14. #291
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    11.16.08
    Location
    Brantford
    Posts
    294
    Liked: 22

    Default

    A lone FF decided he would dick around in front of an 18-car FV field during the last National at Nelson Ledges, until a notable FV driver did us all a favour and punted him off. When the FF driver complained about his broken car, he was told that he must understand, drum brakes aren’t as good as discs and the said FV driver then pointed out that he had plenty of spare noses if he should have further brake problems.

    I encountered the same FF driver later in the season, again running on his own. This time he ran his race behind the Vees and collected his win.

  15. #292
    Senior Member Amon's Avatar
    Join Date
    10.07.02
    Location
    Medina, Ohio
    Posts
    1,520
    Liked: 174

    Default

    Guy,

    I believe it was Charlie Rodgers and myself who blocked a certain female CF driver from passing us down the back straight of Mid-Ohio, by hogging the entire track to prevent her from passing us and holding us up in the corners. Sometimes you have to do things you wish you hadn't but when the SCCA fails to do it's job, the drivers must step-in...Our ruse worked and we never saw her again for the entire race!

    About a year later we both got into each other with our cars and she finally saw the light and retired from racing! I had nearly a half-dozen drivers come over and thank me for helping in her decision to retire.

    Mark

    88' Citation 002'

  16. #293
    Contributing Member sracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.03.01
    Location
    Lexington KY
    Posts
    1,000
    Liked: 50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian C in Az View Post
    Why don't you become the voice for the group. You have a very good grasp of the situation and you make a good argument.
    No thanks. I (nor anyone I know) could draw any consensus in the FV group. (Pretty obvious in this and other threads) (a shame)

    What is the difference if a slow FF is in the race vs a lapped FV. Either way, it is the same obstacle with whom the leading drivers have to contend.
    See Diamond Formula Cars answer. That pretty much covers it. BTW, MOST of the time the CFC, FF, etc. driver is not to blame. He is just trying to learn and race like we all did. It is just the speed discrepancy (straights vs. corners) that hurt the FV's As he and Mark pointed out there ARE some CFC, etc. drivers that just don't get it and have to be talked to.
    Jim
    859-252-2349 or
    859-339-7425
    http://www.sracing.com

  17. #294
    Senior Member Diamond Level Motorsports's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.16.10
    Location
    Shelbyville, TN
    Posts
    450
    Liked: 93

    Default

    https://vimeo.com/111712654

    This video is an example of what I am talking about.

    This was my first time in this car and I was the only one in my class so I didn't get overly concerned about getting by this CF. If it was an actual race and I was battling with another FST things would have been different. I did eventually passed him later in the race and went on to turn a faster time.

    After the race he came over to me and was very excited that we had this great race. Well, he has +20 more HP then me. We are not in the same class, it was not a race. This is the same guy that has been protested several times this year. I am all for him participating, God knows we need the entry's. I just want him to be respectful of the other classes that are on the track and get out of the way so you are not effecting someone else race.
    Scott

  18. #295
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    12.24.08
    Location
    Cedarburg, WI
    Posts
    1,950
    Liked: 86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikehinkle View Post
    I agree with this line of thinking!!!!!!
    Why are there so many classes? condense it down to 10 classes or less. More cars on the track is more fun for the spectators and the racers. Race days would get over faster and possibly be cheaper or at least it would allow for more track time.
    This is a problem with the SCCA that forum talk is not going to solve
    The problem is that there are enough other groups to race with that if the SCCA did that, the odds are greater those drivers would just leave and reduce the number of members and entries, not sell their car and move to a different SCCA class. This is America, and just like Burger King, we want it Our Way.
    Matt King
    FV19 Citation XTC-41
    CenDiv-Milwaukee
    KEEP THE KINK!

  19. #296
    Senior Member Rolling Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.06.11
    Location
    Carleton Place,ONT
    Posts
    718
    Liked: 36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G.B. View Post
    A lone FF decided he would dick around in front of an 18-car FV field during the last National at Nelson Ledges, until a notable FV driver did us all a favour and punted him off. When the FF driver complained about his broken car, he was told that he must understand, drum brakes aren’t as good as discs and the said FV driver then pointed out that he had plenty of spare noses if he should have further brake problems.

    I encountered the same FF driver later in the season, again running on his own. This time he ran his race behind the Vees and collected his win.
    Any driver who punted me off would get a kick in the head afterwards..been a different story if "SAID" FV driver injured or worse killed the other driver wouldnt it!!!!!!TOTALLY IRRISPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR.All you had to do was get 18 drivers to go and tell the FF driver keep out of our way and dont block us etc or you will see us ALL ''after'' the race....NOT I repeat NOT during the race.

  20. #297
    Senior Member Rolling Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.06.11
    Location
    Carleton Place,ONT
    Posts
    718
    Liked: 36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amon View Post
    Guy,

    I believe it was Charlie Rodgers and myself who blocked a certain female CF driver from passing us down the back straight of Mid-Ohio, by hogging the entire track to prevent her from passing us and holding us up in the corners. Sometimes you have to do things you wish you hadn't but when the SCCA fails to do it's job, the drivers must step-in...Our ruse worked and we never saw her again for the entire race!

    About a year later we both got into each other with our cars and she finally saw the light and retired from racing! I had nearly a half-dozen drivers come over and thank me for helping in her decision to retire.

    Mark

    88' Citation 002'
    Hope you are both proud of yourselves,very classy behaviour in the dangerous sport of motor racing....was it because it was a female driver maybe?or jus because the person wasnt super fast top drivers like you two

  21. #298
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    10.29.12
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    486
    Liked: 247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rolling Stone View Post
    Hope you are both proud of yourselves,very classy behaviour in the dangerous sport of motor racing....was it because it was a female driver maybe?or jus because the person wasnt super fast top drivers like you two
    It was because she ruined countless races over the years and was dangerous in that she blocked and held everyone up. My father got airborne over her at Mid Ohio endangering his life and the others behind him because she broke on the front straight when the green flag flew. Some people have no business behind the wheel of a race car.

    Before you judge so quickly you should actually understand the situation, it sounds like you've never had a faster class car hold you up. I have no respect for a driver that is in a faster classes that tries to race those who are in a different class. They have the right to be out there but not to ruin my race and split the pack up. It sounds like you haven't run up front which is why you have no credibility or experience with this......

  22. #299
    Contributing Member sracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.03.01
    Location
    Lexington KY
    Posts
    1,000
    Liked: 50

    Default

    I gotta defend some folks here I don't think any of the above would risk life, limb or car purposely to teach the lady a lesson. I suspect an incident happened and they got the best of it. Thus winning the approval of the other drivers. I doubt that anyone who raced a lot at Mid-O or IRP (ORP) DIDN"T have or almost have an incident with this particular driver. Her typical times at Mid-O were 1:46+ in a very well prepped FF ! (Mid Pack Regional FV times) She was talked to many times by drivers and I know at least twice by stewards. She "removed" me from a one race and often screwed up any first lap she was in. (Typically qualifying mid pack in Vees and on the green getting to the corner first, only to stop with all the Vees behind her. As pointed out above, she had no Fords to race with so she raced the Vees.

    BTW, I raced Mark many times and he was not one to do anything dangerous on the track. I have never heard anything negative about Charlie either.
    Jim
    859-252-2349 or
    859-339-7425
    http://www.sracing.com

  23. #300
    Global Moderator Chris Robson's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.19.02
    Location
    Hebron, CT
    Posts
    524
    Liked: 113

    Default

    Guys this thread has run it's course, and then some. Time to move on... This thread has been closed.

    Chris
    Chris Robson
    Accelerated Performance Coaching
    http://APCDriving.com

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social