Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 92 of 92
  1. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,288
    Liked: 1880

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 85 SWIFT DB1 View Post
    I'm looking for a slower deceleration more than any physical protection.... Michael
    You won't get any slower deceleration via the nose box without making it any longer - the effective crush space ends at the leading edge of the MC, and once you hit them, all bets are off as to how far the frame will collapse into your legs. You are deluding yourself if you think that the MCs will do a better job of protecting you at that point than a bulkhead that spreads the load.

    Quote from Dr John Melvin (GM safety expert) : " The driver can survive incredible g-loads, assuming that the safety cell is not breached. Once it is breached, all bets are off."

  2. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    09.11.02
    Location
    Tatamagouche, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    2,868
    Liked: 123

    Default

    I am reading this discussion and relating it to an RF85 that we have - very similar at the front of the chassis to a DB1. Would you say that constructing the additional forward bulkhead in front of the master cylinders, tying that back into the main chassis rails, and then constructing a new nose crushbox forward of that extending the nose bodywork as appropriate, thinking of a 15" or so aluminium box type crush structure hidden inside the bodywork as an example, would be a useful route to take? or making the additional forward bulkhead a mounting point for a composite crush structure/body piece nose like the more modern cars have?

    Thanks,

  3. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,288
    Liked: 1880

    Default

    Either will work. The current British rules use the additional bulkhead as the mount for the box. The box is an aluminium structure filled with alu honeycomb laid on its side (cells oriented fore/aft).

  4. #84
    Grand Pooh Bah Purple Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.03.01
    Location
    Havana, Fl, USA
    Posts
    10,777
    Liked: 3787

    Default

    The front crush box on the new Mygale that ran with the F1600CS a week ago seemed much more adequate than those Al boxes I'm used to seeing. Liberal use of AL honeycomb. Sorry, i didn't take any pictures.


  5. #85
    Contributing Member swiftdrivr's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.13.07
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,341
    Liked: 678

    Default weird thoughts in my head

    Here is an idea. Maybe someone with an engineering background can tell me if this would work. Seems pretty low-tech, works from multiple angles, should be cheap to make. Unfortunately, it brings to mind the old saying:, "for every problem there is a solution that is simple, elegant, and wrong."---Jim
    Last edited by swiftdrivr; 12.08.12 at 2:45 PM.

  6. #86
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,288
    Liked: 1880

    Default

    Close to useless, unfortunately, but better than nothing.

  7. #87
    Contributing Member Art Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.03.03
    Location
    Ridgecrest, Ca
    Posts
    1,400
    Liked: 259

    Default

    Richard-

    what are your thoughts on sheet thickness, material thickness, and cell size for the US FFord environment? is a foot of honeycomb in the direction of travel enough/material/better/...............? any ideas on where the knee in the curve is for length in the direction of travel since "more" will always be "better" ?? is aluminum honeycomb the attenuation leader on a per pound basis?

    Art
    artesmith@earthlink.net

  8. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    08.18.02
    Location
    Indy, IN
    Posts
    6,288
    Liked: 1880

    Default

    The answer is "it depends.......", so it is probably best that I just e-mail you the Cranfield University report - very good numbers in there.

    Remember though, when reading the report, that the criterial was a steady 25 g max deceleration - no initial or ending spikes - plus it had to pass push-off tests. If spikes are allowable, the driver can easily handle 80g's (and higher) or a few milliseconds (20-50 or so), and the construction can be different.

  9. #89
    Contributing Member Phil Wellner's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.20.07
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    95
    Liked: 6

    Default

    I'm considering fabricating a new front crush structure for my DB-1 based on some of the suggestions in this thread. Part of the project would be moving the master cylinders behind the front bulkhead so that the crush structure could be completely filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam. Does anyone have any suggestions about which grade of aluminum sheet would be best for the box? I'm planning to form the box from 2-3 pieces of Al sheet and rivet it together, so I'd need a grade that can be formed but still has good strength. Would 6061 work?

    Thanks,
    Phil
    Phil Wellner
    1984 Swift DB-1 #49
    www.formulaford.us

  10. #90
    Contributing Member swiftdrivr's Avatar
    Join Date
    06.13.07
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,341
    Liked: 678

    Default masters behind bulkhead

    Just curious: I can barely get my feet behind the bulkhead. How are you going to move the master cylinders back there?---Jim

  11. #91
    Contributing Member Phil Wellner's Avatar
    Join Date
    07.20.07
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    95
    Liked: 6

    Default

    With the pedals in the farthest back position, and with about 1-2" of bead seat between my lower back and the fuel cell, I still have to stretch to push the clutch pedal all the way down. I'm 5' 9", so I guess my legs are on the shorter side? For what it's worth, I'm planning to use compact master cylinders, which will hopefully save some room. Ideally, the pedals will be about 3-4" futher back than they are now.
    Phil Wellner
    1984 Swift DB-1 #49
    www.formulaford.us

  12. #92
    Member
    Join Date
    10.09.10
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    89
    Liked: 0

    Default Still looking for a nose box

    Hello, anyone have a DB1 nose box to sell new or spare?


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social