Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default This is the formula 500 4link

    This is the new and improved four link which can support all the new torqued coming out of that 2006 cbr1000rr motor. We still need to get a new axle cut for the car. The axle is going to be 60". I also need to order the new wheels. rear is going to be 13*10 the front is going to be 13*8.


    Thanks to everyone that has supported me through this build so far.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    08.28.05
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    76
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Chris, I have a similar project I'm working on, the F500 with a CBR600rr motor. Kinda stalled at the moment...
    I'm also in NY, near NYC, what about you???

    Chris R.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ny_racer_xxx View Post
    Chris, I have a similar project I'm working on, the F500 with a CBR600rr motor. Kinda stalled at the moment...
    I'm also in NY, near NYC, what about you???

    Chris R.

    Hi Chris, I live in Rochester NY. What have you done to the 500? I am very happy to hear that there is some one doing a 500. What make and year is the 500?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    04.17.07
    Location
    Pinellas Park, Fl.
    Posts
    201
    Liked: 0

    Default

    wow, moving right along and making good progress. How are you going to do the rear brakes? Just one for the axle, or one for each wheel? I am doing one big one right on the diff where the ring gear (now sprocket) used to be.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cparsons View Post
    wow, moving right along and making good progress. How are you going to do the rear brakes? Just one for the axle, or one for each wheel? I am doing one big one right on the diff where the ring gear (now sprocket) used to be.
    I am putting on 2 brakes on the. I still have a lot more work ahead of me. I will post more pics in about two weeks. What are you building.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    08.28.05
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    76
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Rochester, snow belt wow!!!! I live in Ossining.
    The car is a KBS MkV 1991 I believe, I haven't looked at the books lately. The car was a basket case, so all the work so far was repair. The rear clip I lopped off, I had modified the original, but I kept doing repairs on it, so I removed it. The chassis had a Quadrini 4 link put in. I'm keeping the straight axle in and the jackshaft. I have to come off the motor with an extended shaft to clear the cases, then forward to the jackshaft. With a straight axle, you shouldn't need more than a single brake. Why add more rotating mass to the drive train? I think a single rotor on diff is an excellent idea.

    CR
    Last edited by ny_racer_xxx; 12.04.07 at 9:06 PM. Reason: adding pic

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ny_racer_xxx View Post
    Rochester, snow belt wow!!!! I live in Ossining.
    The car is a KBS MkV 1991 I believe, I haven't looked at the books lately. The car was a basket case, so all the work so far was repair. The rear clip I lopped off, I had modified the original, but I kept doing repairs on it, so I removed it. The chassis had a Quadrini 4 link put in. I'm keeping the straight axle in and the jackshaft. I have to come off the motor with an extended shaft to clear the cases, then forward to the jackshaft. With a straight axle, you shouldn't need more than a single brake. Why add more rotating mass to the drive train? I think a single rotor on diff is an excellent idea.

    CR
    I am not using a diff I am using a live axle. I am using the two brakes because of all the new HP the the 2 stroke did not have. There is a lot more mass to stop now that there more weight. I think I will need the other brake plus the rotors are small on the car.

    So you are making an F600?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    08.28.05
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    76
    Liked: 0

    Default

    One thing to think about is that there's little or no engine braking on a 2 stroke, especially one with a centrifical clutch. Also, if you want to increase breaking, I would add more tire all around and bigger rotors to the front end, the rear is in the air mostly during hard braking. If you must add more clamping to the rear, try using 2 calipers to a single rotor on the rear.

    Hope this helps....

    CR

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    06.21.06
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4
    Liked: 0

    Default Axle Support?

    Chris,

    A long time ago, while working on a FSAE project, we needed to get a previous car running to get seat time. The previous car had gotten it's diff cannibalized so we came up with a straight section of 0.250" wall 1.25" axle tube to replace the whole thing. The setup was similar to yours but with much more favorable dimensions and no axle movement relative to the countersprocket. I believe the axle was about 18 inches in length with the sprocket mounted slightly off center in line with the countersprocket. This position had it abouth 6 to 8 inches inboard of the nearest bearing support. In short order, the engine torque bent the axle section.

    This was a car with an anemic, first generation GSX 600 engine and very hard rear tires. I'm sure that your newer engine will have twice as much torque than that one and your tires will have better traction. There's a very good reason why these F500 cars have their drive so close to the birdcages.

    I hope this helps with your design.

    Ramon
    Last edited by TestDriver; 12.05.07 at 2:40 PM. Reason: typo

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    12.03.07
    Location
    Sarnia On., Can
    Posts
    9
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TestDriver View Post
    the engine torque bent the axle section.
    I've got an f500/600 conversion going on too.

    This is not the first time I've heard of axles getting bent by the added torque. There is a fellow by the name of Brian Pimm who has put a 1300 Hyabusa in an f500 and he has this problem too.

    Seriously, I can see where it would be a problem even with a 600cc. The whole drive axle thing is something I change my mind about every other day. One day, I want to stay live axle, the next I want to do IRS just because it is simpler and neater to design and build.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Stan Clayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    11.14.03
    Location
    Mooresville NC area
    Posts
    4,157
    Liked: 309

    Default

    Remember that a cylinder's stiffness is proportional to the 4th power of its outside diameter. The equation for a tube is D^4 - d^4, where D is outside diameter and d is inside diameter.

    A 1.25" tubular axle's stiffness for a given material and length is therefore (using a .125" wall thickness):

    1.25^4 - 1.0^4 = 1.44, while a 2" axle with the same 1/8th inch wall thickness is...

    2^4 - 1.75^4 = 6.62, or over 4 1/2 times stronger.

    Google on "minisprint axle" for lots of sources.

    Have fun! Stan
    Stan Clayton
    Stohr Cars

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    Not only engine torque, but hitting curbs with the wheels as well.

    Even 25-30HP kart guys went from 1 1/4" x .250 4130 axles common 15 years ago to 50mm (2" THIN wall axles)

    Some good info here:http://www.bactechnologies.com/kart_axles_40mm.htm (karting carbon fiber axles)

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    08.28.05
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    76
    Liked: 0

    Default


    I don't know if this helps, but the QRE 4 link uses a 1 1/4 axle inside a tube with a bearing on either end, plus a 3rd bearing supporting next to the sprocket. This is teh setup I'm going with, but I'm going to flip flop the brake and the drive side.

    CR

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    08.28.05
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    76
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quickshoe, sorry but you're confusing a couple of points. Karter's went larger for lighter/stiffer axles, not stronger axles. I'll take a 40mm axle over a 50mm any day, the 50's are way to fragile. We had a big discussion on axles on the F500 page. There's how stiff and axle is, as in how it resists deflection, and how strong an axle is, as in what it takes to deform, or bend so it won't come back to straight. You can't put a sprocket in the middle of an axle without a support bearing and drive it. It will bend.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    12.03.07
    Location
    Sarnia On., Can
    Posts
    9
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickshoe View Post
    Some good info here:http://www.bactechnologies.com/kart_axles_40mm.htm (karting carbon fiber axles)

    I can use some of that weight reduction. For giggles I put my entire rear axle assembly on the bathroom scales. It came in at a staggering 88lbs!

    BTW, hello to Chris R. It's John from eformulacarnews.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TestDriver View Post
    Chris,

    A long time ago, while working on a FSAE project, we needed to get a previous car running to get seat time. The previous car had gotten it's diff cannibalized so we came up with a straight section of 0.250" wall 1.25" axle tube to replace the whole thing. The setup was similar to yours but with much more favorable dimensions and no axle movement relative to the countersprocket. I believe the axle was about 18 inches in length with the sprocket mounted slightly off center in line with the countersprocket. This position had it abouth 6 to 8 inches inboard of the nearest bearing support. In short order, the engine torque bent the axle section.

    This was a car with an anemic, first generation GSX 600 engine and very hard rear tires. I'm sure that your newer engine will have twice as much torque than that one and your tires will have better traction. There's a very good reason why these F500 cars have their drive so close to the birdcages.

    I hope this helps with your design.

    Ramon
    What was the axle made out of that you used on the SAE car? thanks

  17. #17
    Classifieds Super License samiam520's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.29.07
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    101
    Liked: 0

    Default F500 to F1000

    Man....................... you are a braver man then me. That thing looks way under designed for the type of speeds that you will be seeing.

    I admire your spirit, however, some one needs to stop you.
    Scott

    2006 Crusader FV & 2010 DFC10 FST

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    06.21.06
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4
    Liked: 0

    Default Axle Material

    Chris,

    I don't remember what it was made of. It was given to us by one of the team members from his karting stash. The bend happened too easily though as in the first or second hard launch from a stop. If it was 1018 or 1020 and we had replaced it with 4130, I'm sure we would have seen the same outcome if not as quickly.

    Quote Originally Posted by outlawzracing View Post
    What was the axle made out of that you used on the SAE car? thanks

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TestDriver View Post
    Chris,

    A long time ago, while working on a FSAE project, we needed to get a previous car running to get seat time. The previous car had gotten it's diff cannibalized so we came up with a straight section of 0.250" wall 1.25" axle tube to replace the whole thing. The setup was similar to yours but with much more favorable dimensions and no axle movement relative to the countersprocket. I believe the axle was about 18 inches in length with the sprocket mounted slightly off center in line with the countersprocket. This position had it abouth 6 to 8 inches inboard of the nearest bearing support. In short order, the engine torque bent the axle section.

    This was a car with an anemic, first generation GSX 600 engine and very hard rear tires. I'm sure that your newer engine will have twice as much torque than that one and your tires will have better traction. There's a very good reason why these F500 cars have their drive so close to the birdcages.

    I hope this helps with your design.

    Ramon
    This is good news that you brought to me. I will through an axle bearing carrier. I think if I put one in the center of the car that would work. thanks again for you help

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samiam520 View Post
    Man....................... you are a braver man then me. That thing looks way under designed for the type of speeds that you will be seeing.

    I admire your spirit, however, some one needs to stop you.

    I am still working on building of the rear end. I will post more pics when I get more done.

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    not many (none???) karting axles are mild steel. Their flavors are generally 4130, Ti, or 6061, and apparently some CF out there too.

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    09.04.07
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    51
    Liked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickshoe View Post
    not many (none???) karting axles are mild steel. Their flavors are generally 4130, Ti, or 6061, and apparently some CF out there too.
    What will last the longest? Is CF good to use?

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    02.04.02
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,399
    Liked: 1116

    Default

    I'd guess the 4130 will last the longest, but will also be the heaviest.

  24. #24
    Senior Member Mark H's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.17.00
    Location
    Marietta GA. USA
    Posts
    1,799
    Liked: 1

    Default

    Go with the heavy axle and only one rear brake. On an FC car the rear brakes wear 3-4 times less than the front even with small 19 on the rear and big 20 up front. My buddy that converted a big Ralt FA car only uses a single rear disc too and hasen't looked like he has had any problems stoping a much bigger car? just an idea? Besides like Mario A said...A lot of drivers make the mistake of thinking that the brakes are for stoping the car???
    SuperTech Engineering inc.
    Mark Hatheway

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




About Us
Since 2000, ApexSpeed.com has been the go-to place for amateur road racing enthusiasts, bringing together a friendly community of racers, fans, and industry professionals. We're all about creating a space where people can connect, share knowledge, and exchange parts and vehicles, with a focus on specific race cars, classes, series, and events. Our community includes all major purpose-built road racing classes, like the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) and various pro series across North America and beyond. At ApexSpeed, we're passionate about amateur motorsports and are dedicated to helping our community have fun and grow while creating lasting memories on and off the track.
Social