FYI. Screens captured 20141121 at Yas Marina P2 on Bottas' Williams from T1 exit to T8 approach.
http://i.imgur.com/kiadPV1.jpg
Printable View
FYI. Screens captured 20141121 at Yas Marina P2 on Bottas' Williams from T1 exit to T8 approach.
http://i.imgur.com/kiadPV1.jpg
At the speeds they are traveling, I'd expect it would be essentially IMPOSSIBLE to have absolutely NO movement of the wing unless they built them from STEEL .. and even then, maybe not?
I remember quite a number of years ago, when SpeedVision showed live feed from Schumacher's front wing. I doubt Ferarri was even aware of it until it showed on TV. It definitely showed that the wing was carrying a LOT of LOAD though...
We should put wing cameras on some winged SCCA cars so we can see what's happening to them at speed.
It's all a matter of "degree." ;)
All structures flex under load. Obviously, the questions then are "how much?" and "is that amount legal?"
"I’ll explain what evidence I saw of the RBR front wing flex…
It is the front wing adjuster that allows the movement, The adjuster pod was pointed out above. In the scrutineering bay a hand pressed down with just finger pressure on the top of the adjuster, this was rigid as you’d except. Then shape of the pod was squeezed, its squashed like the bulb on a bicycle horn! Then the hand pressed down on the slotted section of flap just next to the adjuster, the wing deflected very easily. I mean this was not a hefty push with the palm of a hand, more like moving the lid on your laptop. As the wing deflected the bulb deformed too, both sprung back to their original shape as soon as the pressure released.
As you can see the adjuster pod is all black, but that’s because since China it’s been a part made from metal (alu..?) and something black. Before that it was one material and painted the same colour as the wing. I’ve got pictures of the pod and assumed at the time that as it was matt black that the material was carbon of some 3D resin to create the shape. It seems it is a rubber-like material.
Therefore its proven that
1) the pod is flexible, as its counted as bodywork, that alone is in contravention of 3.15.
2) the top of the adjuster is not rigidly connected to the flap below, what appears to be a fastener running from the hex headed top through the mount on the flap is clearly not. It was suggested a leaf spring was employed within the pod between the top of the adjuster and the flap, I haven’t seen the insides of the mechanism, but clearly some form of ‘sprung’ element allows a large degree of movement for very little force. It was suggested by those who have compared it directly to other teams wings, that the RBR flap is 4 times more flexible than its rivals."
scarbs